Cargando…

The Challenges for Manufacturers of the Increased Clinical Evaluation in the European Medical Device Regulations: A Quantitative Study

The European Union Medical Device Regulations 2017/745 entered into force on May 2021 with changes related to strengthening the clinical evaluation requirements, particularly for high-risk devices. This study investigates how the increased requirements on medical device manufacturers in relation to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kearney, Breda, McDermott, Olivia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10276779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37198369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43441-023-00527-z
_version_ 1785060150094069760
author Kearney, Breda
McDermott, Olivia
author_facet Kearney, Breda
McDermott, Olivia
author_sort Kearney, Breda
collection PubMed
description The European Union Medical Device Regulations 2017/745 entered into force on May 2021 with changes related to strengthening the clinical evaluation requirements, particularly for high-risk devices. This study investigates how the increased requirements on medical device manufacturers in relation to how clinical evaluation will challenge manufacturers. A quantitative survey study was utilized with responses from 68 senior or functional area subject matter experts working in medical device manufacturing Regulatory or Quality roles. The findings from the study demonstrated that the highest source of reactive Post-Market Surveillance data was customer complaints and proactive data were Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up. In contrast, the top 3 sources for generating clinical evaluation data for legacy devices under the new Medical Device Regulations were Post-Market Surveillance data, Scientific literature reviews, and Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up studies. Manufacturers’ biggest challenge under the new Medical Device Regulations is determining the amount of data needed to generate sufficient clinical evidence, while over 60% of high-risk device manufacturers have outsourced the writing of their clinical evaluation reports. Manufacturers also reported a high investment in clinical evaluation training and highlighted inconsistencies in the requirements for clinical data by different notified bodies. These challenges may lead to a potential shortage of certain medical devices in the E.U. and a delay in access to new devices, negatively impacting patient quality of life (1). This study provides a unique insight into the challenges currently experienced by medical device manufacturers as they transition to the MDR clinical evaluation requirements and the subsequent impact on the continued availability of medical devices in the E.U.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10276779
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102767792023-06-19 The Challenges for Manufacturers of the Increased Clinical Evaluation in the European Medical Device Regulations: A Quantitative Study Kearney, Breda McDermott, Olivia Ther Innov Regul Sci Original Research The European Union Medical Device Regulations 2017/745 entered into force on May 2021 with changes related to strengthening the clinical evaluation requirements, particularly for high-risk devices. This study investigates how the increased requirements on medical device manufacturers in relation to how clinical evaluation will challenge manufacturers. A quantitative survey study was utilized with responses from 68 senior or functional area subject matter experts working in medical device manufacturing Regulatory or Quality roles. The findings from the study demonstrated that the highest source of reactive Post-Market Surveillance data was customer complaints and proactive data were Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up. In contrast, the top 3 sources for generating clinical evaluation data for legacy devices under the new Medical Device Regulations were Post-Market Surveillance data, Scientific literature reviews, and Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up studies. Manufacturers’ biggest challenge under the new Medical Device Regulations is determining the amount of data needed to generate sufficient clinical evidence, while over 60% of high-risk device manufacturers have outsourced the writing of their clinical evaluation reports. Manufacturers also reported a high investment in clinical evaluation training and highlighted inconsistencies in the requirements for clinical data by different notified bodies. These challenges may lead to a potential shortage of certain medical devices in the E.U. and a delay in access to new devices, negatively impacting patient quality of life (1). This study provides a unique insight into the challenges currently experienced by medical device manufacturers as they transition to the MDR clinical evaluation requirements and the subsequent impact on the continued availability of medical devices in the E.U. Springer International Publishing 2023-05-17 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10276779/ /pubmed/37198369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43441-023-00527-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Kearney, Breda
McDermott, Olivia
The Challenges for Manufacturers of the Increased Clinical Evaluation in the European Medical Device Regulations: A Quantitative Study
title The Challenges for Manufacturers of the Increased Clinical Evaluation in the European Medical Device Regulations: A Quantitative Study
title_full The Challenges for Manufacturers of the Increased Clinical Evaluation in the European Medical Device Regulations: A Quantitative Study
title_fullStr The Challenges for Manufacturers of the Increased Clinical Evaluation in the European Medical Device Regulations: A Quantitative Study
title_full_unstemmed The Challenges for Manufacturers of the Increased Clinical Evaluation in the European Medical Device Regulations: A Quantitative Study
title_short The Challenges for Manufacturers of the Increased Clinical Evaluation in the European Medical Device Regulations: A Quantitative Study
title_sort challenges for manufacturers of the increased clinical evaluation in the european medical device regulations: a quantitative study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10276779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37198369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43441-023-00527-z
work_keys_str_mv AT kearneybreda thechallengesformanufacturersoftheincreasedclinicalevaluationintheeuropeanmedicaldeviceregulationsaquantitativestudy
AT mcdermottolivia thechallengesformanufacturersoftheincreasedclinicalevaluationintheeuropeanmedicaldeviceregulationsaquantitativestudy
AT kearneybreda challengesformanufacturersoftheincreasedclinicalevaluationintheeuropeanmedicaldeviceregulationsaquantitativestudy
AT mcdermottolivia challengesformanufacturersoftheincreasedclinicalevaluationintheeuropeanmedicaldeviceregulationsaquantitativestudy