Cargando…

Impact of hearing aid technology level at first-fit on self-reported outcomes in patients with presbycusis: a randomized controlled trial

To provide clinical guidance in hearing aid prescription for older adults with presbycusis, we investigated differences in self-reported hearing abilities and hearing aid effectiveness for premium or basic hearing aid users. Secondly, as an explorative analysis, we investigated if differences in gai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Houmøller, Sabina Storbjerg, Wolff, Anne, Tsai, Li-Tang, Narayanan, Sreeram Kaithali, Hougaard, Dan Dupont, Gaihede, Michael Lyhne, Neher, Tobias, Godballe, Christian, Schmidt, Jesper Hvass
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10277865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37342862
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fragi.2023.1158272
_version_ 1785060378060783616
author Houmøller, Sabina Storbjerg
Wolff, Anne
Tsai, Li-Tang
Narayanan, Sreeram Kaithali
Hougaard, Dan Dupont
Gaihede, Michael Lyhne
Neher, Tobias
Godballe, Christian
Schmidt, Jesper Hvass
author_facet Houmøller, Sabina Storbjerg
Wolff, Anne
Tsai, Li-Tang
Narayanan, Sreeram Kaithali
Hougaard, Dan Dupont
Gaihede, Michael Lyhne
Neher, Tobias
Godballe, Christian
Schmidt, Jesper Hvass
author_sort Houmøller, Sabina Storbjerg
collection PubMed
description To provide clinical guidance in hearing aid prescription for older adults with presbycusis, we investigated differences in self-reported hearing abilities and hearing aid effectiveness for premium or basic hearing aid users. Secondly, as an explorative analysis, we investigated if differences in gain prescription verified with real-ear measurements explain differences in self-reported outcomes. The study was designed as a randomized controlled trial in which the patients were blinded towards the purpose of the study. In total, 190 first-time hearing aid users (>60 years of age) with symmetric bilateral presbycusis were fitted with either a premium or basic hearing aid. The randomization was stratified on age, sex, and word recognition score. Two outcome questionnaires were distributed: the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA) and the short form of the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ-12). In addition, insertion gains were calculated from real-ear measurements at first-fit for all fitted hearing aids. Premium hearing aid users reported 0.7 (95%CI: 0.2; 1.1) scale points higher total SSQ-12 score per item and 0.8 (95%CI: 0.2; 1.4) scale points higher speech score per item, as well as 0.6 (95%CI: 0.2; 1.1) scale points higher qualities score compared to basic-feature hearing aid users. No significant differences in reported hearing aid effectiveness were found using the IOI-HA. Differences in the prescribed gain at 1 and 2 kHz were observed between premium and basic hearing aids within each company. Premium-feature devices yielded slightly better self-reported hearing abilities than basic-feature devices, but a statistically significant difference was only found in three out of seven outcome variables, and the effect was small. The generalizability of the study is limited to community-dwelling older adults with presbycusis. Thus, further research is needed for understanding the potential effects of hearing aid technology for other populations. Hearing care providers should continue to insist on research to support the choice of more costly premium technologies when prescribing hearing aids for older adults with presbycusis. Clinical Trial Registration: https://register.clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT04539847.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10277865
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102778652023-06-20 Impact of hearing aid technology level at first-fit on self-reported outcomes in patients with presbycusis: a randomized controlled trial Houmøller, Sabina Storbjerg Wolff, Anne Tsai, Li-Tang Narayanan, Sreeram Kaithali Hougaard, Dan Dupont Gaihede, Michael Lyhne Neher, Tobias Godballe, Christian Schmidt, Jesper Hvass Front Aging Aging To provide clinical guidance in hearing aid prescription for older adults with presbycusis, we investigated differences in self-reported hearing abilities and hearing aid effectiveness for premium or basic hearing aid users. Secondly, as an explorative analysis, we investigated if differences in gain prescription verified with real-ear measurements explain differences in self-reported outcomes. The study was designed as a randomized controlled trial in which the patients were blinded towards the purpose of the study. In total, 190 first-time hearing aid users (>60 years of age) with symmetric bilateral presbycusis were fitted with either a premium or basic hearing aid. The randomization was stratified on age, sex, and word recognition score. Two outcome questionnaires were distributed: the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA) and the short form of the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ-12). In addition, insertion gains were calculated from real-ear measurements at first-fit for all fitted hearing aids. Premium hearing aid users reported 0.7 (95%CI: 0.2; 1.1) scale points higher total SSQ-12 score per item and 0.8 (95%CI: 0.2; 1.4) scale points higher speech score per item, as well as 0.6 (95%CI: 0.2; 1.1) scale points higher qualities score compared to basic-feature hearing aid users. No significant differences in reported hearing aid effectiveness were found using the IOI-HA. Differences in the prescribed gain at 1 and 2 kHz were observed between premium and basic hearing aids within each company. Premium-feature devices yielded slightly better self-reported hearing abilities than basic-feature devices, but a statistically significant difference was only found in three out of seven outcome variables, and the effect was small. The generalizability of the study is limited to community-dwelling older adults with presbycusis. Thus, further research is needed for understanding the potential effects of hearing aid technology for other populations. Hearing care providers should continue to insist on research to support the choice of more costly premium technologies when prescribing hearing aids for older adults with presbycusis. Clinical Trial Registration: https://register.clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT04539847. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10277865/ /pubmed/37342862 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fragi.2023.1158272 Text en Copyright © 2023 Houmøller, Wolff, Tsai, Narayanan, Hougaard, Gaihede, Neher, Godballe and Schmidt. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Aging
Houmøller, Sabina Storbjerg
Wolff, Anne
Tsai, Li-Tang
Narayanan, Sreeram Kaithali
Hougaard, Dan Dupont
Gaihede, Michael Lyhne
Neher, Tobias
Godballe, Christian
Schmidt, Jesper Hvass
Impact of hearing aid technology level at first-fit on self-reported outcomes in patients with presbycusis: a randomized controlled trial
title Impact of hearing aid technology level at first-fit on self-reported outcomes in patients with presbycusis: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Impact of hearing aid technology level at first-fit on self-reported outcomes in patients with presbycusis: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Impact of hearing aid technology level at first-fit on self-reported outcomes in patients with presbycusis: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Impact of hearing aid technology level at first-fit on self-reported outcomes in patients with presbycusis: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Impact of hearing aid technology level at first-fit on self-reported outcomes in patients with presbycusis: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort impact of hearing aid technology level at first-fit on self-reported outcomes in patients with presbycusis: a randomized controlled trial
topic Aging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10277865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37342862
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fragi.2023.1158272
work_keys_str_mv AT houmøllersabinastorbjerg impactofhearingaidtechnologylevelatfirstfitonselfreportedoutcomesinpatientswithpresbycusisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wolffanne impactofhearingaidtechnologylevelatfirstfitonselfreportedoutcomesinpatientswithpresbycusisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tsailitang impactofhearingaidtechnologylevelatfirstfitonselfreportedoutcomesinpatientswithpresbycusisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT narayanansreeramkaithali impactofhearingaidtechnologylevelatfirstfitonselfreportedoutcomesinpatientswithpresbycusisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hougaarddandupont impactofhearingaidtechnologylevelatfirstfitonselfreportedoutcomesinpatientswithpresbycusisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gaihedemichaellyhne impactofhearingaidtechnologylevelatfirstfitonselfreportedoutcomesinpatientswithpresbycusisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nehertobias impactofhearingaidtechnologylevelatfirstfitonselfreportedoutcomesinpatientswithpresbycusisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT godballechristian impactofhearingaidtechnologylevelatfirstfitonselfreportedoutcomesinpatientswithpresbycusisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT schmidtjesperhvass impactofhearingaidtechnologylevelatfirstfitonselfreportedoutcomesinpatientswithpresbycusisarandomizedcontrolledtrial