Cargando…
Developing a patient decision aid for Achilles tendon rupture management: a mixed-methods study
OBJECTIVE: To develop and user-test a patient decision aid portraying the benefits and harms of non-surgical management and surgery for Achilles tendon ruptures. DESIGN: Mixed methods. SETTING: A draft decision aid was developed using guidance from a multidisciplinary steering group and existing pat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10277142/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37316308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072553 |
_version_ | 1785060227281846272 |
---|---|
author | Gan, Jan F L McKay, Marnee J Jones, Caitlin M P Harris, Ian A McCaffery, Kirsten Thompson, Rachel Hoffmann, Tammy C Adie, Sam Maher, Christopher G Zadro, Joshua R |
author_facet | Gan, Jan F L McKay, Marnee J Jones, Caitlin M P Harris, Ian A McCaffery, Kirsten Thompson, Rachel Hoffmann, Tammy C Adie, Sam Maher, Christopher G Zadro, Joshua R |
author_sort | Gan, Jan F L |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To develop and user-test a patient decision aid portraying the benefits and harms of non-surgical management and surgery for Achilles tendon ruptures. DESIGN: Mixed methods. SETTING: A draft decision aid was developed using guidance from a multidisciplinary steering group and existing patient decision aids. Participants were recruited through social media. PARTICIPANTS: People who have previously sustained an Achilles tendon rupture and health professionals who manage these patients. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Semi-structured interviews and questionnaires were used to gather feedback on the decision aid from health professionals and patients who had previously suffered an Achilles tendon rupture. The feedback was used to redraft the decision aid and assess acceptability. An iterative cycle of interviews, redrafting according to feedback and further interviews was used. Interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Questionnaire data were analysed descriptively. RESULTS: We interviewed 18 health professionals (13 physiotherapists, 3 orthopaedic surgeons, 1 chiropractor, 1 sports medicine physician) and 15 patients who had suffered an Achilles tendon rupture (median time since rupture was 12 months). Most health professionals and patients rated the aid’s acceptability as good-excellent. Interviews showcased agreement among health professionals and patients on most aspects of the decision aid: introduction, treatment options, comparing benefits and harms, questions to ask health professionals and formatting. However, health professionals had differing views on details about Achilles tendon retraction distance, factors that modify the risk of harms, treatment protocols and evidence on benefits and harms. CONCLUSION: Our patient decision aid is an acceptable tool to both patients and health professionals, and our study highlights the views of key stakeholders on important information to consider when developing a patient decision aid for Achilles tendon rupture management. A randomised controlled trial evaluating the impact of this tool on the decision-making of people considering Achilles tendon surgery is warranted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10277142 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102771422023-06-19 Developing a patient decision aid for Achilles tendon rupture management: a mixed-methods study Gan, Jan F L McKay, Marnee J Jones, Caitlin M P Harris, Ian A McCaffery, Kirsten Thompson, Rachel Hoffmann, Tammy C Adie, Sam Maher, Christopher G Zadro, Joshua R BMJ Open Surgery OBJECTIVE: To develop and user-test a patient decision aid portraying the benefits and harms of non-surgical management and surgery for Achilles tendon ruptures. DESIGN: Mixed methods. SETTING: A draft decision aid was developed using guidance from a multidisciplinary steering group and existing patient decision aids. Participants were recruited through social media. PARTICIPANTS: People who have previously sustained an Achilles tendon rupture and health professionals who manage these patients. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Semi-structured interviews and questionnaires were used to gather feedback on the decision aid from health professionals and patients who had previously suffered an Achilles tendon rupture. The feedback was used to redraft the decision aid and assess acceptability. An iterative cycle of interviews, redrafting according to feedback and further interviews was used. Interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Questionnaire data were analysed descriptively. RESULTS: We interviewed 18 health professionals (13 physiotherapists, 3 orthopaedic surgeons, 1 chiropractor, 1 sports medicine physician) and 15 patients who had suffered an Achilles tendon rupture (median time since rupture was 12 months). Most health professionals and patients rated the aid’s acceptability as good-excellent. Interviews showcased agreement among health professionals and patients on most aspects of the decision aid: introduction, treatment options, comparing benefits and harms, questions to ask health professionals and formatting. However, health professionals had differing views on details about Achilles tendon retraction distance, factors that modify the risk of harms, treatment protocols and evidence on benefits and harms. CONCLUSION: Our patient decision aid is an acceptable tool to both patients and health professionals, and our study highlights the views of key stakeholders on important information to consider when developing a patient decision aid for Achilles tendon rupture management. A randomised controlled trial evaluating the impact of this tool on the decision-making of people considering Achilles tendon surgery is warranted. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10277142/ /pubmed/37316308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072553 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Surgery Gan, Jan F L McKay, Marnee J Jones, Caitlin M P Harris, Ian A McCaffery, Kirsten Thompson, Rachel Hoffmann, Tammy C Adie, Sam Maher, Christopher G Zadro, Joshua R Developing a patient decision aid for Achilles tendon rupture management: a mixed-methods study |
title | Developing a patient decision aid for Achilles tendon rupture management: a mixed-methods study |
title_full | Developing a patient decision aid for Achilles tendon rupture management: a mixed-methods study |
title_fullStr | Developing a patient decision aid for Achilles tendon rupture management: a mixed-methods study |
title_full_unstemmed | Developing a patient decision aid for Achilles tendon rupture management: a mixed-methods study |
title_short | Developing a patient decision aid for Achilles tendon rupture management: a mixed-methods study |
title_sort | developing a patient decision aid for achilles tendon rupture management: a mixed-methods study |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10277142/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37316308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072553 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ganjanfl developingapatientdecisionaidforachillestendonrupturemanagementamixedmethodsstudy AT mckaymarneej developingapatientdecisionaidforachillestendonrupturemanagementamixedmethodsstudy AT jonescaitlinmp developingapatientdecisionaidforachillestendonrupturemanagementamixedmethodsstudy AT harrisiana developingapatientdecisionaidforachillestendonrupturemanagementamixedmethodsstudy AT mccafferykirsten developingapatientdecisionaidforachillestendonrupturemanagementamixedmethodsstudy AT thompsonrachel developingapatientdecisionaidforachillestendonrupturemanagementamixedmethodsstudy AT hoffmanntammyc developingapatientdecisionaidforachillestendonrupturemanagementamixedmethodsstudy AT adiesam developingapatientdecisionaidforachillestendonrupturemanagementamixedmethodsstudy AT maherchristopherg developingapatientdecisionaidforachillestendonrupturemanagementamixedmethodsstudy AT zadrojoshuar developingapatientdecisionaidforachillestendonrupturemanagementamixedmethodsstudy |