Cargando…

Evaluation of firearm injuries by trauma scoring systems in a secondary health care institution

BACKGROUND: Scoring systems are widely used in trauma patients and are very important in the care of trauma patients. The objective of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of scoring systems in evaluating the patients who were brought to a hospital without a trauma center due to firearm i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nusretoğlu, Resul, Dönder, Yunus, Biri, İsmail, Gültekin, Yücel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kare Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10277365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36169465
http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2021.58456
_version_ 1785060262812844032
author Nusretoğlu, Resul
Dönder, Yunus
Biri, İsmail
Gültekin, Yücel
author_facet Nusretoğlu, Resul
Dönder, Yunus
Biri, İsmail
Gültekin, Yücel
author_sort Nusretoğlu, Resul
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Scoring systems are widely used in trauma patients and are very important in the care of trauma patients. The objective of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of scoring systems in evaluating the patients who were brought to a hospital without a trauma center due to firearm injuries (FIs) using scoring systems, and the efficacy of these systems in identifying patients who should be treated in a trauma center. METHODS: Patients brought to Hakkari Yüksekova State Hospital due to FIs between January 2010 and December 2019 were retrospectively investigated. Patients aged 16 and over were included in the study. Patients who were brought to the hospital while deceased and those who did not respond to cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the hospital were excluded from the study. In addition, patients who underwent simple outpatient medical intervention were not included in the patient group. Patients were evaluated demographically. The mortality predictions of trauma scoring systems, which are widely used in the evaluation of trauma patients, were examined. In addition, the effectiveness of scoring systems in identifying patients who should be treated in trauma centers was investigated. RESULTS: In the study, 331 patients, 96.9% of whom were male, were evaluated. The patient group consisted of young patients and the median age was 27 (IQR, 24–29) years. A total of 74 (22.4%) patients were referred to trauma referral hospitals for diagnosis and treatment. Mortality occurred in 46 (13.9%) patients. Glasgow coma scale, injury severity score (ISS), revised trauma score, new trauma score, and trauma revised ISS were found effective for predicting mortality in patients, and scoring systems were correlated with each other. However, scoring systems were not found effective in distinguishing patients who should be treated in a trauma center. CONCLUSION: Scoring systems are significant in predicting mortality of patients with gunshot wounds. However, trauma scoring systems have not been found to be effective in distinguishing patients who require referral to a trauma center.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10277365
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Kare Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102773652023-06-20 Evaluation of firearm injuries by trauma scoring systems in a secondary health care institution Nusretoğlu, Resul Dönder, Yunus Biri, İsmail Gültekin, Yücel Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg Original Article BACKGROUND: Scoring systems are widely used in trauma patients and are very important in the care of trauma patients. The objective of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of scoring systems in evaluating the patients who were brought to a hospital without a trauma center due to firearm injuries (FIs) using scoring systems, and the efficacy of these systems in identifying patients who should be treated in a trauma center. METHODS: Patients brought to Hakkari Yüksekova State Hospital due to FIs between January 2010 and December 2019 were retrospectively investigated. Patients aged 16 and over were included in the study. Patients who were brought to the hospital while deceased and those who did not respond to cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the hospital were excluded from the study. In addition, patients who underwent simple outpatient medical intervention were not included in the patient group. Patients were evaluated demographically. The mortality predictions of trauma scoring systems, which are widely used in the evaluation of trauma patients, were examined. In addition, the effectiveness of scoring systems in identifying patients who should be treated in trauma centers was investigated. RESULTS: In the study, 331 patients, 96.9% of whom were male, were evaluated. The patient group consisted of young patients and the median age was 27 (IQR, 24–29) years. A total of 74 (22.4%) patients were referred to trauma referral hospitals for diagnosis and treatment. Mortality occurred in 46 (13.9%) patients. Glasgow coma scale, injury severity score (ISS), revised trauma score, new trauma score, and trauma revised ISS were found effective for predicting mortality in patients, and scoring systems were correlated with each other. However, scoring systems were not found effective in distinguishing patients who should be treated in a trauma center. CONCLUSION: Scoring systems are significant in predicting mortality of patients with gunshot wounds. However, trauma scoring systems have not been found to be effective in distinguishing patients who require referral to a trauma center. Kare Publishing 2022-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10277365/ /pubmed/36169465 http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2021.58456 Text en Copyright © 2022 Turkish Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Original Article
Nusretoğlu, Resul
Dönder, Yunus
Biri, İsmail
Gültekin, Yücel
Evaluation of firearm injuries by trauma scoring systems in a secondary health care institution
title Evaluation of firearm injuries by trauma scoring systems in a secondary health care institution
title_full Evaluation of firearm injuries by trauma scoring systems in a secondary health care institution
title_fullStr Evaluation of firearm injuries by trauma scoring systems in a secondary health care institution
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of firearm injuries by trauma scoring systems in a secondary health care institution
title_short Evaluation of firearm injuries by trauma scoring systems in a secondary health care institution
title_sort evaluation of firearm injuries by trauma scoring systems in a secondary health care institution
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10277365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36169465
http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2021.58456
work_keys_str_mv AT nusretogluresul evaluationoffirearminjuriesbytraumascoringsystemsinasecondaryhealthcareinstitution
AT donderyunus evaluationoffirearminjuriesbytraumascoringsystemsinasecondaryhealthcareinstitution
AT biriismail evaluationoffirearminjuriesbytraumascoringsystemsinasecondaryhealthcareinstitution
AT gultekinyucel evaluationoffirearminjuriesbytraumascoringsystemsinasecondaryhealthcareinstitution