Cargando…

A deep-learning-based dose verification tool utilizing fluence maps for a cobalt-60 compensator-based intensity-modulated radiation therapy system

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A novel cobalt-60 compensator-based intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) system was developed for a resource-limited environment but lacked an efficient dose verification algorithm. The aim of this study was to develop a deep-learning-based dose verification algorithm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oh, Kyuhak, Gronberg, Mary P., Netherton, Tucker J., Sengupta, Bishwambhar, Cardenas, Carlos E., Court, Laurence E., Ford, Eric C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10277917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37342210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2023.100440
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A novel cobalt-60 compensator-based intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) system was developed for a resource-limited environment but lacked an efficient dose verification algorithm. The aim of this study was to develop a deep-learning-based dose verification algorithm for accurate and rapid dose predictions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A deep-learning network was employed to predict the doses from static fields related to beam commissioning. Inputs were a cube-shaped phantom, a beam binary mask, and an intersecting volume of the phantom and beam binary mask, while output was a 3-dimensional (3D) dose. The same network was extended to predict patient-specific doses for head and neck cancers using two different approaches. A field-based method predicted doses for each field and combined all calculated doses into a plan, while the plan-based method combined all nine fluences into a plan to predict doses. Inputs included patient computed tomography (CT) scans, binary beam masks, and fluence maps truncated to the patient's CT in 3D. RESULTS: For static fields, predictions agreed well with ground truths with average deviations of less than 0.5% for percent depth doses and profiles. Even though the field-based method showed excellent prediction performance for each field, the plan-based method showed better agreement between clinical and predicted dose distributions. The distributed dose deviations for all planned target volumes and organs at risk were within 1.3 Gy. The calculation speed for each case was within two seconds. CONCLUSIONS: A deep-learning-based dose verification tool can accurately and rapidly predict doses for a novel cobalt-60 compensator-based IMRT system.