Cargando…

Safety and efficacy of hydroxychloroquine as prophylactic against COVID-19 in healthcare workers: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials

OBJECTIVE: We studied the safety and efficacy of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) as pre-exposure prophylaxis for COVID-19 in healthcare workers (HCWs), using a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). DATA SOURCES: PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched to identify randomised trials studyin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hong, Hwanhee, Friedland, Anne, Hu, Mengyi, Anstrom, Kevin J, Halabi, Susan, McKinnon, John E, Amaravadi, Ravi, Rojas-Serrano, Jorge, Abella, Benjamin S, Portillo-Vázquez, Angélica Margarita, Woods, Christopher W, Hernandez, Adrian F, Boulware, David R, Naggie, Susanna, Rajasingham, Radha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10276967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37328184
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065305
_version_ 1785060191251726336
author Hong, Hwanhee
Friedland, Anne
Hu, Mengyi
Anstrom, Kevin J
Halabi, Susan
McKinnon, John E
Amaravadi, Ravi
Rojas-Serrano, Jorge
Abella, Benjamin S
Portillo-Vázquez, Angélica Margarita
Woods, Christopher W
Hernandez, Adrian F
Boulware, David R
Naggie, Susanna
Rajasingham, Radha
author_facet Hong, Hwanhee
Friedland, Anne
Hu, Mengyi
Anstrom, Kevin J
Halabi, Susan
McKinnon, John E
Amaravadi, Ravi
Rojas-Serrano, Jorge
Abella, Benjamin S
Portillo-Vázquez, Angélica Margarita
Woods, Christopher W
Hernandez, Adrian F
Boulware, David R
Naggie, Susanna
Rajasingham, Radha
author_sort Hong, Hwanhee
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We studied the safety and efficacy of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) as pre-exposure prophylaxis for COVID-19 in healthcare workers (HCWs), using a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). DATA SOURCES: PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched to identify randomised trials studying HCQ. STUDY SELECTION: Ten RCTs were identified (n=5079 participants). DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were used in this systematic review and meta-analysis between HCQ and placebo using a Bayesian random-effects model. A pre-hoc statistical analysis plan was written. MAIN OUTCOMES: The primary efficacy outcome was PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and the primary safety outcome was incidence of adverse events. The secondary outcome included clinically suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, HCWs randomised to HCQ had no significant difference in PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (OR 0.92, 95% credible interval (CI): 0.58, 1.37) or clinically suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection (OR 0.78, 95% CI: 0.57, 1.10), but significant difference in adverse events (OR 1.35, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.73). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Our meta-analysis of 10 RCTs investigating the safety and efficacy of HCQ as pre-exposure prophylaxis in HCWs found that compared with placebo, HCQ does not significantly reduce the risk of confirmed or clinically suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection, while HCQ significantly increases adverse events. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021285093.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10276967
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102769672023-06-19 Safety and efficacy of hydroxychloroquine as prophylactic against COVID-19 in healthcare workers: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials Hong, Hwanhee Friedland, Anne Hu, Mengyi Anstrom, Kevin J Halabi, Susan McKinnon, John E Amaravadi, Ravi Rojas-Serrano, Jorge Abella, Benjamin S Portillo-Vázquez, Angélica Margarita Woods, Christopher W Hernandez, Adrian F Boulware, David R Naggie, Susanna Rajasingham, Radha BMJ Open Infectious Diseases OBJECTIVE: We studied the safety and efficacy of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) as pre-exposure prophylaxis for COVID-19 in healthcare workers (HCWs), using a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). DATA SOURCES: PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched to identify randomised trials studying HCQ. STUDY SELECTION: Ten RCTs were identified (n=5079 participants). DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were used in this systematic review and meta-analysis between HCQ and placebo using a Bayesian random-effects model. A pre-hoc statistical analysis plan was written. MAIN OUTCOMES: The primary efficacy outcome was PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and the primary safety outcome was incidence of adverse events. The secondary outcome included clinically suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, HCWs randomised to HCQ had no significant difference in PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (OR 0.92, 95% credible interval (CI): 0.58, 1.37) or clinically suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection (OR 0.78, 95% CI: 0.57, 1.10), but significant difference in adverse events (OR 1.35, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.73). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Our meta-analysis of 10 RCTs investigating the safety and efficacy of HCQ as pre-exposure prophylaxis in HCWs found that compared with placebo, HCQ does not significantly reduce the risk of confirmed or clinically suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection, while HCQ significantly increases adverse events. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021285093. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10276967/ /pubmed/37328184 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065305 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Infectious Diseases
Hong, Hwanhee
Friedland, Anne
Hu, Mengyi
Anstrom, Kevin J
Halabi, Susan
McKinnon, John E
Amaravadi, Ravi
Rojas-Serrano, Jorge
Abella, Benjamin S
Portillo-Vázquez, Angélica Margarita
Woods, Christopher W
Hernandez, Adrian F
Boulware, David R
Naggie, Susanna
Rajasingham, Radha
Safety and efficacy of hydroxychloroquine as prophylactic against COVID-19 in healthcare workers: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials
title Safety and efficacy of hydroxychloroquine as prophylactic against COVID-19 in healthcare workers: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials
title_full Safety and efficacy of hydroxychloroquine as prophylactic against COVID-19 in healthcare workers: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials
title_fullStr Safety and efficacy of hydroxychloroquine as prophylactic against COVID-19 in healthcare workers: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials
title_full_unstemmed Safety and efficacy of hydroxychloroquine as prophylactic against COVID-19 in healthcare workers: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials
title_short Safety and efficacy of hydroxychloroquine as prophylactic against COVID-19 in healthcare workers: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials
title_sort safety and efficacy of hydroxychloroquine as prophylactic against covid-19 in healthcare workers: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials
topic Infectious Diseases
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10276967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37328184
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065305
work_keys_str_mv AT honghwanhee safetyandefficacyofhydroxychloroquineasprophylacticagainstcovid19inhealthcareworkersametaanalysisofrandomisedclinicaltrials
AT friedlandanne safetyandefficacyofhydroxychloroquineasprophylacticagainstcovid19inhealthcareworkersametaanalysisofrandomisedclinicaltrials
AT humengyi safetyandefficacyofhydroxychloroquineasprophylacticagainstcovid19inhealthcareworkersametaanalysisofrandomisedclinicaltrials
AT anstromkevinj safetyandefficacyofhydroxychloroquineasprophylacticagainstcovid19inhealthcareworkersametaanalysisofrandomisedclinicaltrials
AT halabisusan safetyandefficacyofhydroxychloroquineasprophylacticagainstcovid19inhealthcareworkersametaanalysisofrandomisedclinicaltrials
AT mckinnonjohne safetyandefficacyofhydroxychloroquineasprophylacticagainstcovid19inhealthcareworkersametaanalysisofrandomisedclinicaltrials
AT amaravadiravi safetyandefficacyofhydroxychloroquineasprophylacticagainstcovid19inhealthcareworkersametaanalysisofrandomisedclinicaltrials
AT rojasserranojorge safetyandefficacyofhydroxychloroquineasprophylacticagainstcovid19inhealthcareworkersametaanalysisofrandomisedclinicaltrials
AT abellabenjamins safetyandefficacyofhydroxychloroquineasprophylacticagainstcovid19inhealthcareworkersametaanalysisofrandomisedclinicaltrials
AT portillovazquezangelicamargarita safetyandefficacyofhydroxychloroquineasprophylacticagainstcovid19inhealthcareworkersametaanalysisofrandomisedclinicaltrials
AT woodschristopherw safetyandefficacyofhydroxychloroquineasprophylacticagainstcovid19inhealthcareworkersametaanalysisofrandomisedclinicaltrials
AT hernandezadrianf safetyandefficacyofhydroxychloroquineasprophylacticagainstcovid19inhealthcareworkersametaanalysisofrandomisedclinicaltrials
AT boulwaredavidr safetyandefficacyofhydroxychloroquineasprophylacticagainstcovid19inhealthcareworkersametaanalysisofrandomisedclinicaltrials
AT naggiesusanna safetyandefficacyofhydroxychloroquineasprophylacticagainstcovid19inhealthcareworkersametaanalysisofrandomisedclinicaltrials
AT rajasinghamradha safetyandefficacyofhydroxychloroquineasprophylacticagainstcovid19inhealthcareworkersametaanalysisofrandomisedclinicaltrials