Cargando…

Scoping review on the use of South-South learning exchange to scale up evidence-based practices in family planning

BACKGROUND: South-South learning exchange (SSLE) is an interactive learning process where teams from low-income and middle-income countries exchange knowledge and experience to support one or both team’s work towards a change in policies, programmes or practices. SSLE has been used by countries to i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Allagh, Komal Preet, Triulzi, Isotta, Kiarie, James, Kabra, Rita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10277101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37316440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-011635
_version_ 1785060218559791104
author Allagh, Komal Preet
Triulzi, Isotta
Kiarie, James
Kabra, Rita
author_facet Allagh, Komal Preet
Triulzi, Isotta
Kiarie, James
Kabra, Rita
author_sort Allagh, Komal Preet
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: South-South learning exchange (SSLE) is an interactive learning process where teams from low-income and middle-income countries exchange knowledge and experience to support one or both team’s work towards a change in policies, programmes or practices. SSLE has been used by countries to improve family planning (FP) outcomes such as increased contraceptive prevalence rate and reduced unmet need for FP, but at present, there are no reviews that summarise its use. We conducted a scoping review with stakeholder consultations to summarise the use of SSLE to change FP outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To systematically identify and map the purposes, approaches, outputs, outcomes, enablers and barriers to using SSLE in FP. METHODS: A search was conducted on electronic databases, grey literature sources, websites and the reference list of included studies. The scoping review is based on an adapted version of Arksey and O’Malley’s scoping review framework suggested by Levac et al. Experts were interviewed on their experiences in SSLE. RESULTS: The initial search yielded 1483 articles; however, only 29 were selected in the final analysis. The articles were published between 2008 and 2022. Most of the articles were reports, case studies or press releases, only two were peer-reviewed publications. Capacity building of FP providers, policy-makers and community was the most commonly reported purpose of SSLE, with study tours (57%) being the most common approach. Policy dialogue was the most common (45%) output and improved contraceptive prevalence was the most frequently reported outcome. The experiences of the 16 interviewed experts aligned with the scoping review findings. CONCLUSION: The evidence on the effectiveness of SSLE for addressing FP outcomes is very limited and of very low quality. We call on stakeholders conducting SSLE to document their experiences in detail, including the outcomes achieved.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10277101
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102771012023-06-19 Scoping review on the use of South-South learning exchange to scale up evidence-based practices in family planning Allagh, Komal Preet Triulzi, Isotta Kiarie, James Kabra, Rita BMJ Glob Health Original Research BACKGROUND: South-South learning exchange (SSLE) is an interactive learning process where teams from low-income and middle-income countries exchange knowledge and experience to support one or both team’s work towards a change in policies, programmes or practices. SSLE has been used by countries to improve family planning (FP) outcomes such as increased contraceptive prevalence rate and reduced unmet need for FP, but at present, there are no reviews that summarise its use. We conducted a scoping review with stakeholder consultations to summarise the use of SSLE to change FP outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To systematically identify and map the purposes, approaches, outputs, outcomes, enablers and barriers to using SSLE in FP. METHODS: A search was conducted on electronic databases, grey literature sources, websites and the reference list of included studies. The scoping review is based on an adapted version of Arksey and O’Malley’s scoping review framework suggested by Levac et al. Experts were interviewed on their experiences in SSLE. RESULTS: The initial search yielded 1483 articles; however, only 29 were selected in the final analysis. The articles were published between 2008 and 2022. Most of the articles were reports, case studies or press releases, only two were peer-reviewed publications. Capacity building of FP providers, policy-makers and community was the most commonly reported purpose of SSLE, with study tours (57%) being the most common approach. Policy dialogue was the most common (45%) output and improved contraceptive prevalence was the most frequently reported outcome. The experiences of the 16 interviewed experts aligned with the scoping review findings. CONCLUSION: The evidence on the effectiveness of SSLE for addressing FP outcomes is very limited and of very low quality. We call on stakeholders conducting SSLE to document their experiences in detail, including the outcomes achieved. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10277101/ /pubmed/37316440 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-011635 Text en © World Health Organization 2023. Licensee BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution IGO License (CC BY 3.0 IGO (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/) ), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. In any reproduction of this article there should not be any suggestion that WHO or this article endorse any specific organization or products. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. This notice should be preserved along with the article’s original URL.
spellingShingle Original Research
Allagh, Komal Preet
Triulzi, Isotta
Kiarie, James
Kabra, Rita
Scoping review on the use of South-South learning exchange to scale up evidence-based practices in family planning
title Scoping review on the use of South-South learning exchange to scale up evidence-based practices in family planning
title_full Scoping review on the use of South-South learning exchange to scale up evidence-based practices in family planning
title_fullStr Scoping review on the use of South-South learning exchange to scale up evidence-based practices in family planning
title_full_unstemmed Scoping review on the use of South-South learning exchange to scale up evidence-based practices in family planning
title_short Scoping review on the use of South-South learning exchange to scale up evidence-based practices in family planning
title_sort scoping review on the use of south-south learning exchange to scale up evidence-based practices in family planning
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10277101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37316440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-011635
work_keys_str_mv AT allaghkomalpreet scopingreviewontheuseofsouthsouthlearningexchangetoscaleupevidencebasedpracticesinfamilyplanning
AT triulziisotta scopingreviewontheuseofsouthsouthlearningexchangetoscaleupevidencebasedpracticesinfamilyplanning
AT kiariejames scopingreviewontheuseofsouthsouthlearningexchangetoscaleupevidencebasedpracticesinfamilyplanning
AT kabrarita scopingreviewontheuseofsouthsouthlearningexchangetoscaleupevidencebasedpracticesinfamilyplanning