Cargando…

Impact of primary care usual provider type and provider interdependence on outcomes for patients with diabetes: a cohort study

BACKGROUND: Interprofessional primary care (PC) teams are key to the provision of high-quality care. PC providers often ‘share’ patients (eg, a patient may see multiple providers in the same clinic), resulting in between-visit interdependence between providers. However, concern remains that PC provi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Everett, Christine, Christy, Jacob, Batchelder, Heather, Morgan, Perri A, Docherty, Sharron, Smith, Valerie A, Anderson, John B, Viera, Anthony, Jackson, George L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10277144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37311623
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002229
_version_ 1785060227770482688
author Everett, Christine
Christy, Jacob
Batchelder, Heather
Morgan, Perri A
Docherty, Sharron
Smith, Valerie A
Anderson, John B
Viera, Anthony
Jackson, George L
author_facet Everett, Christine
Christy, Jacob
Batchelder, Heather
Morgan, Perri A
Docherty, Sharron
Smith, Valerie A
Anderson, John B
Viera, Anthony
Jackson, George L
author_sort Everett, Christine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Interprofessional primary care (PC) teams are key to the provision of high-quality care. PC providers often ‘share’ patients (eg, a patient may see multiple providers in the same clinic), resulting in between-visit interdependence between providers. However, concern remains that PC provider interdependence will reduce quality of care, causing some organisations to hesitate in creating multiple provider teams. If PC provider teams are formalised, the PC usual provider of care (UPC) type (physician, nurse practitioner (NP) or physician assistant/associate (PA)) should be determined for patients with varying levels of medical complexity. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of PC provider interdependence, UPC type and patient complexity on diabetes-specific outcomes for adult patients with diabetes. DESIGN: Cohort study using electronic health record data from 26 PC practices in central North Carolina, USA. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients with diabetes (N=10 498) who received PC in 2016 and 2017. OUTCOME: Testing for diabetes control, testing for lipid levels, mean glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) values and mean low-density lipoprotein (LDL) values in 2017. RESULTS: Receipt of guideline recommended testing was high (72% for HbA1c and 66% for LDL testing), HbA1c values were 7.5% and LDL values were 88.5 mg/dL. When controlling for a range of patient and panel level variables, increases in PC provider interdependence were not significantly associated with diabetes-specific outcomes. Similarly, there were no significant differences in the diabetes outcomes for patients with NP/PA UPCs when compared with physicians. The number and type of a patient’s chronic conditions did impact the receipt of testing, but not average values for HbA1c and LDL. CONCLUSIONS: A range of UPC types on PC multiple provider teams can deliver guideline-recommended diabetes care. However, the number and type of a patient’s chronic conditions alone impacted the receipt of testing, but not average values for HbA1c and LDL.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10277144
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102771442023-06-19 Impact of primary care usual provider type and provider interdependence on outcomes for patients with diabetes: a cohort study Everett, Christine Christy, Jacob Batchelder, Heather Morgan, Perri A Docherty, Sharron Smith, Valerie A Anderson, John B Viera, Anthony Jackson, George L BMJ Open Qual Original Research BACKGROUND: Interprofessional primary care (PC) teams are key to the provision of high-quality care. PC providers often ‘share’ patients (eg, a patient may see multiple providers in the same clinic), resulting in between-visit interdependence between providers. However, concern remains that PC provider interdependence will reduce quality of care, causing some organisations to hesitate in creating multiple provider teams. If PC provider teams are formalised, the PC usual provider of care (UPC) type (physician, nurse practitioner (NP) or physician assistant/associate (PA)) should be determined for patients with varying levels of medical complexity. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of PC provider interdependence, UPC type and patient complexity on diabetes-specific outcomes for adult patients with diabetes. DESIGN: Cohort study using electronic health record data from 26 PC practices in central North Carolina, USA. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients with diabetes (N=10 498) who received PC in 2016 and 2017. OUTCOME: Testing for diabetes control, testing for lipid levels, mean glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) values and mean low-density lipoprotein (LDL) values in 2017. RESULTS: Receipt of guideline recommended testing was high (72% for HbA1c and 66% for LDL testing), HbA1c values were 7.5% and LDL values were 88.5 mg/dL. When controlling for a range of patient and panel level variables, increases in PC provider interdependence were not significantly associated with diabetes-specific outcomes. Similarly, there were no significant differences in the diabetes outcomes for patients with NP/PA UPCs when compared with physicians. The number and type of a patient’s chronic conditions did impact the receipt of testing, but not average values for HbA1c and LDL. CONCLUSIONS: A range of UPC types on PC multiple provider teams can deliver guideline-recommended diabetes care. However, the number and type of a patient’s chronic conditions alone impacted the receipt of testing, but not average values for HbA1c and LDL. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10277144/ /pubmed/37311623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002229 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Everett, Christine
Christy, Jacob
Batchelder, Heather
Morgan, Perri A
Docherty, Sharron
Smith, Valerie A
Anderson, John B
Viera, Anthony
Jackson, George L
Impact of primary care usual provider type and provider interdependence on outcomes for patients with diabetes: a cohort study
title Impact of primary care usual provider type and provider interdependence on outcomes for patients with diabetes: a cohort study
title_full Impact of primary care usual provider type and provider interdependence on outcomes for patients with diabetes: a cohort study
title_fullStr Impact of primary care usual provider type and provider interdependence on outcomes for patients with diabetes: a cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Impact of primary care usual provider type and provider interdependence on outcomes for patients with diabetes: a cohort study
title_short Impact of primary care usual provider type and provider interdependence on outcomes for patients with diabetes: a cohort study
title_sort impact of primary care usual provider type and provider interdependence on outcomes for patients with diabetes: a cohort study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10277144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37311623
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002229
work_keys_str_mv AT everettchristine impactofprimarycareusualprovidertypeandproviderinterdependenceonoutcomesforpatientswithdiabetesacohortstudy
AT christyjacob impactofprimarycareusualprovidertypeandproviderinterdependenceonoutcomesforpatientswithdiabetesacohortstudy
AT batchelderheather impactofprimarycareusualprovidertypeandproviderinterdependenceonoutcomesforpatientswithdiabetesacohortstudy
AT morganperria impactofprimarycareusualprovidertypeandproviderinterdependenceonoutcomesforpatientswithdiabetesacohortstudy
AT dochertysharron impactofprimarycareusualprovidertypeandproviderinterdependenceonoutcomesforpatientswithdiabetesacohortstudy
AT smithvaleriea impactofprimarycareusualprovidertypeandproviderinterdependenceonoutcomesforpatientswithdiabetesacohortstudy
AT andersonjohnb impactofprimarycareusualprovidertypeandproviderinterdependenceonoutcomesforpatientswithdiabetesacohortstudy
AT vieraanthony impactofprimarycareusualprovidertypeandproviderinterdependenceonoutcomesforpatientswithdiabetesacohortstudy
AT jacksongeorgel impactofprimarycareusualprovidertypeandproviderinterdependenceonoutcomesforpatientswithdiabetesacohortstudy