Cargando…

Developing a patient decision aid for Achilles tendon rupture management: a mixed-methods study

OBJECTIVE: To develop and user-test a patient decision aid portraying the benefits and harms of non-surgical management and surgery for Achilles tendon ruptures. DESIGN: Mixed methods. SETTING: A draft decision aid was developed using guidance from a multidisciplinary steering group and existing pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gan, Jan F L, McKay, Marnee J, Jones, Caitlin M P, Harris, Ian A, McCaffery, Kirsten, Thompson, Rachel, Hoffmann, Tammy C, Adie, Sam, Maher, Christopher G, Zadro, Joshua R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10277142/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37316308
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072553
_version_ 1785060227281846272
author Gan, Jan F L
McKay, Marnee J
Jones, Caitlin M P
Harris, Ian A
McCaffery, Kirsten
Thompson, Rachel
Hoffmann, Tammy C
Adie, Sam
Maher, Christopher G
Zadro, Joshua R
author_facet Gan, Jan F L
McKay, Marnee J
Jones, Caitlin M P
Harris, Ian A
McCaffery, Kirsten
Thompson, Rachel
Hoffmann, Tammy C
Adie, Sam
Maher, Christopher G
Zadro, Joshua R
author_sort Gan, Jan F L
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To develop and user-test a patient decision aid portraying the benefits and harms of non-surgical management and surgery for Achilles tendon ruptures. DESIGN: Mixed methods. SETTING: A draft decision aid was developed using guidance from a multidisciplinary steering group and existing patient decision aids. Participants were recruited through social media. PARTICIPANTS: People who have previously sustained an Achilles tendon rupture and health professionals who manage these patients. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Semi-structured interviews and questionnaires were used to gather feedback on the decision aid from health professionals and patients who had previously suffered an Achilles tendon rupture. The feedback was used to redraft the decision aid and assess acceptability. An iterative cycle of interviews, redrafting according to feedback and further interviews was used. Interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Questionnaire data were analysed descriptively. RESULTS: We interviewed 18 health professionals (13 physiotherapists, 3 orthopaedic surgeons, 1 chiropractor, 1 sports medicine physician) and 15 patients who had suffered an Achilles tendon rupture (median time since rupture was 12 months). Most health professionals and patients rated the aid’s acceptability as good-excellent. Interviews showcased agreement among health professionals and patients on most aspects of the decision aid: introduction, treatment options, comparing benefits and harms, questions to ask health professionals and formatting. However, health professionals had differing views on details about Achilles tendon retraction distance, factors that modify the risk of harms, treatment protocols and evidence on benefits and harms. CONCLUSION: Our patient decision aid is an acceptable tool to both patients and health professionals, and our study highlights the views of key stakeholders on important information to consider when developing a patient decision aid for Achilles tendon rupture management. A randomised controlled trial evaluating the impact of this tool on the decision-making of people considering Achilles tendon surgery is warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10277142
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102771422023-06-19 Developing a patient decision aid for Achilles tendon rupture management: a mixed-methods study Gan, Jan F L McKay, Marnee J Jones, Caitlin M P Harris, Ian A McCaffery, Kirsten Thompson, Rachel Hoffmann, Tammy C Adie, Sam Maher, Christopher G Zadro, Joshua R BMJ Open Surgery OBJECTIVE: To develop and user-test a patient decision aid portraying the benefits and harms of non-surgical management and surgery for Achilles tendon ruptures. DESIGN: Mixed methods. SETTING: A draft decision aid was developed using guidance from a multidisciplinary steering group and existing patient decision aids. Participants were recruited through social media. PARTICIPANTS: People who have previously sustained an Achilles tendon rupture and health professionals who manage these patients. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Semi-structured interviews and questionnaires were used to gather feedback on the decision aid from health professionals and patients who had previously suffered an Achilles tendon rupture. The feedback was used to redraft the decision aid and assess acceptability. An iterative cycle of interviews, redrafting according to feedback and further interviews was used. Interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Questionnaire data were analysed descriptively. RESULTS: We interviewed 18 health professionals (13 physiotherapists, 3 orthopaedic surgeons, 1 chiropractor, 1 sports medicine physician) and 15 patients who had suffered an Achilles tendon rupture (median time since rupture was 12 months). Most health professionals and patients rated the aid’s acceptability as good-excellent. Interviews showcased agreement among health professionals and patients on most aspects of the decision aid: introduction, treatment options, comparing benefits and harms, questions to ask health professionals and formatting. However, health professionals had differing views on details about Achilles tendon retraction distance, factors that modify the risk of harms, treatment protocols and evidence on benefits and harms. CONCLUSION: Our patient decision aid is an acceptable tool to both patients and health professionals, and our study highlights the views of key stakeholders on important information to consider when developing a patient decision aid for Achilles tendon rupture management. A randomised controlled trial evaluating the impact of this tool on the decision-making of people considering Achilles tendon surgery is warranted. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10277142/ /pubmed/37316308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072553 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Surgery
Gan, Jan F L
McKay, Marnee J
Jones, Caitlin M P
Harris, Ian A
McCaffery, Kirsten
Thompson, Rachel
Hoffmann, Tammy C
Adie, Sam
Maher, Christopher G
Zadro, Joshua R
Developing a patient decision aid for Achilles tendon rupture management: a mixed-methods study
title Developing a patient decision aid for Achilles tendon rupture management: a mixed-methods study
title_full Developing a patient decision aid for Achilles tendon rupture management: a mixed-methods study
title_fullStr Developing a patient decision aid for Achilles tendon rupture management: a mixed-methods study
title_full_unstemmed Developing a patient decision aid for Achilles tendon rupture management: a mixed-methods study
title_short Developing a patient decision aid for Achilles tendon rupture management: a mixed-methods study
title_sort developing a patient decision aid for achilles tendon rupture management: a mixed-methods study
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10277142/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37316308
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072553
work_keys_str_mv AT ganjanfl developingapatientdecisionaidforachillestendonrupturemanagementamixedmethodsstudy
AT mckaymarneej developingapatientdecisionaidforachillestendonrupturemanagementamixedmethodsstudy
AT jonescaitlinmp developingapatientdecisionaidforachillestendonrupturemanagementamixedmethodsstudy
AT harrisiana developingapatientdecisionaidforachillestendonrupturemanagementamixedmethodsstudy
AT mccafferykirsten developingapatientdecisionaidforachillestendonrupturemanagementamixedmethodsstudy
AT thompsonrachel developingapatientdecisionaidforachillestendonrupturemanagementamixedmethodsstudy
AT hoffmanntammyc developingapatientdecisionaidforachillestendonrupturemanagementamixedmethodsstudy
AT adiesam developingapatientdecisionaidforachillestendonrupturemanagementamixedmethodsstudy
AT maherchristopherg developingapatientdecisionaidforachillestendonrupturemanagementamixedmethodsstudy
AT zadrojoshuar developingapatientdecisionaidforachillestendonrupturemanagementamixedmethodsstudy