Cargando…

Conducting a systematic review and evaluation of commercially available mobile applications (apps) on a health-related topic: the TECH approach and a step-by-step methodological guide

OBJECTIVES: To provide an overview of the methodological considerations for conducting commercial smartphone health app reviews (mHealth reviews), with the aim of systematising the process and supporting high-quality evaluations of mHealth apps. DESIGN: Synthesis of our research team’s experiences o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gasteiger, Norina, Dowding, Dawn, Norman, Gill, McGarrigle, Lisa, Eost-Telling, Charlotte, Jones, Debra, Vercell, Amy, Ali, Syed Mustafa, O'Connor, Siobhan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10277147/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37308269
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073283
_version_ 1785060228501340160
author Gasteiger, Norina
Dowding, Dawn
Norman, Gill
McGarrigle, Lisa
Eost-Telling, Charlotte
Jones, Debra
Vercell, Amy
Ali, Syed Mustafa
O'Connor, Siobhan
author_facet Gasteiger, Norina
Dowding, Dawn
Norman, Gill
McGarrigle, Lisa
Eost-Telling, Charlotte
Jones, Debra
Vercell, Amy
Ali, Syed Mustafa
O'Connor, Siobhan
author_sort Gasteiger, Norina
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To provide an overview of the methodological considerations for conducting commercial smartphone health app reviews (mHealth reviews), with the aim of systematising the process and supporting high-quality evaluations of mHealth apps. DESIGN: Synthesis of our research team’s experiences of conducting and publishing various reviews of mHealth apps available on app stores and hand-searching the top medical informatics journals (eg, The Lancet Digital Health, npj Digital Medicine, Journal of Biomedical Informatics and the Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association) over the last five years (2018–2022) to identify other app reviews to contribute to the discussion of this method and supporting framework for developing a research (review) question and determining the eligibility criteria. RESULTS: We present seven steps to support rigour in conducting reviews of health apps available on the app market: (1) writing a research question or aims, (2) conducting scoping searches and developing the protocol, (3) determining the eligibility criteria using the TECH framework, (4) conducting the final search and screening of health apps, (5) data extraction, (6) quality, functionality and other assessments and (7) analysis and synthesis of findings. We introduce the novel TECH approach to developing review questions and the eligibility criteria, which considers the Target user, Evaluation focus, Connectedness and the Health domain. Patient and public involvement and engagement opportunities are acknowledged, including co-developing the protocol and undertaking quality or usability assessments. CONCLUSION: Commercial mHealth app reviews can provide important insights into the health app market, including the availability of apps and their quality and functionality. We have outlined seven key steps for conducting rigorous health app reviews in addition to the TECH acronym, which can support researchers in writing research questions and determining the eligibility criteria. Future work will include a collaborative effort to develop reporting guidelines and a quality appraisal tool to ensure transparency and quality in systematic app reviews.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10277147
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102771472023-06-19 Conducting a systematic review and evaluation of commercially available mobile applications (apps) on a health-related topic: the TECH approach and a step-by-step methodological guide Gasteiger, Norina Dowding, Dawn Norman, Gill McGarrigle, Lisa Eost-Telling, Charlotte Jones, Debra Vercell, Amy Ali, Syed Mustafa O'Connor, Siobhan BMJ Open Research Methods OBJECTIVES: To provide an overview of the methodological considerations for conducting commercial smartphone health app reviews (mHealth reviews), with the aim of systematising the process and supporting high-quality evaluations of mHealth apps. DESIGN: Synthesis of our research team’s experiences of conducting and publishing various reviews of mHealth apps available on app stores and hand-searching the top medical informatics journals (eg, The Lancet Digital Health, npj Digital Medicine, Journal of Biomedical Informatics and the Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association) over the last five years (2018–2022) to identify other app reviews to contribute to the discussion of this method and supporting framework for developing a research (review) question and determining the eligibility criteria. RESULTS: We present seven steps to support rigour in conducting reviews of health apps available on the app market: (1) writing a research question or aims, (2) conducting scoping searches and developing the protocol, (3) determining the eligibility criteria using the TECH framework, (4) conducting the final search and screening of health apps, (5) data extraction, (6) quality, functionality and other assessments and (7) analysis and synthesis of findings. We introduce the novel TECH approach to developing review questions and the eligibility criteria, which considers the Target user, Evaluation focus, Connectedness and the Health domain. Patient and public involvement and engagement opportunities are acknowledged, including co-developing the protocol and undertaking quality or usability assessments. CONCLUSION: Commercial mHealth app reviews can provide important insights into the health app market, including the availability of apps and their quality and functionality. We have outlined seven key steps for conducting rigorous health app reviews in addition to the TECH acronym, which can support researchers in writing research questions and determining the eligibility criteria. Future work will include a collaborative effort to develop reporting guidelines and a quality appraisal tool to ensure transparency and quality in systematic app reviews. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10277147/ /pubmed/37308269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073283 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Methods
Gasteiger, Norina
Dowding, Dawn
Norman, Gill
McGarrigle, Lisa
Eost-Telling, Charlotte
Jones, Debra
Vercell, Amy
Ali, Syed Mustafa
O'Connor, Siobhan
Conducting a systematic review and evaluation of commercially available mobile applications (apps) on a health-related topic: the TECH approach and a step-by-step methodological guide
title Conducting a systematic review and evaluation of commercially available mobile applications (apps) on a health-related topic: the TECH approach and a step-by-step methodological guide
title_full Conducting a systematic review and evaluation of commercially available mobile applications (apps) on a health-related topic: the TECH approach and a step-by-step methodological guide
title_fullStr Conducting a systematic review and evaluation of commercially available mobile applications (apps) on a health-related topic: the TECH approach and a step-by-step methodological guide
title_full_unstemmed Conducting a systematic review and evaluation of commercially available mobile applications (apps) on a health-related topic: the TECH approach and a step-by-step methodological guide
title_short Conducting a systematic review and evaluation of commercially available mobile applications (apps) on a health-related topic: the TECH approach and a step-by-step methodological guide
title_sort conducting a systematic review and evaluation of commercially available mobile applications (apps) on a health-related topic: the tech approach and a step-by-step methodological guide
topic Research Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10277147/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37308269
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073283
work_keys_str_mv AT gasteigernorina conductingasystematicreviewandevaluationofcommerciallyavailablemobileapplicationsappsonahealthrelatedtopicthetechapproachandastepbystepmethodologicalguide
AT dowdingdawn conductingasystematicreviewandevaluationofcommerciallyavailablemobileapplicationsappsonahealthrelatedtopicthetechapproachandastepbystepmethodologicalguide
AT normangill conductingasystematicreviewandevaluationofcommerciallyavailablemobileapplicationsappsonahealthrelatedtopicthetechapproachandastepbystepmethodologicalguide
AT mcgarriglelisa conductingasystematicreviewandevaluationofcommerciallyavailablemobileapplicationsappsonahealthrelatedtopicthetechapproachandastepbystepmethodologicalguide
AT eosttellingcharlotte conductingasystematicreviewandevaluationofcommerciallyavailablemobileapplicationsappsonahealthrelatedtopicthetechapproachandastepbystepmethodologicalguide
AT jonesdebra conductingasystematicreviewandevaluationofcommerciallyavailablemobileapplicationsappsonahealthrelatedtopicthetechapproachandastepbystepmethodologicalguide
AT vercellamy conductingasystematicreviewandevaluationofcommerciallyavailablemobileapplicationsappsonahealthrelatedtopicthetechapproachandastepbystepmethodologicalguide
AT alisyedmustafa conductingasystematicreviewandevaluationofcommerciallyavailablemobileapplicationsappsonahealthrelatedtopicthetechapproachandastepbystepmethodologicalguide
AT oconnorsiobhan conductingasystematicreviewandevaluationofcommerciallyavailablemobileapplicationsappsonahealthrelatedtopicthetechapproachandastepbystepmethodologicalguide