Cargando…

Improving the consistency of experimental swine dysentery inoculation strategies

Swine dysentery (SD) caused by pathogenic Brachyspira spp. is an economic challenge for the swine industry. In research settings, experimental reproduction of swine dysentery typically relies on intragastric inoculation which has shown variable success. This project aimed to improve the consistency...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parra-Aguirre, Juan C., Nosach, Roman, Fernando, Champika, Hill, Janet E., Harding, John C. S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10276399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37328906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13567-023-01180-y
_version_ 1785060068757078016
author Parra-Aguirre, Juan C.
Nosach, Roman
Fernando, Champika
Hill, Janet E.
Harding, John C. S.
author_facet Parra-Aguirre, Juan C.
Nosach, Roman
Fernando, Champika
Hill, Janet E.
Harding, John C. S.
author_sort Parra-Aguirre, Juan C.
collection PubMed
description Swine dysentery (SD) caused by pathogenic Brachyspira spp. is an economic challenge for the swine industry. In research settings, experimental reproduction of swine dysentery typically relies on intragastric inoculation which has shown variable success. This project aimed to improve the consistency of the experimental inoculation protocol used for swine dysentery in our laboratory. Over six experiments, we evaluated the influence of group housing in inoculated pigs using a frozen-thawed broth culture of strongly hemolytic B. hyodysenteriae strain D19 (Trial A), compared the relative virulence of B. hyodysenteriae strains D19 and G44 (Trial B), compared inoculum volumes (50 mL vs 100 mL) for G44 and B. hampsonii 30446 (Trial C), and performed three independent trials evaluating intragastric inoculation using different oral inoculation methods: oral feed balls (Trial D), and oral syringe bolus of 100 mL (Trial E) or 300 mL (Trial F). Intragastric inoculation with a fresh broth culture of B. hyodysenteriae strain G44 resulted in a shorter incubation period and a higher proportionate duration of mucohemorrhagic diarrhea (MMHD) compared to D19. Intragastric inoculation with either 50 or 100 mL of B. hampsonii 30446 or B. hyodysenteriae (G44) were statistically equivalent. Oral inoculation with 100 mL or 300 mL also yielded similar results to intragastric inoculation but was more expensive due to the additional work and supplies associated with syringe training. Our future research will use intragastric inoculation with 100 mL of a fresh broth culture containing B. hyodysenteriae strain G44 as it yields a high incidence of mucohaemorrhagic diarrhea with a reasonable cost. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13567-023-01180-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10276399
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102763992023-06-18 Improving the consistency of experimental swine dysentery inoculation strategies Parra-Aguirre, Juan C. Nosach, Roman Fernando, Champika Hill, Janet E. Harding, John C. S. Vet Res Research Article Swine dysentery (SD) caused by pathogenic Brachyspira spp. is an economic challenge for the swine industry. In research settings, experimental reproduction of swine dysentery typically relies on intragastric inoculation which has shown variable success. This project aimed to improve the consistency of the experimental inoculation protocol used for swine dysentery in our laboratory. Over six experiments, we evaluated the influence of group housing in inoculated pigs using a frozen-thawed broth culture of strongly hemolytic B. hyodysenteriae strain D19 (Trial A), compared the relative virulence of B. hyodysenteriae strains D19 and G44 (Trial B), compared inoculum volumes (50 mL vs 100 mL) for G44 and B. hampsonii 30446 (Trial C), and performed three independent trials evaluating intragastric inoculation using different oral inoculation methods: oral feed balls (Trial D), and oral syringe bolus of 100 mL (Trial E) or 300 mL (Trial F). Intragastric inoculation with a fresh broth culture of B. hyodysenteriae strain G44 resulted in a shorter incubation period and a higher proportionate duration of mucohemorrhagic diarrhea (MMHD) compared to D19. Intragastric inoculation with either 50 or 100 mL of B. hampsonii 30446 or B. hyodysenteriae (G44) were statistically equivalent. Oral inoculation with 100 mL or 300 mL also yielded similar results to intragastric inoculation but was more expensive due to the additional work and supplies associated with syringe training. Our future research will use intragastric inoculation with 100 mL of a fresh broth culture containing B. hyodysenteriae strain G44 as it yields a high incidence of mucohaemorrhagic diarrhea with a reasonable cost. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13567-023-01180-y. BioMed Central 2023-06-16 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10276399/ /pubmed/37328906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13567-023-01180-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Parra-Aguirre, Juan C.
Nosach, Roman
Fernando, Champika
Hill, Janet E.
Harding, John C. S.
Improving the consistency of experimental swine dysentery inoculation strategies
title Improving the consistency of experimental swine dysentery inoculation strategies
title_full Improving the consistency of experimental swine dysentery inoculation strategies
title_fullStr Improving the consistency of experimental swine dysentery inoculation strategies
title_full_unstemmed Improving the consistency of experimental swine dysentery inoculation strategies
title_short Improving the consistency of experimental swine dysentery inoculation strategies
title_sort improving the consistency of experimental swine dysentery inoculation strategies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10276399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37328906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13567-023-01180-y
work_keys_str_mv AT parraaguirrejuanc improvingtheconsistencyofexperimentalswinedysenteryinoculationstrategies
AT nosachroman improvingtheconsistencyofexperimentalswinedysenteryinoculationstrategies
AT fernandochampika improvingtheconsistencyofexperimentalswinedysenteryinoculationstrategies
AT hilljanete improvingtheconsistencyofexperimentalswinedysenteryinoculationstrategies
AT hardingjohncs improvingtheconsistencyofexperimentalswinedysenteryinoculationstrategies