Cargando…
Predictors and clinical implications of residual mitral regurgitation following left ventricular assist device therapy
BACKGROUND: Correction of mitral regurgitation (MR) at the time of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation remains controversial. There is conflicting evidence regarding the clinical impact of residual MR, and studies have not examined whether MR aetiology or right heart function impacts...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10277521/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37316326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2022-002240 |
_version_ | 1785060300529074176 |
---|---|
author | Sharma, Harish Liu, Boyang Yuan, Mengshi Shakeel, Iqra Morley-Smith, Andrew Hatch, Alice Bradley, Joseph Chue, Colin Myerson, Saul G Steeds, Richard Paul Lim, Sern |
author_facet | Sharma, Harish Liu, Boyang Yuan, Mengshi Shakeel, Iqra Morley-Smith, Andrew Hatch, Alice Bradley, Joseph Chue, Colin Myerson, Saul G Steeds, Richard Paul Lim, Sern |
author_sort | Sharma, Harish |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Correction of mitral regurgitation (MR) at the time of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation remains controversial. There is conflicting evidence regarding the clinical impact of residual MR, and studies have not examined whether MR aetiology or right heart function impacts the likelihood of residual MR. METHODS: This is a retrospective single-centre study of 155 consecutive patients with LVAD implantation from January 2011 to March 2020. Exclusion criteria were no MR pre-LVAD (n=8), inaccessible echocardiography (n=9), duplicate records (n=10) and concomitant mitral valve repair (n=1). Statistical analysis was performed using STATA V.16 and SPSS V.24. RESULTS: Carpentier IIIb MR aetiology was associated with more severe MR pre-LVAD (severe 18/27 (67%) vs non-severe 32/91 (35%), p=0.004) and a higher likelihood of residual MR (8/11 (72%) vs 30/74 (41%), p=0.045). Of 95 patients with significant MR pre-LVAD, 15 (16%) had persistent significant MR, which was associated with higher mortality (p=0.006), post-LVAD right ventricle (RV) dilatation (10/15 (67%) vs 28/80 (35%), p=0.022) and RV dysfunction (14/15 (93%) vs 35/80 (44%), p<0.001). Aside from ischaemic aetiology, other pre-LVAD parameters that were associated with significant residual MR included left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD) (6.9 cm (5.7–7.2) vs 5.9 cm (5.5–6.5), p=0.043), left atrial volume index (LAVi) (78 mL/m(2) (56–88) vs 57 mL/m(2) (47–77), p=0.021), posterior leaflet displacement (2.5 cm (2.3–2.9) vs 2.3 cm (1.9–2.7), p=0.042) and basal right ventricular end-diastolic diameter (RVEDD) (5.1±0.8 cm vs 4.5±0.8 cm, p=0.010). CONCLUSION: LVAD therapy improves MR and tricuspid regurgitation severity in the majority, but 14% have persistent significant residual MR, associated with right ventricular dysfunction and higher long-term mortality. This may be predicted pre-LVAD by greater LVESD, RVEDD and LAVi and by ischaemic aetiology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10277521 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102775212023-06-20 Predictors and clinical implications of residual mitral regurgitation following left ventricular assist device therapy Sharma, Harish Liu, Boyang Yuan, Mengshi Shakeel, Iqra Morley-Smith, Andrew Hatch, Alice Bradley, Joseph Chue, Colin Myerson, Saul G Steeds, Richard Paul Lim, Sern Open Heart Valvular Heart Disease BACKGROUND: Correction of mitral regurgitation (MR) at the time of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation remains controversial. There is conflicting evidence regarding the clinical impact of residual MR, and studies have not examined whether MR aetiology or right heart function impacts the likelihood of residual MR. METHODS: This is a retrospective single-centre study of 155 consecutive patients with LVAD implantation from January 2011 to March 2020. Exclusion criteria were no MR pre-LVAD (n=8), inaccessible echocardiography (n=9), duplicate records (n=10) and concomitant mitral valve repair (n=1). Statistical analysis was performed using STATA V.16 and SPSS V.24. RESULTS: Carpentier IIIb MR aetiology was associated with more severe MR pre-LVAD (severe 18/27 (67%) vs non-severe 32/91 (35%), p=0.004) and a higher likelihood of residual MR (8/11 (72%) vs 30/74 (41%), p=0.045). Of 95 patients with significant MR pre-LVAD, 15 (16%) had persistent significant MR, which was associated with higher mortality (p=0.006), post-LVAD right ventricle (RV) dilatation (10/15 (67%) vs 28/80 (35%), p=0.022) and RV dysfunction (14/15 (93%) vs 35/80 (44%), p<0.001). Aside from ischaemic aetiology, other pre-LVAD parameters that were associated with significant residual MR included left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD) (6.9 cm (5.7–7.2) vs 5.9 cm (5.5–6.5), p=0.043), left atrial volume index (LAVi) (78 mL/m(2) (56–88) vs 57 mL/m(2) (47–77), p=0.021), posterior leaflet displacement (2.5 cm (2.3–2.9) vs 2.3 cm (1.9–2.7), p=0.042) and basal right ventricular end-diastolic diameter (RVEDD) (5.1±0.8 cm vs 4.5±0.8 cm, p=0.010). CONCLUSION: LVAD therapy improves MR and tricuspid regurgitation severity in the majority, but 14% have persistent significant residual MR, associated with right ventricular dysfunction and higher long-term mortality. This may be predicted pre-LVAD by greater LVESD, RVEDD and LAVi and by ischaemic aetiology. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10277521/ /pubmed/37316326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2022-002240 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Valvular Heart Disease Sharma, Harish Liu, Boyang Yuan, Mengshi Shakeel, Iqra Morley-Smith, Andrew Hatch, Alice Bradley, Joseph Chue, Colin Myerson, Saul G Steeds, Richard Paul Lim, Sern Predictors and clinical implications of residual mitral regurgitation following left ventricular assist device therapy |
title | Predictors and clinical implications of residual mitral regurgitation following left ventricular assist device therapy |
title_full | Predictors and clinical implications of residual mitral regurgitation following left ventricular assist device therapy |
title_fullStr | Predictors and clinical implications of residual mitral regurgitation following left ventricular assist device therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Predictors and clinical implications of residual mitral regurgitation following left ventricular assist device therapy |
title_short | Predictors and clinical implications of residual mitral regurgitation following left ventricular assist device therapy |
title_sort | predictors and clinical implications of residual mitral regurgitation following left ventricular assist device therapy |
topic | Valvular Heart Disease |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10277521/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37316326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2022-002240 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sharmaharish predictorsandclinicalimplicationsofresidualmitralregurgitationfollowingleftventricularassistdevicetherapy AT liuboyang predictorsandclinicalimplicationsofresidualmitralregurgitationfollowingleftventricularassistdevicetherapy AT yuanmengshi predictorsandclinicalimplicationsofresidualmitralregurgitationfollowingleftventricularassistdevicetherapy AT shakeeliqra predictorsandclinicalimplicationsofresidualmitralregurgitationfollowingleftventricularassistdevicetherapy AT morleysmithandrew predictorsandclinicalimplicationsofresidualmitralregurgitationfollowingleftventricularassistdevicetherapy AT hatchalice predictorsandclinicalimplicationsofresidualmitralregurgitationfollowingleftventricularassistdevicetherapy AT bradleyjoseph predictorsandclinicalimplicationsofresidualmitralregurgitationfollowingleftventricularassistdevicetherapy AT chuecolin predictorsandclinicalimplicationsofresidualmitralregurgitationfollowingleftventricularassistdevicetherapy AT myersonsaulg predictorsandclinicalimplicationsofresidualmitralregurgitationfollowingleftventricularassistdevicetherapy AT steedsrichardpaul predictorsandclinicalimplicationsofresidualmitralregurgitationfollowingleftventricularassistdevicetherapy AT limsern predictorsandclinicalimplicationsofresidualmitralregurgitationfollowingleftventricularassistdevicetherapy |