Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of effectiveness of twenty versus fifty percent autologous serum eye drops in treatment of dry eye

PURPOSE: The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of two concentration of autologous serum (AS) 20% vs 50% in recalcitrant moderate-to-severe dry eye patients. METHODS: A double-blind prospective, interventional, and randomized study was done on 44 patients (80 eyes) clinica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumari, Neha, Kusumesh, Rakhi, Kumari, Rekha, Sinha, Bibhuti Prassan, Singh, Vivek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10276660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37026309
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_2684_22
_version_ 1785060122950631424
author Kumari, Neha
Kusumesh, Rakhi
Kumari, Rekha
Sinha, Bibhuti Prassan
Singh, Vivek
author_facet Kumari, Neha
Kusumesh, Rakhi
Kumari, Rekha
Sinha, Bibhuti Prassan
Singh, Vivek
author_sort Kumari, Neha
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of two concentration of autologous serum (AS) 20% vs 50% in recalcitrant moderate-to-severe dry eye patients. METHODS: A double-blind prospective, interventional, and randomized study was done on 44 patients (80 eyes) clinically diagnosed with moderate-to-severe dry eye disease (DED) that was refractory to conventional treatment, and all patients were treated with AS20% or AS50% for 12 weeks. We documented Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), tear film breakup time (TBUT), OXFORD corneal staining score (OSS), and Schirmer test (ST) at baseline, 2,4,8, and 12 weeks. These parameters were compared in both groups and between the groups by using Student’s t-test. The study included 11 males and 33 females. RESULTS: Out of 80 eyes, 33 eyes had moderate and 47 had severe DED. The age of patients in AS20% was 44.73 ± 14.37 years, and in AS50% was 46.41 ± 14.47 years. The most common etiology associated with DED was secondary Sjogren syndrome. In moderate DED, both the groups showed significant improvement in both subjective and objective parameters. But in severe DED, the AS20% group failed to show any significant improvement objectively, though subjective improvement was present. CONCLUSION: In refractory severe DED patients, AS50% is better option for treatment and in moderate DED both concentrations of autologous serum are effective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10276660
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102766602023-06-18 Comparative evaluation of effectiveness of twenty versus fifty percent autologous serum eye drops in treatment of dry eye Kumari, Neha Kusumesh, Rakhi Kumari, Rekha Sinha, Bibhuti Prassan Singh, Vivek Indian J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of two concentration of autologous serum (AS) 20% vs 50% in recalcitrant moderate-to-severe dry eye patients. METHODS: A double-blind prospective, interventional, and randomized study was done on 44 patients (80 eyes) clinically diagnosed with moderate-to-severe dry eye disease (DED) that was refractory to conventional treatment, and all patients were treated with AS20% or AS50% for 12 weeks. We documented Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), tear film breakup time (TBUT), OXFORD corneal staining score (OSS), and Schirmer test (ST) at baseline, 2,4,8, and 12 weeks. These parameters were compared in both groups and between the groups by using Student’s t-test. The study included 11 males and 33 females. RESULTS: Out of 80 eyes, 33 eyes had moderate and 47 had severe DED. The age of patients in AS20% was 44.73 ± 14.37 years, and in AS50% was 46.41 ± 14.47 years. The most common etiology associated with DED was secondary Sjogren syndrome. In moderate DED, both the groups showed significant improvement in both subjective and objective parameters. But in severe DED, the AS20% group failed to show any significant improvement objectively, though subjective improvement was present. CONCLUSION: In refractory severe DED patients, AS50% is better option for treatment and in moderate DED both concentrations of autologous serum are effective. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023-04 2023-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10276660/ /pubmed/37026309 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_2684_22 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Indian Journal of Ophthalmology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kumari, Neha
Kusumesh, Rakhi
Kumari, Rekha
Sinha, Bibhuti Prassan
Singh, Vivek
Comparative evaluation of effectiveness of twenty versus fifty percent autologous serum eye drops in treatment of dry eye
title Comparative evaluation of effectiveness of twenty versus fifty percent autologous serum eye drops in treatment of dry eye
title_full Comparative evaluation of effectiveness of twenty versus fifty percent autologous serum eye drops in treatment of dry eye
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of effectiveness of twenty versus fifty percent autologous serum eye drops in treatment of dry eye
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of effectiveness of twenty versus fifty percent autologous serum eye drops in treatment of dry eye
title_short Comparative evaluation of effectiveness of twenty versus fifty percent autologous serum eye drops in treatment of dry eye
title_sort comparative evaluation of effectiveness of twenty versus fifty percent autologous serum eye drops in treatment of dry eye
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10276660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37026309
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_2684_22
work_keys_str_mv AT kumarineha comparativeevaluationofeffectivenessoftwentyversusfiftypercentautologousserumeyedropsintreatmentofdryeye
AT kusumeshrakhi comparativeevaluationofeffectivenessoftwentyversusfiftypercentautologousserumeyedropsintreatmentofdryeye
AT kumarirekha comparativeevaluationofeffectivenessoftwentyversusfiftypercentautologousserumeyedropsintreatmentofdryeye
AT sinhabibhutiprassan comparativeevaluationofeffectivenessoftwentyversusfiftypercentautologousserumeyedropsintreatmentofdryeye
AT singhvivek comparativeevaluationofeffectivenessoftwentyversusfiftypercentautologousserumeyedropsintreatmentofdryeye