Cargando…

Does a novel bridging collar in endoprosthetic replacement optimise the mechanical environment for osseointegration? A finite element study

Introduction: Limb-salvage surgery using endoprosthetic replacements (EPRs) is frequently used to reconstruct segmental bone defects, but the reconstruction longevity is still a major concern. In EPRs, the stem-collar junction is the most critical region for bone resorption. We hypothesised that an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fraterrigo, Giulia, Schileo, Enrico, Simpson, David, Stevenson, Jonathan, Kendrick, Ben, Taddei, Fulvia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10277679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37342508
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1120430
_version_ 1785060337081384960
author Fraterrigo, Giulia
Schileo, Enrico
Simpson, David
Stevenson, Jonathan
Kendrick, Ben
Taddei, Fulvia
author_facet Fraterrigo, Giulia
Schileo, Enrico
Simpson, David
Stevenson, Jonathan
Kendrick, Ben
Taddei, Fulvia
author_sort Fraterrigo, Giulia
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Limb-salvage surgery using endoprosthetic replacements (EPRs) is frequently used to reconstruct segmental bone defects, but the reconstruction longevity is still a major concern. In EPRs, the stem-collar junction is the most critical region for bone resorption. We hypothesised that an in-lay collar would be more likely to promote bone ongrowth in Proximal Femur Reconstruction (PFR), and we tested this hypothesis through validated Finite Element (FE) analyses simulating the maximum load during walking. Methods: We simulated three different femur reconstruction lengths (proximal, mid-diaphyseal, and distal). For each reconstruction length one in-lay and one traditional on-lay collar model was built and compared. All reconstructions were virtually implanted in a population-average femur. Personalised Finite Element models were built from Computed Tomography for the intact case and for all reconstruction cases, including contact interfaces where appropriate. We compared the mechanical environment in the in-lay and on-lay collar configurations, through metrics of reconstruction safety, osseointegration potential, and risk of long-term bone resorption due to stress-shielding. Results: In all models, differences with respect to intact conditions were localized at the inner bone-implant interface, being more marked in the collar-bone interface. In proximal and mid-diaphyseal reconstructions, the in-lay configuration doubled the area in contact at the bone-collar interface with respect to the on-lay configuration, showed less critical values and trends of contact micromotions, and consistently showed higher (roughly double) volume percentages of predicted bone apposition and reduced (up to one-third) percentages of predicted bone resorption. In the most distal reconstruction, results for the in-lay and on-lay configurations were generally similar and showed overall less favourable maps of the bone remodelling tendency. Discussion: In summary, the models corroborate the hypothesis that an in-lay collar, by realising a more uniform load transfer into the bone with a more physiological pattern, creates an advantageous mechanical environment at the bone-collar interface, compared to an on-lay design. Therefore, it could significantly increase the survivorship of endo-prosthetic replacements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10277679
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102776792023-06-20 Does a novel bridging collar in endoprosthetic replacement optimise the mechanical environment for osseointegration? A finite element study Fraterrigo, Giulia Schileo, Enrico Simpson, David Stevenson, Jonathan Kendrick, Ben Taddei, Fulvia Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology Introduction: Limb-salvage surgery using endoprosthetic replacements (EPRs) is frequently used to reconstruct segmental bone defects, but the reconstruction longevity is still a major concern. In EPRs, the stem-collar junction is the most critical region for bone resorption. We hypothesised that an in-lay collar would be more likely to promote bone ongrowth in Proximal Femur Reconstruction (PFR), and we tested this hypothesis through validated Finite Element (FE) analyses simulating the maximum load during walking. Methods: We simulated three different femur reconstruction lengths (proximal, mid-diaphyseal, and distal). For each reconstruction length one in-lay and one traditional on-lay collar model was built and compared. All reconstructions were virtually implanted in a population-average femur. Personalised Finite Element models were built from Computed Tomography for the intact case and for all reconstruction cases, including contact interfaces where appropriate. We compared the mechanical environment in the in-lay and on-lay collar configurations, through metrics of reconstruction safety, osseointegration potential, and risk of long-term bone resorption due to stress-shielding. Results: In all models, differences with respect to intact conditions were localized at the inner bone-implant interface, being more marked in the collar-bone interface. In proximal and mid-diaphyseal reconstructions, the in-lay configuration doubled the area in contact at the bone-collar interface with respect to the on-lay configuration, showed less critical values and trends of contact micromotions, and consistently showed higher (roughly double) volume percentages of predicted bone apposition and reduced (up to one-third) percentages of predicted bone resorption. In the most distal reconstruction, results for the in-lay and on-lay configurations were generally similar and showed overall less favourable maps of the bone remodelling tendency. Discussion: In summary, the models corroborate the hypothesis that an in-lay collar, by realising a more uniform load transfer into the bone with a more physiological pattern, creates an advantageous mechanical environment at the bone-collar interface, compared to an on-lay design. Therefore, it could significantly increase the survivorship of endo-prosthetic replacements. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10277679/ /pubmed/37342508 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1120430 Text en Copyright © 2023 Fraterrigo, Schileo, Simpson, Stevenson, Kendrick and Taddei. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Fraterrigo, Giulia
Schileo, Enrico
Simpson, David
Stevenson, Jonathan
Kendrick, Ben
Taddei, Fulvia
Does a novel bridging collar in endoprosthetic replacement optimise the mechanical environment for osseointegration? A finite element study
title Does a novel bridging collar in endoprosthetic replacement optimise the mechanical environment for osseointegration? A finite element study
title_full Does a novel bridging collar in endoprosthetic replacement optimise the mechanical environment for osseointegration? A finite element study
title_fullStr Does a novel bridging collar in endoprosthetic replacement optimise the mechanical environment for osseointegration? A finite element study
title_full_unstemmed Does a novel bridging collar in endoprosthetic replacement optimise the mechanical environment for osseointegration? A finite element study
title_short Does a novel bridging collar in endoprosthetic replacement optimise the mechanical environment for osseointegration? A finite element study
title_sort does a novel bridging collar in endoprosthetic replacement optimise the mechanical environment for osseointegration? a finite element study
topic Bioengineering and Biotechnology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10277679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37342508
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1120430
work_keys_str_mv AT fraterrigogiulia doesanovelbridgingcollarinendoprostheticreplacementoptimisethemechanicalenvironmentforosseointegrationafiniteelementstudy
AT schileoenrico doesanovelbridgingcollarinendoprostheticreplacementoptimisethemechanicalenvironmentforosseointegrationafiniteelementstudy
AT simpsondavid doesanovelbridgingcollarinendoprostheticreplacementoptimisethemechanicalenvironmentforosseointegrationafiniteelementstudy
AT stevensonjonathan doesanovelbridgingcollarinendoprostheticreplacementoptimisethemechanicalenvironmentforosseointegrationafiniteelementstudy
AT kendrickben doesanovelbridgingcollarinendoprostheticreplacementoptimisethemechanicalenvironmentforosseointegrationafiniteelementstudy
AT taddeifulvia doesanovelbridgingcollarinendoprostheticreplacementoptimisethemechanicalenvironmentforosseointegrationafiniteelementstudy