Cargando…
One Health at gunpoint: Impact of wild boars as exotic species in Brazil - A review
Wild boars have been listed among the 100 most invasive species worldwide, spreading impacts to all continents, with the exception of Antarctica. In Brazil, a major source of introduction was a commercial livestock importation for exotic meat market, followed by successive escapes and releases to na...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10276213/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37332883 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2023.100577 |
_version_ | 1785060028229615616 |
---|---|
author | Kmetiuk, Louise Bach Biondo, Leandro Menegueli Pedrosa, Felipe Favero, Giovani Marino Biondo, Alexander Welker |
author_facet | Kmetiuk, Louise Bach Biondo, Leandro Menegueli Pedrosa, Felipe Favero, Giovani Marino Biondo, Alexander Welker |
author_sort | Kmetiuk, Louise Bach |
collection | PubMed |
description | Wild boars have been listed among the 100 most invasive species worldwide, spreading impacts to all continents, with the exception of Antarctica. In Brazil, a major source of introduction was a commercial livestock importation for exotic meat market, followed by successive escapes and releases to natural ecosystems. Currently found in all six Brazilian biomes, with reports in 11 Brazilian states, wild boars have invaded natural and agricultural areas. Wild boars have been reportedly indicated as hosts and reservoirs of several zoonotic diseases in Brazil, including toxoplasmosis, salmonelosis, leptospirosis, brucellosis, tuberculosis, trichinellosis, and hepatitis E. Wild boars have been also associated with Brazilian spotted fever and rabies, infected while providing plentiful exotic blood supply for native ticks and hematophagous bats. Due to their phylogenetic proximity, wild boars may present ecological niche overlapping and direct disease risk to native white-lipped and collared peccaries. Moreover, wild boars may post an economical threat to Brazilian livestock industry due to restrictive diseases such as Aujeszky, enzootic pneumonia, neosporosis, hemoplasmosis, and classic swine fever. Finally, wild boars have directly impacted in environmentally protected areas, silting up water springs, rooting and wallowing native plants, decreasing native vegetal coverage, disbalancing of soil components, altering soil structure and composition. Wild boar hunting has failed as a control measure to date, according to the Brazilian Ministry of Environment, due to private hunting groups mostly targeting males, intentionally leaving females and piglets alive, disseminating wild boar populations nationwide. Meanwhile, non-government animal welfare organizations have pointed to animal cruelty of hunting dogs and wild boars (and native species) during hunting. Despite unanimous necessity of wild boar control, eradication and prevention, methods have been controversial and should focus on effective governmental measures instead occasional game hunting, which has negatively impacted native wildlife species while wild boars have continuously spread throughout Brazil. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10276213 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102762132023-06-18 One Health at gunpoint: Impact of wild boars as exotic species in Brazil - A review Kmetiuk, Louise Bach Biondo, Leandro Menegueli Pedrosa, Felipe Favero, Giovani Marino Biondo, Alexander Welker One Health Review Paper Wild boars have been listed among the 100 most invasive species worldwide, spreading impacts to all continents, with the exception of Antarctica. In Brazil, a major source of introduction was a commercial livestock importation for exotic meat market, followed by successive escapes and releases to natural ecosystems. Currently found in all six Brazilian biomes, with reports in 11 Brazilian states, wild boars have invaded natural and agricultural areas. Wild boars have been reportedly indicated as hosts and reservoirs of several zoonotic diseases in Brazil, including toxoplasmosis, salmonelosis, leptospirosis, brucellosis, tuberculosis, trichinellosis, and hepatitis E. Wild boars have been also associated with Brazilian spotted fever and rabies, infected while providing plentiful exotic blood supply for native ticks and hematophagous bats. Due to their phylogenetic proximity, wild boars may present ecological niche overlapping and direct disease risk to native white-lipped and collared peccaries. Moreover, wild boars may post an economical threat to Brazilian livestock industry due to restrictive diseases such as Aujeszky, enzootic pneumonia, neosporosis, hemoplasmosis, and classic swine fever. Finally, wild boars have directly impacted in environmentally protected areas, silting up water springs, rooting and wallowing native plants, decreasing native vegetal coverage, disbalancing of soil components, altering soil structure and composition. Wild boar hunting has failed as a control measure to date, according to the Brazilian Ministry of Environment, due to private hunting groups mostly targeting males, intentionally leaving females and piglets alive, disseminating wild boar populations nationwide. Meanwhile, non-government animal welfare organizations have pointed to animal cruelty of hunting dogs and wild boars (and native species) during hunting. Despite unanimous necessity of wild boar control, eradication and prevention, methods have been controversial and should focus on effective governmental measures instead occasional game hunting, which has negatively impacted native wildlife species while wild boars have continuously spread throughout Brazil. Elsevier 2023-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10276213/ /pubmed/37332883 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2023.100577 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Paper Kmetiuk, Louise Bach Biondo, Leandro Menegueli Pedrosa, Felipe Favero, Giovani Marino Biondo, Alexander Welker One Health at gunpoint: Impact of wild boars as exotic species in Brazil - A review |
title | One Health at gunpoint: Impact of wild boars as exotic species in Brazil - A review |
title_full | One Health at gunpoint: Impact of wild boars as exotic species in Brazil - A review |
title_fullStr | One Health at gunpoint: Impact of wild boars as exotic species in Brazil - A review |
title_full_unstemmed | One Health at gunpoint: Impact of wild boars as exotic species in Brazil - A review |
title_short | One Health at gunpoint: Impact of wild boars as exotic species in Brazil - A review |
title_sort | one health at gunpoint: impact of wild boars as exotic species in brazil - a review |
topic | Review Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10276213/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37332883 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2023.100577 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kmetiuklouisebach onehealthatgunpointimpactofwildboarsasexoticspeciesinbrazilareview AT biondoleandromenegueli onehealthatgunpointimpactofwildboarsasexoticspeciesinbrazilareview AT pedrosafelipe onehealthatgunpointimpactofwildboarsasexoticspeciesinbrazilareview AT faverogiovanimarino onehealthatgunpointimpactofwildboarsasexoticspeciesinbrazilareview AT biondoalexanderwelker onehealthatgunpointimpactofwildboarsasexoticspeciesinbrazilareview |