Cargando…

Bibliometric Analysis on Global Analgesia in Labor from 2002 to 2021

BACKGROUND: Maternal pain during labor is one of the most important factors contributing to increased cesarean delivery rates and poor pregnancy outcomes, and this pain can be managed by labor analgesia. Many studies exist on labor analgesia, and the quantity and quality of these studies have not be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, Kang, Ding, Zhigang, Yang, Jiaojiao, Han, Xue, Li, Tianzuo, Miao, Huihui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10277021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37337609
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S416142
_version_ 1785060202648698880
author Yu, Kang
Ding, Zhigang
Yang, Jiaojiao
Han, Xue
Li, Tianzuo
Miao, Huihui
author_facet Yu, Kang
Ding, Zhigang
Yang, Jiaojiao
Han, Xue
Li, Tianzuo
Miao, Huihui
author_sort Yu, Kang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Maternal pain during labor is one of the most important factors contributing to increased cesarean delivery rates and poor pregnancy outcomes, and this pain can be managed by labor analgesia. Many studies exist on labor analgesia, and the quantity and quality of these studies have not been reported. Therefore, we aimed to perform a bibliometric analysis of studies from 2002 to 2021. METHODS: We used the Web of Science database to obtain publications related to labor analgesia from January 2002 to December 2021. Various bibliographic information was collected, including country; author; journal; grant; discipline; institution and research hotspot. A total of 4536 papers were included. RESULTS: A total of 4536 articles were included in the study. The country with the most published articles on labor analgesia and the country of the funding agency was the United States. Most articles were published in the disciplines Anesthesiology and Obstetrics & Gynecology. The journal that published the most articles in this category was International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia. In addition, we found different research hotspots for labor analgesia in the United States, Japan, and China. CONCLUSION: This paper provides a bibliometric analysis of research on labor analgesia and highlights the differences in research hotspots for labor analgesia between countries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10277021
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102770212023-06-19 Bibliometric Analysis on Global Analgesia in Labor from 2002 to 2021 Yu, Kang Ding, Zhigang Yang, Jiaojiao Han, Xue Li, Tianzuo Miao, Huihui J Pain Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Maternal pain during labor is one of the most important factors contributing to increased cesarean delivery rates and poor pregnancy outcomes, and this pain can be managed by labor analgesia. Many studies exist on labor analgesia, and the quantity and quality of these studies have not been reported. Therefore, we aimed to perform a bibliometric analysis of studies from 2002 to 2021. METHODS: We used the Web of Science database to obtain publications related to labor analgesia from January 2002 to December 2021. Various bibliographic information was collected, including country; author; journal; grant; discipline; institution and research hotspot. A total of 4536 papers were included. RESULTS: A total of 4536 articles were included in the study. The country with the most published articles on labor analgesia and the country of the funding agency was the United States. Most articles were published in the disciplines Anesthesiology and Obstetrics & Gynecology. The journal that published the most articles in this category was International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia. In addition, we found different research hotspots for labor analgesia in the United States, Japan, and China. CONCLUSION: This paper provides a bibliometric analysis of research on labor analgesia and highlights the differences in research hotspots for labor analgesia between countries. Dove 2023-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10277021/ /pubmed/37337609 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S416142 Text en © 2023 Yu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Yu, Kang
Ding, Zhigang
Yang, Jiaojiao
Han, Xue
Li, Tianzuo
Miao, Huihui
Bibliometric Analysis on Global Analgesia in Labor from 2002 to 2021
title Bibliometric Analysis on Global Analgesia in Labor from 2002 to 2021
title_full Bibliometric Analysis on Global Analgesia in Labor from 2002 to 2021
title_fullStr Bibliometric Analysis on Global Analgesia in Labor from 2002 to 2021
title_full_unstemmed Bibliometric Analysis on Global Analgesia in Labor from 2002 to 2021
title_short Bibliometric Analysis on Global Analgesia in Labor from 2002 to 2021
title_sort bibliometric analysis on global analgesia in labor from 2002 to 2021
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10277021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37337609
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S416142
work_keys_str_mv AT yukang bibliometricanalysisonglobalanalgesiainlaborfrom2002to2021
AT dingzhigang bibliometricanalysisonglobalanalgesiainlaborfrom2002to2021
AT yangjiaojiao bibliometricanalysisonglobalanalgesiainlaborfrom2002to2021
AT hanxue bibliometricanalysisonglobalanalgesiainlaborfrom2002to2021
AT litianzuo bibliometricanalysisonglobalanalgesiainlaborfrom2002to2021
AT miaohuihui bibliometricanalysisonglobalanalgesiainlaborfrom2002to2021