Cargando…

Prognostic differences in grading and metastatic lymph node pattern in patients with small bowel neuroendocrine tumors

PURPOSE: Neuroendocrine tumors of the small intestine (si-NET) describe a heterogenous group of neoplasms. Based on the Ki67 proliferation index si-NET are divided into G1 (Ki67 < 2%), G2 (Ki67 3–20%) and rarely G3 (Ki67 > 20%) tumors. However, few studies evaluate the impact of tumor grading...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reinhard, Lisa, Mogl, Martina T., Benz, Fabian, Dukaczewska, Agata, Butz, Frederike, Dobrindt, Eva Maria, Tacke, Frank, Pratschke, Johann, Goretzki, Peter E., Jann, Henning
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10277262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37332044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-023-02956-8
_version_ 1785060241765826560
author Reinhard, Lisa
Mogl, Martina T.
Benz, Fabian
Dukaczewska, Agata
Butz, Frederike
Dobrindt, Eva Maria
Tacke, Frank
Pratschke, Johann
Goretzki, Peter E.
Jann, Henning
author_facet Reinhard, Lisa
Mogl, Martina T.
Benz, Fabian
Dukaczewska, Agata
Butz, Frederike
Dobrindt, Eva Maria
Tacke, Frank
Pratschke, Johann
Goretzki, Peter E.
Jann, Henning
author_sort Reinhard, Lisa
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Neuroendocrine tumors of the small intestine (si-NET) describe a heterogenous group of neoplasms. Based on the Ki67 proliferation index si-NET are divided into G1 (Ki67 < 2%), G2 (Ki67 3–20%) and rarely G3 (Ki67 > 20%) tumors. However, few studies evaluate the impact of tumor grading on prognosis in si-NET. Moreover, si-NET can form distinct lymphatic spread patterns to the mesenteric root, aortocaval lymph nodes, and distant organs. This study aims to identify prognostic factors within the lymphatic spread patterns and grading. METHODS: Demographic, pathological, and surgical data of 208 (90 male, 118 female) individuals with si-NETs treated at Charité University Medicine Berlin between 2010 and 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: A total of 113 (54.5%) specimens were defined as G1 and 93 (44.7%) as G2 tumors. Interestingly, splitting the G2 group in two subgroups: G2 low (Ki67 3–9%) and G2 high (Ki67 10–20%), displayed significant differences in overall survival (OS) (p = 0.008) and progression free survival (PFS) (p = 0.004) between these subgroups. Remission after surgery was less often achieved in patients with higher Ki67 index (> 10%). Lymph node metastases (N +) were present in 174 (83.6%) patients. Patients with isolated locoregional disease showed better PFS and OS in comparison to patients with additional aortocaval and distant lymph node metastases. CONCLUSION: Lymphatic spread pattern influences patient outcome. In G2 tumors, low and high grading shows heterogenous outcome in OS and PFS. Differentiation within this group might impact follow-up, adjuvant treatment, and surgical strategy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10277262
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102772622023-06-20 Prognostic differences in grading and metastatic lymph node pattern in patients with small bowel neuroendocrine tumors Reinhard, Lisa Mogl, Martina T. Benz, Fabian Dukaczewska, Agata Butz, Frederike Dobrindt, Eva Maria Tacke, Frank Pratschke, Johann Goretzki, Peter E. Jann, Henning Langenbecks Arch Surg Research PURPOSE: Neuroendocrine tumors of the small intestine (si-NET) describe a heterogenous group of neoplasms. Based on the Ki67 proliferation index si-NET are divided into G1 (Ki67 < 2%), G2 (Ki67 3–20%) and rarely G3 (Ki67 > 20%) tumors. However, few studies evaluate the impact of tumor grading on prognosis in si-NET. Moreover, si-NET can form distinct lymphatic spread patterns to the mesenteric root, aortocaval lymph nodes, and distant organs. This study aims to identify prognostic factors within the lymphatic spread patterns and grading. METHODS: Demographic, pathological, and surgical data of 208 (90 male, 118 female) individuals with si-NETs treated at Charité University Medicine Berlin between 2010 and 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: A total of 113 (54.5%) specimens were defined as G1 and 93 (44.7%) as G2 tumors. Interestingly, splitting the G2 group in two subgroups: G2 low (Ki67 3–9%) and G2 high (Ki67 10–20%), displayed significant differences in overall survival (OS) (p = 0.008) and progression free survival (PFS) (p = 0.004) between these subgroups. Remission after surgery was less often achieved in patients with higher Ki67 index (> 10%). Lymph node metastases (N +) were present in 174 (83.6%) patients. Patients with isolated locoregional disease showed better PFS and OS in comparison to patients with additional aortocaval and distant lymph node metastases. CONCLUSION: Lymphatic spread pattern influences patient outcome. In G2 tumors, low and high grading shows heterogenous outcome in OS and PFS. Differentiation within this group might impact follow-up, adjuvant treatment, and surgical strategy. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-06-19 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10277262/ /pubmed/37332044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-023-02956-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Reinhard, Lisa
Mogl, Martina T.
Benz, Fabian
Dukaczewska, Agata
Butz, Frederike
Dobrindt, Eva Maria
Tacke, Frank
Pratschke, Johann
Goretzki, Peter E.
Jann, Henning
Prognostic differences in grading and metastatic lymph node pattern in patients with small bowel neuroendocrine tumors
title Prognostic differences in grading and metastatic lymph node pattern in patients with small bowel neuroendocrine tumors
title_full Prognostic differences in grading and metastatic lymph node pattern in patients with small bowel neuroendocrine tumors
title_fullStr Prognostic differences in grading and metastatic lymph node pattern in patients with small bowel neuroendocrine tumors
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic differences in grading and metastatic lymph node pattern in patients with small bowel neuroendocrine tumors
title_short Prognostic differences in grading and metastatic lymph node pattern in patients with small bowel neuroendocrine tumors
title_sort prognostic differences in grading and metastatic lymph node pattern in patients with small bowel neuroendocrine tumors
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10277262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37332044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-023-02956-8
work_keys_str_mv AT reinhardlisa prognosticdifferencesingradingandmetastaticlymphnodepatterninpatientswithsmallbowelneuroendocrinetumors
AT moglmartinat prognosticdifferencesingradingandmetastaticlymphnodepatterninpatientswithsmallbowelneuroendocrinetumors
AT benzfabian prognosticdifferencesingradingandmetastaticlymphnodepatterninpatientswithsmallbowelneuroendocrinetumors
AT dukaczewskaagata prognosticdifferencesingradingandmetastaticlymphnodepatterninpatientswithsmallbowelneuroendocrinetumors
AT butzfrederike prognosticdifferencesingradingandmetastaticlymphnodepatterninpatientswithsmallbowelneuroendocrinetumors
AT dobrindtevamaria prognosticdifferencesingradingandmetastaticlymphnodepatterninpatientswithsmallbowelneuroendocrinetumors
AT tackefrank prognosticdifferencesingradingandmetastaticlymphnodepatterninpatientswithsmallbowelneuroendocrinetumors
AT pratschkejohann prognosticdifferencesingradingandmetastaticlymphnodepatterninpatientswithsmallbowelneuroendocrinetumors
AT goretzkipetere prognosticdifferencesingradingandmetastaticlymphnodepatterninpatientswithsmallbowelneuroendocrinetumors
AT jannhenning prognosticdifferencesingradingandmetastaticlymphnodepatterninpatientswithsmallbowelneuroendocrinetumors