Cargando…
Prognostic differences in grading and metastatic lymph node pattern in patients with small bowel neuroendocrine tumors
PURPOSE: Neuroendocrine tumors of the small intestine (si-NET) describe a heterogenous group of neoplasms. Based on the Ki67 proliferation index si-NET are divided into G1 (Ki67 < 2%), G2 (Ki67 3–20%) and rarely G3 (Ki67 > 20%) tumors. However, few studies evaluate the impact of tumor grading...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10277262/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37332044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-023-02956-8 |
_version_ | 1785060241765826560 |
---|---|
author | Reinhard, Lisa Mogl, Martina T. Benz, Fabian Dukaczewska, Agata Butz, Frederike Dobrindt, Eva Maria Tacke, Frank Pratschke, Johann Goretzki, Peter E. Jann, Henning |
author_facet | Reinhard, Lisa Mogl, Martina T. Benz, Fabian Dukaczewska, Agata Butz, Frederike Dobrindt, Eva Maria Tacke, Frank Pratschke, Johann Goretzki, Peter E. Jann, Henning |
author_sort | Reinhard, Lisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Neuroendocrine tumors of the small intestine (si-NET) describe a heterogenous group of neoplasms. Based on the Ki67 proliferation index si-NET are divided into G1 (Ki67 < 2%), G2 (Ki67 3–20%) and rarely G3 (Ki67 > 20%) tumors. However, few studies evaluate the impact of tumor grading on prognosis in si-NET. Moreover, si-NET can form distinct lymphatic spread patterns to the mesenteric root, aortocaval lymph nodes, and distant organs. This study aims to identify prognostic factors within the lymphatic spread patterns and grading. METHODS: Demographic, pathological, and surgical data of 208 (90 male, 118 female) individuals with si-NETs treated at Charité University Medicine Berlin between 2010 and 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: A total of 113 (54.5%) specimens were defined as G1 and 93 (44.7%) as G2 tumors. Interestingly, splitting the G2 group in two subgroups: G2 low (Ki67 3–9%) and G2 high (Ki67 10–20%), displayed significant differences in overall survival (OS) (p = 0.008) and progression free survival (PFS) (p = 0.004) between these subgroups. Remission after surgery was less often achieved in patients with higher Ki67 index (> 10%). Lymph node metastases (N +) were present in 174 (83.6%) patients. Patients with isolated locoregional disease showed better PFS and OS in comparison to patients with additional aortocaval and distant lymph node metastases. CONCLUSION: Lymphatic spread pattern influences patient outcome. In G2 tumors, low and high grading shows heterogenous outcome in OS and PFS. Differentiation within this group might impact follow-up, adjuvant treatment, and surgical strategy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10277262 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102772622023-06-20 Prognostic differences in grading and metastatic lymph node pattern in patients with small bowel neuroendocrine tumors Reinhard, Lisa Mogl, Martina T. Benz, Fabian Dukaczewska, Agata Butz, Frederike Dobrindt, Eva Maria Tacke, Frank Pratschke, Johann Goretzki, Peter E. Jann, Henning Langenbecks Arch Surg Research PURPOSE: Neuroendocrine tumors of the small intestine (si-NET) describe a heterogenous group of neoplasms. Based on the Ki67 proliferation index si-NET are divided into G1 (Ki67 < 2%), G2 (Ki67 3–20%) and rarely G3 (Ki67 > 20%) tumors. However, few studies evaluate the impact of tumor grading on prognosis in si-NET. Moreover, si-NET can form distinct lymphatic spread patterns to the mesenteric root, aortocaval lymph nodes, and distant organs. This study aims to identify prognostic factors within the lymphatic spread patterns and grading. METHODS: Demographic, pathological, and surgical data of 208 (90 male, 118 female) individuals with si-NETs treated at Charité University Medicine Berlin between 2010 and 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: A total of 113 (54.5%) specimens were defined as G1 and 93 (44.7%) as G2 tumors. Interestingly, splitting the G2 group in two subgroups: G2 low (Ki67 3–9%) and G2 high (Ki67 10–20%), displayed significant differences in overall survival (OS) (p = 0.008) and progression free survival (PFS) (p = 0.004) between these subgroups. Remission after surgery was less often achieved in patients with higher Ki67 index (> 10%). Lymph node metastases (N +) were present in 174 (83.6%) patients. Patients with isolated locoregional disease showed better PFS and OS in comparison to patients with additional aortocaval and distant lymph node metastases. CONCLUSION: Lymphatic spread pattern influences patient outcome. In G2 tumors, low and high grading shows heterogenous outcome in OS and PFS. Differentiation within this group might impact follow-up, adjuvant treatment, and surgical strategy. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-06-19 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10277262/ /pubmed/37332044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-023-02956-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Reinhard, Lisa Mogl, Martina T. Benz, Fabian Dukaczewska, Agata Butz, Frederike Dobrindt, Eva Maria Tacke, Frank Pratschke, Johann Goretzki, Peter E. Jann, Henning Prognostic differences in grading and metastatic lymph node pattern in patients with small bowel neuroendocrine tumors |
title | Prognostic differences in grading and metastatic lymph node pattern in patients with small bowel neuroendocrine tumors |
title_full | Prognostic differences in grading and metastatic lymph node pattern in patients with small bowel neuroendocrine tumors |
title_fullStr | Prognostic differences in grading and metastatic lymph node pattern in patients with small bowel neuroendocrine tumors |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic differences in grading and metastatic lymph node pattern in patients with small bowel neuroendocrine tumors |
title_short | Prognostic differences in grading and metastatic lymph node pattern in patients with small bowel neuroendocrine tumors |
title_sort | prognostic differences in grading and metastatic lymph node pattern in patients with small bowel neuroendocrine tumors |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10277262/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37332044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-023-02956-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reinhardlisa prognosticdifferencesingradingandmetastaticlymphnodepatterninpatientswithsmallbowelneuroendocrinetumors AT moglmartinat prognosticdifferencesingradingandmetastaticlymphnodepatterninpatientswithsmallbowelneuroendocrinetumors AT benzfabian prognosticdifferencesingradingandmetastaticlymphnodepatterninpatientswithsmallbowelneuroendocrinetumors AT dukaczewskaagata prognosticdifferencesingradingandmetastaticlymphnodepatterninpatientswithsmallbowelneuroendocrinetumors AT butzfrederike prognosticdifferencesingradingandmetastaticlymphnodepatterninpatientswithsmallbowelneuroendocrinetumors AT dobrindtevamaria prognosticdifferencesingradingandmetastaticlymphnodepatterninpatientswithsmallbowelneuroendocrinetumors AT tackefrank prognosticdifferencesingradingandmetastaticlymphnodepatterninpatientswithsmallbowelneuroendocrinetumors AT pratschkejohann prognosticdifferencesingradingandmetastaticlymphnodepatterninpatientswithsmallbowelneuroendocrinetumors AT goretzkipetere prognosticdifferencesingradingandmetastaticlymphnodepatterninpatientswithsmallbowelneuroendocrinetumors AT jannhenning prognosticdifferencesingradingandmetastaticlymphnodepatterninpatientswithsmallbowelneuroendocrinetumors |