Cargando…

Can we do better? A qualitative study in the East of England investigating patient experience and acceptability of using the faecal immunochemical test in primary care

OBJECTIVES: The faecal immunochemical test (FIT) is increasingly used in UK primary care to triage patients presenting with symptoms and at different levels of colorectal cancer risk. Evidence is scarce on patients’ views of using FIT in this context. We aimed to explore patients’ care experience an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Snudden, Claudia M, Calanzani, Natalia, Archer, Stephanie, Honey, Stephanie, Pannebakker, Merel M, Faher, Anissa, Chang, Aina, Hamilton, Willie, Walter, Fiona M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10277082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37316310
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072359
_version_ 1785060214921232384
author Snudden, Claudia M
Calanzani, Natalia
Archer, Stephanie
Honey, Stephanie
Pannebakker, Merel M
Faher, Anissa
Chang, Aina
Hamilton, Willie
Walter, Fiona M
author_facet Snudden, Claudia M
Calanzani, Natalia
Archer, Stephanie
Honey, Stephanie
Pannebakker, Merel M
Faher, Anissa
Chang, Aina
Hamilton, Willie
Walter, Fiona M
author_sort Snudden, Claudia M
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The faecal immunochemical test (FIT) is increasingly used in UK primary care to triage patients presenting with symptoms and at different levels of colorectal cancer risk. Evidence is scarce on patients’ views of using FIT in this context. We aimed to explore patients’ care experience and acceptability of using FIT in primary care. DESIGN: A qualitative semi-structured interview study. Interviews were conducted via Zoom between April and October 2020. Transcribed recordings were analysed using framework analysis. SETTING: East of England general practices. PARTICIPANTS: Consenting patients (aged ≥40 years) who presented in primary care with possible symptoms of colorectal cancer, and for whom a FIT was requested, were recruited to the FIT-East study. Participants were purposively sampled for this qualitative substudy based on age, gender and FIT result. RESULTS: 44 participants were interviewed with a mean age 61 years, and 25 (57%) being men: 8 (18%) received a positive FIT result. Three themes and seven subthemes were identified. Participants’ familiarity with similar tests and perceived risk of cancer influenced test experience and acceptability. All participants were happy to do the FIT themselves and to recommend it to others. Most participants reported that the test was straightforward, although some considered it may be a challenge to others. However, test explanation by healthcare professionals was often limited. Furthermore, while some participants received their results quickly, many did not receive them at all with the common assumption that ‘no news is good news’. For those with a negative result and persisting symptoms, there was uncertainty about any next steps. CONCLUSIONS: While FIT is acceptable to patients, elements of communication with patients by the healthcare system show potential for improvement. We suggest possible ways to improve the FIT experience, particularly regarding communication about the test and its results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10277082
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102770822023-06-19 Can we do better? A qualitative study in the East of England investigating patient experience and acceptability of using the faecal immunochemical test in primary care Snudden, Claudia M Calanzani, Natalia Archer, Stephanie Honey, Stephanie Pannebakker, Merel M Faher, Anissa Chang, Aina Hamilton, Willie Walter, Fiona M BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVES: The faecal immunochemical test (FIT) is increasingly used in UK primary care to triage patients presenting with symptoms and at different levels of colorectal cancer risk. Evidence is scarce on patients’ views of using FIT in this context. We aimed to explore patients’ care experience and acceptability of using FIT in primary care. DESIGN: A qualitative semi-structured interview study. Interviews were conducted via Zoom between April and October 2020. Transcribed recordings were analysed using framework analysis. SETTING: East of England general practices. PARTICIPANTS: Consenting patients (aged ≥40 years) who presented in primary care with possible symptoms of colorectal cancer, and for whom a FIT was requested, were recruited to the FIT-East study. Participants were purposively sampled for this qualitative substudy based on age, gender and FIT result. RESULTS: 44 participants were interviewed with a mean age 61 years, and 25 (57%) being men: 8 (18%) received a positive FIT result. Three themes and seven subthemes were identified. Participants’ familiarity with similar tests and perceived risk of cancer influenced test experience and acceptability. All participants were happy to do the FIT themselves and to recommend it to others. Most participants reported that the test was straightforward, although some considered it may be a challenge to others. However, test explanation by healthcare professionals was often limited. Furthermore, while some participants received their results quickly, many did not receive them at all with the common assumption that ‘no news is good news’. For those with a negative result and persisting symptoms, there was uncertainty about any next steps. CONCLUSIONS: While FIT is acceptable to patients, elements of communication with patients by the healthcare system show potential for improvement. We suggest possible ways to improve the FIT experience, particularly regarding communication about the test and its results. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10277082/ /pubmed/37316310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072359 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle General practice / Family practice
Snudden, Claudia M
Calanzani, Natalia
Archer, Stephanie
Honey, Stephanie
Pannebakker, Merel M
Faher, Anissa
Chang, Aina
Hamilton, Willie
Walter, Fiona M
Can we do better? A qualitative study in the East of England investigating patient experience and acceptability of using the faecal immunochemical test in primary care
title Can we do better? A qualitative study in the East of England investigating patient experience and acceptability of using the faecal immunochemical test in primary care
title_full Can we do better? A qualitative study in the East of England investigating patient experience and acceptability of using the faecal immunochemical test in primary care
title_fullStr Can we do better? A qualitative study in the East of England investigating patient experience and acceptability of using the faecal immunochemical test in primary care
title_full_unstemmed Can we do better? A qualitative study in the East of England investigating patient experience and acceptability of using the faecal immunochemical test in primary care
title_short Can we do better? A qualitative study in the East of England investigating patient experience and acceptability of using the faecal immunochemical test in primary care
title_sort can we do better? a qualitative study in the east of england investigating patient experience and acceptability of using the faecal immunochemical test in primary care
topic General practice / Family practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10277082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37316310
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072359
work_keys_str_mv AT snuddenclaudiam canwedobetteraqualitativestudyintheeastofenglandinvestigatingpatientexperienceandacceptabilityofusingthefaecalimmunochemicaltestinprimarycare
AT calanzaninatalia canwedobetteraqualitativestudyintheeastofenglandinvestigatingpatientexperienceandacceptabilityofusingthefaecalimmunochemicaltestinprimarycare
AT archerstephanie canwedobetteraqualitativestudyintheeastofenglandinvestigatingpatientexperienceandacceptabilityofusingthefaecalimmunochemicaltestinprimarycare
AT honeystephanie canwedobetteraqualitativestudyintheeastofenglandinvestigatingpatientexperienceandacceptabilityofusingthefaecalimmunochemicaltestinprimarycare
AT pannebakkermerelm canwedobetteraqualitativestudyintheeastofenglandinvestigatingpatientexperienceandacceptabilityofusingthefaecalimmunochemicaltestinprimarycare
AT faheranissa canwedobetteraqualitativestudyintheeastofenglandinvestigatingpatientexperienceandacceptabilityofusingthefaecalimmunochemicaltestinprimarycare
AT changaina canwedobetteraqualitativestudyintheeastofenglandinvestigatingpatientexperienceandacceptabilityofusingthefaecalimmunochemicaltestinprimarycare
AT hamiltonwillie canwedobetteraqualitativestudyintheeastofenglandinvestigatingpatientexperienceandacceptabilityofusingthefaecalimmunochemicaltestinprimarycare
AT walterfionam canwedobetteraqualitativestudyintheeastofenglandinvestigatingpatientexperienceandacceptabilityofusingthefaecalimmunochemicaltestinprimarycare