Cargando…
Safety and efficacy of hydroxychloroquine as prophylactic against COVID-19 in healthcare workers: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials
OBJECTIVE: We studied the safety and efficacy of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) as pre-exposure prophylaxis for COVID-19 in healthcare workers (HCWs), using a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). DATA SOURCES: PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched to identify randomised trials studyin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10276967/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37328184 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065305 |
_version_ | 1785060191251726336 |
---|---|
author | Hong, Hwanhee Friedland, Anne Hu, Mengyi Anstrom, Kevin J Halabi, Susan McKinnon, John E Amaravadi, Ravi Rojas-Serrano, Jorge Abella, Benjamin S Portillo-Vázquez, Angélica Margarita Woods, Christopher W Hernandez, Adrian F Boulware, David R Naggie, Susanna Rajasingham, Radha |
author_facet | Hong, Hwanhee Friedland, Anne Hu, Mengyi Anstrom, Kevin J Halabi, Susan McKinnon, John E Amaravadi, Ravi Rojas-Serrano, Jorge Abella, Benjamin S Portillo-Vázquez, Angélica Margarita Woods, Christopher W Hernandez, Adrian F Boulware, David R Naggie, Susanna Rajasingham, Radha |
author_sort | Hong, Hwanhee |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: We studied the safety and efficacy of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) as pre-exposure prophylaxis for COVID-19 in healthcare workers (HCWs), using a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). DATA SOURCES: PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched to identify randomised trials studying HCQ. STUDY SELECTION: Ten RCTs were identified (n=5079 participants). DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were used in this systematic review and meta-analysis between HCQ and placebo using a Bayesian random-effects model. A pre-hoc statistical analysis plan was written. MAIN OUTCOMES: The primary efficacy outcome was PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and the primary safety outcome was incidence of adverse events. The secondary outcome included clinically suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, HCWs randomised to HCQ had no significant difference in PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (OR 0.92, 95% credible interval (CI): 0.58, 1.37) or clinically suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection (OR 0.78, 95% CI: 0.57, 1.10), but significant difference in adverse events (OR 1.35, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.73). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Our meta-analysis of 10 RCTs investigating the safety and efficacy of HCQ as pre-exposure prophylaxis in HCWs found that compared with placebo, HCQ does not significantly reduce the risk of confirmed or clinically suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection, while HCQ significantly increases adverse events. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021285093. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10276967 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102769672023-06-19 Safety and efficacy of hydroxychloroquine as prophylactic against COVID-19 in healthcare workers: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials Hong, Hwanhee Friedland, Anne Hu, Mengyi Anstrom, Kevin J Halabi, Susan McKinnon, John E Amaravadi, Ravi Rojas-Serrano, Jorge Abella, Benjamin S Portillo-Vázquez, Angélica Margarita Woods, Christopher W Hernandez, Adrian F Boulware, David R Naggie, Susanna Rajasingham, Radha BMJ Open Infectious Diseases OBJECTIVE: We studied the safety and efficacy of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) as pre-exposure prophylaxis for COVID-19 in healthcare workers (HCWs), using a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). DATA SOURCES: PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched to identify randomised trials studying HCQ. STUDY SELECTION: Ten RCTs were identified (n=5079 participants). DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were used in this systematic review and meta-analysis between HCQ and placebo using a Bayesian random-effects model. A pre-hoc statistical analysis plan was written. MAIN OUTCOMES: The primary efficacy outcome was PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and the primary safety outcome was incidence of adverse events. The secondary outcome included clinically suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, HCWs randomised to HCQ had no significant difference in PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (OR 0.92, 95% credible interval (CI): 0.58, 1.37) or clinically suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection (OR 0.78, 95% CI: 0.57, 1.10), but significant difference in adverse events (OR 1.35, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.73). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Our meta-analysis of 10 RCTs investigating the safety and efficacy of HCQ as pre-exposure prophylaxis in HCWs found that compared with placebo, HCQ does not significantly reduce the risk of confirmed or clinically suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection, while HCQ significantly increases adverse events. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021285093. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10276967/ /pubmed/37328184 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065305 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Infectious Diseases Hong, Hwanhee Friedland, Anne Hu, Mengyi Anstrom, Kevin J Halabi, Susan McKinnon, John E Amaravadi, Ravi Rojas-Serrano, Jorge Abella, Benjamin S Portillo-Vázquez, Angélica Margarita Woods, Christopher W Hernandez, Adrian F Boulware, David R Naggie, Susanna Rajasingham, Radha Safety and efficacy of hydroxychloroquine as prophylactic against COVID-19 in healthcare workers: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials |
title | Safety and efficacy of hydroxychloroquine as prophylactic against COVID-19 in healthcare workers: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials |
title_full | Safety and efficacy of hydroxychloroquine as prophylactic against COVID-19 in healthcare workers: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials |
title_fullStr | Safety and efficacy of hydroxychloroquine as prophylactic against COVID-19 in healthcare workers: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and efficacy of hydroxychloroquine as prophylactic against COVID-19 in healthcare workers: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials |
title_short | Safety and efficacy of hydroxychloroquine as prophylactic against COVID-19 in healthcare workers: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials |
title_sort | safety and efficacy of hydroxychloroquine as prophylactic against covid-19 in healthcare workers: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials |
topic | Infectious Diseases |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10276967/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37328184 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065305 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT honghwanhee safetyandefficacyofhydroxychloroquineasprophylacticagainstcovid19inhealthcareworkersametaanalysisofrandomisedclinicaltrials AT friedlandanne safetyandefficacyofhydroxychloroquineasprophylacticagainstcovid19inhealthcareworkersametaanalysisofrandomisedclinicaltrials AT humengyi safetyandefficacyofhydroxychloroquineasprophylacticagainstcovid19inhealthcareworkersametaanalysisofrandomisedclinicaltrials AT anstromkevinj safetyandefficacyofhydroxychloroquineasprophylacticagainstcovid19inhealthcareworkersametaanalysisofrandomisedclinicaltrials AT halabisusan safetyandefficacyofhydroxychloroquineasprophylacticagainstcovid19inhealthcareworkersametaanalysisofrandomisedclinicaltrials AT mckinnonjohne safetyandefficacyofhydroxychloroquineasprophylacticagainstcovid19inhealthcareworkersametaanalysisofrandomisedclinicaltrials AT amaravadiravi safetyandefficacyofhydroxychloroquineasprophylacticagainstcovid19inhealthcareworkersametaanalysisofrandomisedclinicaltrials AT rojasserranojorge safetyandefficacyofhydroxychloroquineasprophylacticagainstcovid19inhealthcareworkersametaanalysisofrandomisedclinicaltrials AT abellabenjamins safetyandefficacyofhydroxychloroquineasprophylacticagainstcovid19inhealthcareworkersametaanalysisofrandomisedclinicaltrials AT portillovazquezangelicamargarita safetyandefficacyofhydroxychloroquineasprophylacticagainstcovid19inhealthcareworkersametaanalysisofrandomisedclinicaltrials AT woodschristopherw safetyandefficacyofhydroxychloroquineasprophylacticagainstcovid19inhealthcareworkersametaanalysisofrandomisedclinicaltrials AT hernandezadrianf safetyandefficacyofhydroxychloroquineasprophylacticagainstcovid19inhealthcareworkersametaanalysisofrandomisedclinicaltrials AT boulwaredavidr safetyandefficacyofhydroxychloroquineasprophylacticagainstcovid19inhealthcareworkersametaanalysisofrandomisedclinicaltrials AT naggiesusanna safetyandefficacyofhydroxychloroquineasprophylacticagainstcovid19inhealthcareworkersametaanalysisofrandomisedclinicaltrials AT rajasinghamradha safetyandefficacyofhydroxychloroquineasprophylacticagainstcovid19inhealthcareworkersametaanalysisofrandomisedclinicaltrials |