Cargando…

Rehabilitation cooperation and person-centred dialogue meeting for patients sick-listed for common mental disorders: 12 months follow-up of sick leave days, symptoms of depression, anxiety, stress and work ability – a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial from the CO-WORK-CARE project

OBJECTIVES: To study whether early and enhanced cooperation within the primary care centres (PCC) combined with workplace cooperation via a person-centred employer dialogue meeting can reduce days on sick leave compared with usual care manager contact for patients on sick leave because of common men...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Björkelund, Cecilia, Saxvik, Ausra, Svenningsson, Irene, Petersson, Eva-Lisa, Wiegner, Lilian, Larsson, Maria, Törnbom, Karin, Wikberg, Carl, Ariai, Nashmil, Nejati, Shabnam, Hensing, Gunnel, Hange, Dominique
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10277141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37295824
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074137
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: To study whether early and enhanced cooperation within the primary care centres (PCC) combined with workplace cooperation via a person-centred employer dialogue meeting can reduce days on sick leave compared with usual care manager contact for patients on sick leave because of common mental disorders (CMD). Secondary aim: to study lapse of CMD symptoms, perceived Work Ability Index (WAI) and quality of life (QoL) during 12 months. DESIGN: Pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial, randomisation at PCC level. SETTING: 28 PCCs in Region Västra Götaland, Sweden, with care manager organisation. PARTICIPANTS: 30 PCCs were invited, 28 (93%) accepted invitation (14 intervention, 14 control) and recruited 341 patients newly sick-listed because of CMD (n=185 at intervention, n=156 at control PCCs). INTERVENTION: Complex intervention consisting of (1) early cooperation among general practitioner (GP), care manager and a rehabilitation coordinator, plus (2) a person-centred dialogue meeting between patient and employer within 3 months. Control group: regular contact with care manager. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: 12 months net and gross number of sick leave days at group level. Secondary outcomes: 12 months depression, anxiety, stress symptoms, perceived WAI and QoL (EuroQoL-5 Dimensional, EQ-5D). RESULTS: No significant differences were found between intervention and control groups concerning days of sick leave (intervention net days of sick leave mean 102.48 (SE 13.76) vs control 96.29 (SE 12.38) p=0.73), return to work (HR 0.881, 95% CI 0.688 to 1.128), or CMD symptoms, WAI or EQ-5D after 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: It is not possible to speed up CMD patients’ return to work or to reduce sick leave time by early and enhanced coordination among GP, care manager and a rehabilitation coordinator, combined with early workplace contact over and above what ‘usual’ care manager contact during 3 months provides. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03250026.