Cargando…

Intravenous versus subcutaneous tocilizumab in Takayasu arteritis: multicentre retrospective study

OBJECTIVES: In this large multicentre study, we compared the effectiveness and safety of tocilizumab intravenous versus subcutaneous (SC) in 109 Takayasu arteritis (TAK) patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicentre study in referral centres from France, Italy, Spain, Armenia, Israel,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mekinian, Arsène, Biard, Lucie, Lorenzo, Dagna, Novikov, Pavel I, Salvarani, Carlo, Espitia, Olivier, Sciascia, Savino, Michaud, Martin, Lambert, Marc, Hernández-Rodríguez, José, Schleinitz, Nicolas, Awisat, Abid, Puechal, Xavier, Aouba, Achille, Munoz Pons, Helene, Smitienko, Ilya, Gaultier, Jean Baptiste, Edwige, Le Mouel, Benhamou, Ygal, Perlat, Antoinette, Jego, Patrick, Goulenok, Tiphaine, Sacre, Karim, Lioger, Bertrand, Hassold, Nolan, Broner, Jonathan, Dufrost, Virginie, Sené, Thomas, Seguier, Julie, Maurier, Francois, Berthier, Sabine, Belot, Alexandre, Frikha, Faten, Denis, Guillaume, Audemard-Verger, Alexandra, Koné-Paut, Isabelle, Humbert, Sebastien, Woaye-Hune, Pascal, Tomelleri, Alessandro, Baldissera, Elena Marina, Kuwana, Masataka, Lo Gullo, Alberto, Mukuchyan, Vahan, Dellal, Azeddine, Gaches, Francis, Zeminsky, Pierre, Galli, Elena, Alvarado, Moya, Boiardi, Luigi, Francesco, Muratore, Vautier, Mathieu, Campochiaro, Corrado, Moiseev, Sergey, Vieira, Matheus, Cacoub, Patrice, Fain, Olivier, Saadoun, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10277523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37321669
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002830
_version_ 1785060300993593344
author Mekinian, Arsène
Biard, Lucie
Lorenzo, Dagna
Novikov, Pavel I
Salvarani, Carlo
Espitia, Olivier
Sciascia, Savino
Michaud, Martin
Lambert, Marc
Hernández-Rodríguez, José
Schleinitz, Nicolas
Awisat, Abid
Puechal, Xavier
Aouba, Achille
Munoz Pons, Helene
Smitienko, Ilya
Gaultier, Jean Baptiste
Edwige, Le Mouel
Benhamou, Ygal
Perlat, Antoinette
Jego, Patrick
Goulenok, Tiphaine
Sacre, Karim
Lioger, Bertrand
Hassold, Nolan
Broner, Jonathan
Dufrost, Virginie
Sené, Thomas
Seguier, Julie
Maurier, Francois
Berthier, Sabine
Belot, Alexandre
Frikha, Faten
Denis, Guillaume
Audemard-Verger, Alexandra
Koné-Paut, Isabelle
Humbert, Sebastien
Woaye-Hune, Pascal
Tomelleri, Alessandro
Baldissera, Elena Marina
Kuwana, Masataka
Lo Gullo, Alberto
Mukuchyan, Vahan
Dellal, Azeddine
Gaches, Francis
Zeminsky, Pierre
Galli, Elena
Alvarado, Moya
Boiardi, Luigi
Francesco, Muratore
Vautier, Mathieu
Campochiaro, Corrado
Moiseev, Sergey
Vieira, Matheus
Cacoub, Patrice
Fain, Olivier
Saadoun, David
author_facet Mekinian, Arsène
Biard, Lucie
Lorenzo, Dagna
Novikov, Pavel I
Salvarani, Carlo
Espitia, Olivier
Sciascia, Savino
Michaud, Martin
Lambert, Marc
Hernández-Rodríguez, José
Schleinitz, Nicolas
Awisat, Abid
Puechal, Xavier
Aouba, Achille
Munoz Pons, Helene
Smitienko, Ilya
Gaultier, Jean Baptiste
Edwige, Le Mouel
Benhamou, Ygal
Perlat, Antoinette
Jego, Patrick
Goulenok, Tiphaine
Sacre, Karim
Lioger, Bertrand
Hassold, Nolan
Broner, Jonathan
Dufrost, Virginie
Sené, Thomas
Seguier, Julie
Maurier, Francois
Berthier, Sabine
Belot, Alexandre
Frikha, Faten
Denis, Guillaume
Audemard-Verger, Alexandra
Koné-Paut, Isabelle
Humbert, Sebastien
Woaye-Hune, Pascal
Tomelleri, Alessandro
Baldissera, Elena Marina
Kuwana, Masataka
Lo Gullo, Alberto
Mukuchyan, Vahan
Dellal, Azeddine
Gaches, Francis
Zeminsky, Pierre
Galli, Elena
Alvarado, Moya
Boiardi, Luigi
Francesco, Muratore
Vautier, Mathieu
Campochiaro, Corrado
Moiseev, Sergey
Vieira, Matheus
Cacoub, Patrice
Fain, Olivier
Saadoun, David
author_sort Mekinian, Arsène
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: In this large multicentre study, we compared the effectiveness and safety of tocilizumab intravenous versus subcutaneous (SC) in 109 Takayasu arteritis (TAK) patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicentre study in referral centres from France, Italy, Spain, Armenia, Israel, Japan, Tunisia and Russia regarding biological-targeted therapies in TAK, since January 2017 to September 2019. RESULTS: A total of 109 TAK patients received at least 3 months tocilizumab therapy and were included in this study. Among them, 91 and 18 patients received intravenous and SC tocilizumab, respectively. A complete response (NIH <2 with less than 7.5 mg/day of prednisone) at 6 months was evidenced in 69% of TAK patients, of whom 57 (70%) and 11 (69%) patients were on intravenous and SC tocilizumab, respectively (p=0.95). The factors associated with complete response to tocilizumab at 6 months in multivariate analysis, only age <30 years (OR 2.85, 95% CI 1.14 to 7.12; p=0.027) and time between TAK diagnosis and tocilizumab initiation (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.36; p=0.034). During the median follow-up of 30.1 months (0.4; 105.8) and 10.8 (0.1; 46.4) (p<0.0001) in patients who received tocilizumab in intravenous and SC forms, respectively, the risk of relapse was significantly higher in TAK patients on SC tocilizumab (HR=2.55, 95% CI 1.08 to 6.02; p=0.033). The overall cumulative incidence of relapse at 12 months in TAK patients was at 13.7% (95% CI 7.6% to 21.5%), with 10.3% (95% CI 4.8% to 18.4%) for those on intravenous tocilizumab vs 30.9% (95% CI 10.5% to 54.2%) for patients receiving SC tocilizumab. Adverse events occurred in 14 (15%) patients on intravenous route and in 2 (11%) on SC tocilizumab. CONCLUSION: In this study, we confirm that tocilizumab is effective in TAK, with complete remission being achieving by 70% of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs-refractory TAK patients at 6 months.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10277523
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102775232023-06-20 Intravenous versus subcutaneous tocilizumab in Takayasu arteritis: multicentre retrospective study Mekinian, Arsène Biard, Lucie Lorenzo, Dagna Novikov, Pavel I Salvarani, Carlo Espitia, Olivier Sciascia, Savino Michaud, Martin Lambert, Marc Hernández-Rodríguez, José Schleinitz, Nicolas Awisat, Abid Puechal, Xavier Aouba, Achille Munoz Pons, Helene Smitienko, Ilya Gaultier, Jean Baptiste Edwige, Le Mouel Benhamou, Ygal Perlat, Antoinette Jego, Patrick Goulenok, Tiphaine Sacre, Karim Lioger, Bertrand Hassold, Nolan Broner, Jonathan Dufrost, Virginie Sené, Thomas Seguier, Julie Maurier, Francois Berthier, Sabine Belot, Alexandre Frikha, Faten Denis, Guillaume Audemard-Verger, Alexandra Koné-Paut, Isabelle Humbert, Sebastien Woaye-Hune, Pascal Tomelleri, Alessandro Baldissera, Elena Marina Kuwana, Masataka Lo Gullo, Alberto Mukuchyan, Vahan Dellal, Azeddine Gaches, Francis Zeminsky, Pierre Galli, Elena Alvarado, Moya Boiardi, Luigi Francesco, Muratore Vautier, Mathieu Campochiaro, Corrado Moiseev, Sergey Vieira, Matheus Cacoub, Patrice Fain, Olivier Saadoun, David RMD Open Vasculitis OBJECTIVES: In this large multicentre study, we compared the effectiveness and safety of tocilizumab intravenous versus subcutaneous (SC) in 109 Takayasu arteritis (TAK) patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicentre study in referral centres from France, Italy, Spain, Armenia, Israel, Japan, Tunisia and Russia regarding biological-targeted therapies in TAK, since January 2017 to September 2019. RESULTS: A total of 109 TAK patients received at least 3 months tocilizumab therapy and were included in this study. Among them, 91 and 18 patients received intravenous and SC tocilizumab, respectively. A complete response (NIH <2 with less than 7.5 mg/day of prednisone) at 6 months was evidenced in 69% of TAK patients, of whom 57 (70%) and 11 (69%) patients were on intravenous and SC tocilizumab, respectively (p=0.95). The factors associated with complete response to tocilizumab at 6 months in multivariate analysis, only age <30 years (OR 2.85, 95% CI 1.14 to 7.12; p=0.027) and time between TAK diagnosis and tocilizumab initiation (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.36; p=0.034). During the median follow-up of 30.1 months (0.4; 105.8) and 10.8 (0.1; 46.4) (p<0.0001) in patients who received tocilizumab in intravenous and SC forms, respectively, the risk of relapse was significantly higher in TAK patients on SC tocilizumab (HR=2.55, 95% CI 1.08 to 6.02; p=0.033). The overall cumulative incidence of relapse at 12 months in TAK patients was at 13.7% (95% CI 7.6% to 21.5%), with 10.3% (95% CI 4.8% to 18.4%) for those on intravenous tocilizumab vs 30.9% (95% CI 10.5% to 54.2%) for patients receiving SC tocilizumab. Adverse events occurred in 14 (15%) patients on intravenous route and in 2 (11%) on SC tocilizumab. CONCLUSION: In this study, we confirm that tocilizumab is effective in TAK, with complete remission being achieving by 70% of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs-refractory TAK patients at 6 months. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10277523/ /pubmed/37321669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002830 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Vasculitis
Mekinian, Arsène
Biard, Lucie
Lorenzo, Dagna
Novikov, Pavel I
Salvarani, Carlo
Espitia, Olivier
Sciascia, Savino
Michaud, Martin
Lambert, Marc
Hernández-Rodríguez, José
Schleinitz, Nicolas
Awisat, Abid
Puechal, Xavier
Aouba, Achille
Munoz Pons, Helene
Smitienko, Ilya
Gaultier, Jean Baptiste
Edwige, Le Mouel
Benhamou, Ygal
Perlat, Antoinette
Jego, Patrick
Goulenok, Tiphaine
Sacre, Karim
Lioger, Bertrand
Hassold, Nolan
Broner, Jonathan
Dufrost, Virginie
Sené, Thomas
Seguier, Julie
Maurier, Francois
Berthier, Sabine
Belot, Alexandre
Frikha, Faten
Denis, Guillaume
Audemard-Verger, Alexandra
Koné-Paut, Isabelle
Humbert, Sebastien
Woaye-Hune, Pascal
Tomelleri, Alessandro
Baldissera, Elena Marina
Kuwana, Masataka
Lo Gullo, Alberto
Mukuchyan, Vahan
Dellal, Azeddine
Gaches, Francis
Zeminsky, Pierre
Galli, Elena
Alvarado, Moya
Boiardi, Luigi
Francesco, Muratore
Vautier, Mathieu
Campochiaro, Corrado
Moiseev, Sergey
Vieira, Matheus
Cacoub, Patrice
Fain, Olivier
Saadoun, David
Intravenous versus subcutaneous tocilizumab in Takayasu arteritis: multicentre retrospective study
title Intravenous versus subcutaneous tocilizumab in Takayasu arteritis: multicentre retrospective study
title_full Intravenous versus subcutaneous tocilizumab in Takayasu arteritis: multicentre retrospective study
title_fullStr Intravenous versus subcutaneous tocilizumab in Takayasu arteritis: multicentre retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Intravenous versus subcutaneous tocilizumab in Takayasu arteritis: multicentre retrospective study
title_short Intravenous versus subcutaneous tocilizumab in Takayasu arteritis: multicentre retrospective study
title_sort intravenous versus subcutaneous tocilizumab in takayasu arteritis: multicentre retrospective study
topic Vasculitis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10277523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37321669
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002830
work_keys_str_mv AT mekinianarsene intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT biardlucie intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT lorenzodagna intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT novikovpaveli intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT salvaranicarlo intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT espitiaolivier intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT sciasciasavino intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT michaudmartin intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT lambertmarc intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT hernandezrodriguezjose intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT schleinitznicolas intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT awisatabid intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT puechalxavier intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT aoubaachille intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT munozponshelene intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT smitienkoilya intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT gaultierjeanbaptiste intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT edwigelemouel intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT benhamouygal intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT perlatantoinette intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT jegopatrick intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT goulenoktiphaine intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT sacrekarim intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT liogerbertrand intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT hassoldnolan intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT bronerjonathan intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT dufrostvirginie intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT senethomas intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT seguierjulie intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT maurierfrancois intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT berthiersabine intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT belotalexandre intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT frikhafaten intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT denisguillaume intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT audemardvergeralexandra intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT konepautisabelle intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT humbertsebastien intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT woayehunepascal intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT tomellerialessandro intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT baldisseraelenamarina intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT kuwanamasataka intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT logulloalberto intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT mukuchyanvahan intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT dellalazeddine intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT gachesfrancis intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT zeminskypierre intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT gallielena intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT alvaradomoya intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT boiardiluigi intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT francescomuratore intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT vautiermathieu intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT campochiarocorrado intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT moiseevsergey intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT vieiramatheus intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT cacoubpatrice intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT fainolivier intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT saadoundavid intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy
AT intravenousversussubcutaneoustocilizumabintakayasuarteritismulticentreretrospectivestudy