Cargando…

A cluster-randomized trial of a brief multi-component intervention to improve tobacco outcomes in substance use treatment

BACKGROUND: Smoking prevalence is high among people in substance use disorder (SUD) treatment, and program interventions to address smoking are often complex and lengthy. This cluster-randomized trial tested whether a brief multi-component intervention impacted tobacco outcomes among staff and clien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guydish, Joseph, McCuistian, Caravella, Hosakote, Sindhushree, Le, Thao, Masson, Carmen L., Campbell, Barbara K., Delucchi, Kevin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10276468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37328775
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13011-023-00539-w
_version_ 1785060085207138304
author Guydish, Joseph
McCuistian, Caravella
Hosakote, Sindhushree
Le, Thao
Masson, Carmen L.
Campbell, Barbara K.
Delucchi, Kevin
author_facet Guydish, Joseph
McCuistian, Caravella
Hosakote, Sindhushree
Le, Thao
Masson, Carmen L.
Campbell, Barbara K.
Delucchi, Kevin
author_sort Guydish, Joseph
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Smoking prevalence is high among people in substance use disorder (SUD) treatment, and program interventions to address smoking are often complex and lengthy. This cluster-randomized trial tested whether a brief multi-component intervention impacted tobacco outcomes among staff and clients. METHODS: Seven SUD treatment programs were randomly assigned to the multi-component intervention or to waitlist control. The 6-month intervention included a leadership motivation assessment, program incentives, 4 staff training sessions and a leadership learning community session. Survey data were collected from staff and clients at pre- and post-intervention. Outcomes were first compared across condition (intervention vs waitlist control), and then examined pre- to post-intervention with condition collapsed. RESULTS: Staff in the intervention (n = 48) and control conditions (n = 26) did not differ at post-intervention on smoking prevalence, self-efficacy to help clients quit, or practices used to help clients quit smoking. Intervention clients (n = 113) did not differ from controls (n = 61) in smoking prevalence or receipt of tobacco services. Pre-post comparisons collapsed across condition showed a decrease in client and staff smoking prevalence, which could not be attributed to the intervention, and a decrease in client receipt of cessation medication. CONCLUSION: The brief multi-component intervention did not support changes in smoking prevalence or in tobacco-related services received by clients. Other intervention features are needed to reduce smoking among SUD clients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Randomization occurred at the program level and outcomes measured are program-level measures. Accordingly, the trial is not registered. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13011-023-00539-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10276468
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102764682023-06-18 A cluster-randomized trial of a brief multi-component intervention to improve tobacco outcomes in substance use treatment Guydish, Joseph McCuistian, Caravella Hosakote, Sindhushree Le, Thao Masson, Carmen L. Campbell, Barbara K. Delucchi, Kevin Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy Research BACKGROUND: Smoking prevalence is high among people in substance use disorder (SUD) treatment, and program interventions to address smoking are often complex and lengthy. This cluster-randomized trial tested whether a brief multi-component intervention impacted tobacco outcomes among staff and clients. METHODS: Seven SUD treatment programs were randomly assigned to the multi-component intervention or to waitlist control. The 6-month intervention included a leadership motivation assessment, program incentives, 4 staff training sessions and a leadership learning community session. Survey data were collected from staff and clients at pre- and post-intervention. Outcomes were first compared across condition (intervention vs waitlist control), and then examined pre- to post-intervention with condition collapsed. RESULTS: Staff in the intervention (n = 48) and control conditions (n = 26) did not differ at post-intervention on smoking prevalence, self-efficacy to help clients quit, or practices used to help clients quit smoking. Intervention clients (n = 113) did not differ from controls (n = 61) in smoking prevalence or receipt of tobacco services. Pre-post comparisons collapsed across condition showed a decrease in client and staff smoking prevalence, which could not be attributed to the intervention, and a decrease in client receipt of cessation medication. CONCLUSION: The brief multi-component intervention did not support changes in smoking prevalence or in tobacco-related services received by clients. Other intervention features are needed to reduce smoking among SUD clients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Randomization occurred at the program level and outcomes measured are program-level measures. Accordingly, the trial is not registered. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13011-023-00539-w. BioMed Central 2023-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10276468/ /pubmed/37328775 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13011-023-00539-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Guydish, Joseph
McCuistian, Caravella
Hosakote, Sindhushree
Le, Thao
Masson, Carmen L.
Campbell, Barbara K.
Delucchi, Kevin
A cluster-randomized trial of a brief multi-component intervention to improve tobacco outcomes in substance use treatment
title A cluster-randomized trial of a brief multi-component intervention to improve tobacco outcomes in substance use treatment
title_full A cluster-randomized trial of a brief multi-component intervention to improve tobacco outcomes in substance use treatment
title_fullStr A cluster-randomized trial of a brief multi-component intervention to improve tobacco outcomes in substance use treatment
title_full_unstemmed A cluster-randomized trial of a brief multi-component intervention to improve tobacco outcomes in substance use treatment
title_short A cluster-randomized trial of a brief multi-component intervention to improve tobacco outcomes in substance use treatment
title_sort cluster-randomized trial of a brief multi-component intervention to improve tobacco outcomes in substance use treatment
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10276468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37328775
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13011-023-00539-w
work_keys_str_mv AT guydishjoseph aclusterrandomizedtrialofabriefmulticomponentinterventiontoimprovetobaccooutcomesinsubstanceusetreatment
AT mccuistiancaravella aclusterrandomizedtrialofabriefmulticomponentinterventiontoimprovetobaccooutcomesinsubstanceusetreatment
AT hosakotesindhushree aclusterrandomizedtrialofabriefmulticomponentinterventiontoimprovetobaccooutcomesinsubstanceusetreatment
AT lethao aclusterrandomizedtrialofabriefmulticomponentinterventiontoimprovetobaccooutcomesinsubstanceusetreatment
AT massoncarmenl aclusterrandomizedtrialofabriefmulticomponentinterventiontoimprovetobaccooutcomesinsubstanceusetreatment
AT campbellbarbarak aclusterrandomizedtrialofabriefmulticomponentinterventiontoimprovetobaccooutcomesinsubstanceusetreatment
AT delucchikevin aclusterrandomizedtrialofabriefmulticomponentinterventiontoimprovetobaccooutcomesinsubstanceusetreatment
AT guydishjoseph clusterrandomizedtrialofabriefmulticomponentinterventiontoimprovetobaccooutcomesinsubstanceusetreatment
AT mccuistiancaravella clusterrandomizedtrialofabriefmulticomponentinterventiontoimprovetobaccooutcomesinsubstanceusetreatment
AT hosakotesindhushree clusterrandomizedtrialofabriefmulticomponentinterventiontoimprovetobaccooutcomesinsubstanceusetreatment
AT lethao clusterrandomizedtrialofabriefmulticomponentinterventiontoimprovetobaccooutcomesinsubstanceusetreatment
AT massoncarmenl clusterrandomizedtrialofabriefmulticomponentinterventiontoimprovetobaccooutcomesinsubstanceusetreatment
AT campbellbarbarak clusterrandomizedtrialofabriefmulticomponentinterventiontoimprovetobaccooutcomesinsubstanceusetreatment
AT delucchikevin clusterrandomizedtrialofabriefmulticomponentinterventiontoimprovetobaccooutcomesinsubstanceusetreatment