Cargando…
Current methods for contactless optical patient diagnosis: a systematic review
Many countries around the world face a shortage of medical personnel, leading to work overload or even burnout. This calls for political and scientific solutions to relieve the medical personnel. The measurement of vital signs in hospitals is still predominately carried out manually with traditional...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10276455/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37330551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-023-01125-8 |
_version_ | 1785060082097061888 |
---|---|
author | Alić, Belmin Zauber, Tim Wiede, Christian Seidl, Karsten |
author_facet | Alić, Belmin Zauber, Tim Wiede, Christian Seidl, Karsten |
author_sort | Alić, Belmin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Many countries around the world face a shortage of medical personnel, leading to work overload or even burnout. This calls for political and scientific solutions to relieve the medical personnel. The measurement of vital signs in hospitals is still predominately carried out manually with traditional contact-based methods, taking over a substantial share of the medical personnel’s workload. The introduction of contactless methods for vital sign monitoring (e.g., with a camera) has great potential to relieve the medical personnel. This systematic review’s objective is to analyze the state of the art in the field of contactless optical patient diagnosis. This review distinguishes itself from already existing reviews by considering studies that do not only propose the contactless measurement of vital signs but also include an automatic diagnosis of the patient’s condition. This means that the included studies incorporate the physician’s reasoning and evaluation of vital signs into their algorithms, allowing an automated patient diagnosis. The literature screening of two independent reviewers resulted in a total of five eligible studies. The highest number of studies (three) introduce methods for the risk assessment of infectious diseases, one study introduces a method for the risk assessment of cardiovascular diseases, and one study introduces a method for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea. Overall, high heterogeneity in relevant study parameters is reported among the included studies. The low number of included studies indicates a large research gap and emphasizes the demand for further research on this emerging topic. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12938-023-01125-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10276455 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102764552023-06-18 Current methods for contactless optical patient diagnosis: a systematic review Alić, Belmin Zauber, Tim Wiede, Christian Seidl, Karsten Biomed Eng Online Review Many countries around the world face a shortage of medical personnel, leading to work overload or even burnout. This calls for political and scientific solutions to relieve the medical personnel. The measurement of vital signs in hospitals is still predominately carried out manually with traditional contact-based methods, taking over a substantial share of the medical personnel’s workload. The introduction of contactless methods for vital sign monitoring (e.g., with a camera) has great potential to relieve the medical personnel. This systematic review’s objective is to analyze the state of the art in the field of contactless optical patient diagnosis. This review distinguishes itself from already existing reviews by considering studies that do not only propose the contactless measurement of vital signs but also include an automatic diagnosis of the patient’s condition. This means that the included studies incorporate the physician’s reasoning and evaluation of vital signs into their algorithms, allowing an automated patient diagnosis. The literature screening of two independent reviewers resulted in a total of five eligible studies. The highest number of studies (three) introduce methods for the risk assessment of infectious diseases, one study introduces a method for the risk assessment of cardiovascular diseases, and one study introduces a method for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea. Overall, high heterogeneity in relevant study parameters is reported among the included studies. The low number of included studies indicates a large research gap and emphasizes the demand for further research on this emerging topic. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12938-023-01125-8. BioMed Central 2023-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10276455/ /pubmed/37330551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-023-01125-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Alić, Belmin Zauber, Tim Wiede, Christian Seidl, Karsten Current methods for contactless optical patient diagnosis: a systematic review |
title | Current methods for contactless optical patient diagnosis: a systematic review |
title_full | Current methods for contactless optical patient diagnosis: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Current methods for contactless optical patient diagnosis: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Current methods for contactless optical patient diagnosis: a systematic review |
title_short | Current methods for contactless optical patient diagnosis: a systematic review |
title_sort | current methods for contactless optical patient diagnosis: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10276455/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37330551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-023-01125-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alicbelmin currentmethodsforcontactlessopticalpatientdiagnosisasystematicreview AT zaubertim currentmethodsforcontactlessopticalpatientdiagnosisasystematicreview AT wiedechristian currentmethodsforcontactlessopticalpatientdiagnosisasystematicreview AT seidlkarsten currentmethodsforcontactlessopticalpatientdiagnosisasystematicreview |