Cargando…

Acute effects of a single neurodynamic mobilization session on range of motion and H‐reflex in asymptomatic young subjects: A controlled study

Neurodynamic techniques have yielded good clinical results in the treatment of various pathologies. The objective of this study is to examine the short‐term effects of neurodynamic techniques of the sciatic nerve on hip ROM (range of motion) and on the amplitude and latency of the soleus H‐reflex an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cancela, Álvaro, Arias, Pablo, Rodríguez‐Romero, Beatriz, Chouza‐Insua, Marcelo, Cudeiro, Javier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10277214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37332040
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15748
_version_ 1785060239334178816
author Cancela, Álvaro
Arias, Pablo
Rodríguez‐Romero, Beatriz
Chouza‐Insua, Marcelo
Cudeiro, Javier
author_facet Cancela, Álvaro
Arias, Pablo
Rodríguez‐Romero, Beatriz
Chouza‐Insua, Marcelo
Cudeiro, Javier
author_sort Cancela, Álvaro
collection PubMed
description Neurodynamic techniques have yielded good clinical results in the treatment of various pathologies. The objective of this study is to examine the short‐term effects of neurodynamic techniques of the sciatic nerve on hip ROM (range of motion) and on the amplitude and latency of the soleus H‐reflex and M‐waves, in young asymptomatic subjects. In a double‐blind controlled trial design, 60 young asymptomatic participants were randomly assigned into six groups with different levels of manipulation of the sciatic nerve. The passive straight leg raise test was used to evaluate the hip ROM amplitude. All evaluations were performed before, 1 min after, and 30 min after intervention. For each time‐point, spinal and muscle excitability were also tested. ROM increased in all groups, but none of the treatment groups had superior effects than the group with no treatment. This means that ROM testing maneuvers increased ROM amplitude, with no add‐on effect of the proposed neurodynamic techniques. Neurophysiological responses changed similarly in all groups, showing that the aftereffects were not intervention‐specific. We observed a significant negative association between the change in limb temperature and the change in latencies of all potentials. ROM‐testing procedures performed repeatedly increase ROM amplitude. This observation should be considered when evaluating the aftereffects of therapeutic interventions on ROM amplitude. None of the explored neurodynamic techniques produced acute aftereffects on hip ROM amplitude, spinal or muscle excitability different to the induced by the ROM testing maneuver.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10277214
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102772142023-06-20 Acute effects of a single neurodynamic mobilization session on range of motion and H‐reflex in asymptomatic young subjects: A controlled study Cancela, Álvaro Arias, Pablo Rodríguez‐Romero, Beatriz Chouza‐Insua, Marcelo Cudeiro, Javier Physiol Rep Original Articles Neurodynamic techniques have yielded good clinical results in the treatment of various pathologies. The objective of this study is to examine the short‐term effects of neurodynamic techniques of the sciatic nerve on hip ROM (range of motion) and on the amplitude and latency of the soleus H‐reflex and M‐waves, in young asymptomatic subjects. In a double‐blind controlled trial design, 60 young asymptomatic participants were randomly assigned into six groups with different levels of manipulation of the sciatic nerve. The passive straight leg raise test was used to evaluate the hip ROM amplitude. All evaluations were performed before, 1 min after, and 30 min after intervention. For each time‐point, spinal and muscle excitability were also tested. ROM increased in all groups, but none of the treatment groups had superior effects than the group with no treatment. This means that ROM testing maneuvers increased ROM amplitude, with no add‐on effect of the proposed neurodynamic techniques. Neurophysiological responses changed similarly in all groups, showing that the aftereffects were not intervention‐specific. We observed a significant negative association between the change in limb temperature and the change in latencies of all potentials. ROM‐testing procedures performed repeatedly increase ROM amplitude. This observation should be considered when evaluating the aftereffects of therapeutic interventions on ROM amplitude. None of the explored neurodynamic techniques produced acute aftereffects on hip ROM amplitude, spinal or muscle excitability different to the induced by the ROM testing maneuver. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10277214/ /pubmed/37332040 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15748 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Cancela, Álvaro
Arias, Pablo
Rodríguez‐Romero, Beatriz
Chouza‐Insua, Marcelo
Cudeiro, Javier
Acute effects of a single neurodynamic mobilization session on range of motion and H‐reflex in asymptomatic young subjects: A controlled study
title Acute effects of a single neurodynamic mobilization session on range of motion and H‐reflex in asymptomatic young subjects: A controlled study
title_full Acute effects of a single neurodynamic mobilization session on range of motion and H‐reflex in asymptomatic young subjects: A controlled study
title_fullStr Acute effects of a single neurodynamic mobilization session on range of motion and H‐reflex in asymptomatic young subjects: A controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Acute effects of a single neurodynamic mobilization session on range of motion and H‐reflex in asymptomatic young subjects: A controlled study
title_short Acute effects of a single neurodynamic mobilization session on range of motion and H‐reflex in asymptomatic young subjects: A controlled study
title_sort acute effects of a single neurodynamic mobilization session on range of motion and h‐reflex in asymptomatic young subjects: a controlled study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10277214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37332040
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15748
work_keys_str_mv AT cancelaalvaro acuteeffectsofasingleneurodynamicmobilizationsessiononrangeofmotionandhreflexinasymptomaticyoungsubjectsacontrolledstudy
AT ariaspablo acuteeffectsofasingleneurodynamicmobilizationsessiononrangeofmotionandhreflexinasymptomaticyoungsubjectsacontrolledstudy
AT rodriguezromerobeatriz acuteeffectsofasingleneurodynamicmobilizationsessiononrangeofmotionandhreflexinasymptomaticyoungsubjectsacontrolledstudy
AT chouzainsuamarcelo acuteeffectsofasingleneurodynamicmobilizationsessiononrangeofmotionandhreflexinasymptomaticyoungsubjectsacontrolledstudy
AT cudeirojavier acuteeffectsofasingleneurodynamicmobilizationsessiononrangeofmotionandhreflexinasymptomaticyoungsubjectsacontrolledstudy