Cargando…

Predictors and clinical implications of residual mitral regurgitation following left ventricular assist device therapy

BACKGROUND: Correction of mitral regurgitation (MR) at the time of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation remains controversial. There is conflicting evidence regarding the clinical impact of residual MR, and studies have not examined whether MR aetiology or right heart function impacts...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharma, Harish, Liu, Boyang, Yuan, Mengshi, Shakeel, Iqra, Morley-Smith, Andrew, Hatch, Alice, Bradley, Joseph, Chue, Colin, Myerson, Saul G, Steeds, Richard Paul, Lim, Sern
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10277521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37316326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2022-002240
_version_ 1785060300529074176
author Sharma, Harish
Liu, Boyang
Yuan, Mengshi
Shakeel, Iqra
Morley-Smith, Andrew
Hatch, Alice
Bradley, Joseph
Chue, Colin
Myerson, Saul G
Steeds, Richard Paul
Lim, Sern
author_facet Sharma, Harish
Liu, Boyang
Yuan, Mengshi
Shakeel, Iqra
Morley-Smith, Andrew
Hatch, Alice
Bradley, Joseph
Chue, Colin
Myerson, Saul G
Steeds, Richard Paul
Lim, Sern
author_sort Sharma, Harish
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Correction of mitral regurgitation (MR) at the time of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation remains controversial. There is conflicting evidence regarding the clinical impact of residual MR, and studies have not examined whether MR aetiology or right heart function impacts the likelihood of residual MR. METHODS: This is a retrospective single-centre study of 155 consecutive patients with LVAD implantation from January 2011 to March 2020. Exclusion criteria were no MR pre-LVAD (n=8), inaccessible echocardiography (n=9), duplicate records (n=10) and concomitant mitral valve repair (n=1). Statistical analysis was performed using STATA V.16 and SPSS V.24. RESULTS: Carpentier IIIb MR aetiology was associated with more severe MR pre-LVAD (severe 18/27 (67%) vs non-severe 32/91 (35%), p=0.004) and a higher likelihood of residual MR (8/11 (72%) vs 30/74 (41%), p=0.045). Of 95 patients with significant MR pre-LVAD, 15 (16%) had persistent significant MR, which was associated with higher mortality (p=0.006), post-LVAD right ventricle (RV) dilatation (10/15 (67%) vs 28/80 (35%), p=0.022) and RV dysfunction (14/15 (93%) vs 35/80 (44%), p<0.001). Aside from ischaemic aetiology, other pre-LVAD parameters that were associated with significant residual MR included left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD) (6.9 cm (5.7–7.2) vs 5.9 cm (5.5–6.5), p=0.043), left atrial volume index (LAVi) (78 mL/m(2) (56–88) vs 57 mL/m(2) (47–77), p=0.021), posterior leaflet displacement (2.5 cm (2.3–2.9) vs 2.3 cm (1.9–2.7), p=0.042) and basal right ventricular end-diastolic diameter (RVEDD) (5.1±0.8 cm vs 4.5±0.8 cm, p=0.010). CONCLUSION: LVAD therapy improves MR and tricuspid regurgitation severity in the majority, but 14% have persistent significant residual MR, associated with right ventricular dysfunction and higher long-term mortality. This may be predicted pre-LVAD by greater LVESD, RVEDD and LAVi and by ischaemic aetiology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10277521
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102775212023-06-20 Predictors and clinical implications of residual mitral regurgitation following left ventricular assist device therapy Sharma, Harish Liu, Boyang Yuan, Mengshi Shakeel, Iqra Morley-Smith, Andrew Hatch, Alice Bradley, Joseph Chue, Colin Myerson, Saul G Steeds, Richard Paul Lim, Sern Open Heart Valvular Heart Disease BACKGROUND: Correction of mitral regurgitation (MR) at the time of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation remains controversial. There is conflicting evidence regarding the clinical impact of residual MR, and studies have not examined whether MR aetiology or right heart function impacts the likelihood of residual MR. METHODS: This is a retrospective single-centre study of 155 consecutive patients with LVAD implantation from January 2011 to March 2020. Exclusion criteria were no MR pre-LVAD (n=8), inaccessible echocardiography (n=9), duplicate records (n=10) and concomitant mitral valve repair (n=1). Statistical analysis was performed using STATA V.16 and SPSS V.24. RESULTS: Carpentier IIIb MR aetiology was associated with more severe MR pre-LVAD (severe 18/27 (67%) vs non-severe 32/91 (35%), p=0.004) and a higher likelihood of residual MR (8/11 (72%) vs 30/74 (41%), p=0.045). Of 95 patients with significant MR pre-LVAD, 15 (16%) had persistent significant MR, which was associated with higher mortality (p=0.006), post-LVAD right ventricle (RV) dilatation (10/15 (67%) vs 28/80 (35%), p=0.022) and RV dysfunction (14/15 (93%) vs 35/80 (44%), p<0.001). Aside from ischaemic aetiology, other pre-LVAD parameters that were associated with significant residual MR included left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD) (6.9 cm (5.7–7.2) vs 5.9 cm (5.5–6.5), p=0.043), left atrial volume index (LAVi) (78 mL/m(2) (56–88) vs 57 mL/m(2) (47–77), p=0.021), posterior leaflet displacement (2.5 cm (2.3–2.9) vs 2.3 cm (1.9–2.7), p=0.042) and basal right ventricular end-diastolic diameter (RVEDD) (5.1±0.8 cm vs 4.5±0.8 cm, p=0.010). CONCLUSION: LVAD therapy improves MR and tricuspid regurgitation severity in the majority, but 14% have persistent significant residual MR, associated with right ventricular dysfunction and higher long-term mortality. This may be predicted pre-LVAD by greater LVESD, RVEDD and LAVi and by ischaemic aetiology. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10277521/ /pubmed/37316326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2022-002240 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Valvular Heart Disease
Sharma, Harish
Liu, Boyang
Yuan, Mengshi
Shakeel, Iqra
Morley-Smith, Andrew
Hatch, Alice
Bradley, Joseph
Chue, Colin
Myerson, Saul G
Steeds, Richard Paul
Lim, Sern
Predictors and clinical implications of residual mitral regurgitation following left ventricular assist device therapy
title Predictors and clinical implications of residual mitral regurgitation following left ventricular assist device therapy
title_full Predictors and clinical implications of residual mitral regurgitation following left ventricular assist device therapy
title_fullStr Predictors and clinical implications of residual mitral regurgitation following left ventricular assist device therapy
title_full_unstemmed Predictors and clinical implications of residual mitral regurgitation following left ventricular assist device therapy
title_short Predictors and clinical implications of residual mitral regurgitation following left ventricular assist device therapy
title_sort predictors and clinical implications of residual mitral regurgitation following left ventricular assist device therapy
topic Valvular Heart Disease
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10277521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37316326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2022-002240
work_keys_str_mv AT sharmaharish predictorsandclinicalimplicationsofresidualmitralregurgitationfollowingleftventricularassistdevicetherapy
AT liuboyang predictorsandclinicalimplicationsofresidualmitralregurgitationfollowingleftventricularassistdevicetherapy
AT yuanmengshi predictorsandclinicalimplicationsofresidualmitralregurgitationfollowingleftventricularassistdevicetherapy
AT shakeeliqra predictorsandclinicalimplicationsofresidualmitralregurgitationfollowingleftventricularassistdevicetherapy
AT morleysmithandrew predictorsandclinicalimplicationsofresidualmitralregurgitationfollowingleftventricularassistdevicetherapy
AT hatchalice predictorsandclinicalimplicationsofresidualmitralregurgitationfollowingleftventricularassistdevicetherapy
AT bradleyjoseph predictorsandclinicalimplicationsofresidualmitralregurgitationfollowingleftventricularassistdevicetherapy
AT chuecolin predictorsandclinicalimplicationsofresidualmitralregurgitationfollowingleftventricularassistdevicetherapy
AT myersonsaulg predictorsandclinicalimplicationsofresidualmitralregurgitationfollowingleftventricularassistdevicetherapy
AT steedsrichardpaul predictorsandclinicalimplicationsofresidualmitralregurgitationfollowingleftventricularassistdevicetherapy
AT limsern predictorsandclinicalimplicationsofresidualmitralregurgitationfollowingleftventricularassistdevicetherapy