Cargando…

Pre‐clinical evaluation of APrevent® VOIS for unilateral vocal fold paralysis medialization

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the concept and efficacy of an adjustable implant (Prototype SH30: porcine implant and APrevent® VOIS: human concept) for treatment of unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP) via in vivo mini‐pig studies, human computed tomographic (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) image analysi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ho, Guan‐Min, Rast, Jasmin, Hsieh, Li‐Chun, Böttcher, Arne, Meng, Stefan, Reissig, Lukas F., Tzou, Chieh‐Han, Hess, Markus Maria, Schneider‐Stickler, Berit, Jiang, Jack, Lai, Yin‐Ta, Yuan, Sheng‐Po, Wang, Ying‐Piao, Geyer, Stefan H., Weninger, Wolfgang J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10278099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37342118
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.1059
_version_ 1785060412551593984
author Ho, Guan‐Min
Rast, Jasmin
Hsieh, Li‐Chun
Böttcher, Arne
Meng, Stefan
Reissig, Lukas F.
Tzou, Chieh‐Han
Hess, Markus Maria
Schneider‐Stickler, Berit
Jiang, Jack
Lai, Yin‐Ta
Yuan, Sheng‐Po
Wang, Ying‐Piao
Geyer, Stefan H.
Weninger, Wolfgang J.
author_facet Ho, Guan‐Min
Rast, Jasmin
Hsieh, Li‐Chun
Böttcher, Arne
Meng, Stefan
Reissig, Lukas F.
Tzou, Chieh‐Han
Hess, Markus Maria
Schneider‐Stickler, Berit
Jiang, Jack
Lai, Yin‐Ta
Yuan, Sheng‐Po
Wang, Ying‐Piao
Geyer, Stefan H.
Weninger, Wolfgang J.
author_sort Ho, Guan‐Min
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the concept and efficacy of an adjustable implant (Prototype SH30: porcine implant and APrevent® VOIS: human concept) for treatment of unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP) via in vivo mini‐pig studies, human computed tomographic (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) image analysis, ex‐vivo aerodynamic and acoustic analysis. METHODS: Feasibility testing and prototype implantation were performed using in‐vivo UVFP porcine model (n = 8), followed by a dimensional finding study using CT and MR scans of larynges (n = 75) for modification of the implant prototypes. Acoustic and aerodynamic measurements were recorded on excised canine (n = 7) larynges with simulated UVFP before and after medialization with VOIS‐Implant. RESULTS: The prototype showed in the in‐vivo UVFP porcine model an improved glottic closure from grade 6 incomplete closure to complete closure (n = 5), to grade 2 incomplete closure (n = 2) and grade 3 incomplete closure (n = 1). On human CT/MR scans the identification of the correct size was successful in 97.3% using the thyroid cartilage alar “distance S” as the only parameter, which is an important step towards procedure standardization and implant design. Results were confirmed with implantation in human laryngeal cadavers (n = 44). Measurements of the acoustic and aerodynamic effects after implantation showed a significant decreased phonation threshold pressure (p = .0187), phonation threshold flow (p = .0001) and phonation threshold power (p = .0046) on excised canine larynges with simulated UVFP. Percent jitter and percent shimmer decreased (p = .2976; p = .1771) but not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the preclinical results four sizes, differing in medial length, implant width and expansion direction of silicone cushions, seem to be enough to satisfy laryngeal size variations. This concept is significantly effective in medializing UVFP and improving the aerodynamic and acoustic qualities of phonation as reported in a preliminary clinical outcome study with long‐term implantation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10278099
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102780992023-06-20 Pre‐clinical evaluation of APrevent® VOIS for unilateral vocal fold paralysis medialization Ho, Guan‐Min Rast, Jasmin Hsieh, Li‐Chun Böttcher, Arne Meng, Stefan Reissig, Lukas F. Tzou, Chieh‐Han Hess, Markus Maria Schneider‐Stickler, Berit Jiang, Jack Lai, Yin‐Ta Yuan, Sheng‐Po Wang, Ying‐Piao Geyer, Stefan H. Weninger, Wolfgang J. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Laryngology, Speech and Language Science OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the concept and efficacy of an adjustable implant (Prototype SH30: porcine implant and APrevent® VOIS: human concept) for treatment of unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP) via in vivo mini‐pig studies, human computed tomographic (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) image analysis, ex‐vivo aerodynamic and acoustic analysis. METHODS: Feasibility testing and prototype implantation were performed using in‐vivo UVFP porcine model (n = 8), followed by a dimensional finding study using CT and MR scans of larynges (n = 75) for modification of the implant prototypes. Acoustic and aerodynamic measurements were recorded on excised canine (n = 7) larynges with simulated UVFP before and after medialization with VOIS‐Implant. RESULTS: The prototype showed in the in‐vivo UVFP porcine model an improved glottic closure from grade 6 incomplete closure to complete closure (n = 5), to grade 2 incomplete closure (n = 2) and grade 3 incomplete closure (n = 1). On human CT/MR scans the identification of the correct size was successful in 97.3% using the thyroid cartilage alar “distance S” as the only parameter, which is an important step towards procedure standardization and implant design. Results were confirmed with implantation in human laryngeal cadavers (n = 44). Measurements of the acoustic and aerodynamic effects after implantation showed a significant decreased phonation threshold pressure (p = .0187), phonation threshold flow (p = .0001) and phonation threshold power (p = .0046) on excised canine larynges with simulated UVFP. Percent jitter and percent shimmer decreased (p = .2976; p = .1771) but not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the preclinical results four sizes, differing in medial length, implant width and expansion direction of silicone cushions, seem to be enough to satisfy laryngeal size variations. This concept is significantly effective in medializing UVFP and improving the aerodynamic and acoustic qualities of phonation as reported in a preliminary clinical outcome study with long‐term implantation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2023-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10278099/ /pubmed/37342118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.1059 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Triological Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Laryngology, Speech and Language Science
Ho, Guan‐Min
Rast, Jasmin
Hsieh, Li‐Chun
Böttcher, Arne
Meng, Stefan
Reissig, Lukas F.
Tzou, Chieh‐Han
Hess, Markus Maria
Schneider‐Stickler, Berit
Jiang, Jack
Lai, Yin‐Ta
Yuan, Sheng‐Po
Wang, Ying‐Piao
Geyer, Stefan H.
Weninger, Wolfgang J.
Pre‐clinical evaluation of APrevent® VOIS for unilateral vocal fold paralysis medialization
title Pre‐clinical evaluation of APrevent® VOIS for unilateral vocal fold paralysis medialization
title_full Pre‐clinical evaluation of APrevent® VOIS for unilateral vocal fold paralysis medialization
title_fullStr Pre‐clinical evaluation of APrevent® VOIS for unilateral vocal fold paralysis medialization
title_full_unstemmed Pre‐clinical evaluation of APrevent® VOIS for unilateral vocal fold paralysis medialization
title_short Pre‐clinical evaluation of APrevent® VOIS for unilateral vocal fold paralysis medialization
title_sort pre‐clinical evaluation of aprevent® vois for unilateral vocal fold paralysis medialization
topic Laryngology, Speech and Language Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10278099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37342118
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.1059
work_keys_str_mv AT hoguanmin preclinicalevaluationofapreventvoisforunilateralvocalfoldparalysismedialization
AT rastjasmin preclinicalevaluationofapreventvoisforunilateralvocalfoldparalysismedialization
AT hsiehlichun preclinicalevaluationofapreventvoisforunilateralvocalfoldparalysismedialization
AT bottcherarne preclinicalevaluationofapreventvoisforunilateralvocalfoldparalysismedialization
AT mengstefan preclinicalevaluationofapreventvoisforunilateralvocalfoldparalysismedialization
AT reissiglukasf preclinicalevaluationofapreventvoisforunilateralvocalfoldparalysismedialization
AT tzouchiehhan preclinicalevaluationofapreventvoisforunilateralvocalfoldparalysismedialization
AT hessmarkusmaria preclinicalevaluationofapreventvoisforunilateralvocalfoldparalysismedialization
AT schneidersticklerberit preclinicalevaluationofapreventvoisforunilateralvocalfoldparalysismedialization
AT jiangjack preclinicalevaluationofapreventvoisforunilateralvocalfoldparalysismedialization
AT laiyinta preclinicalevaluationofapreventvoisforunilateralvocalfoldparalysismedialization
AT yuanshengpo preclinicalevaluationofapreventvoisforunilateralvocalfoldparalysismedialization
AT wangyingpiao preclinicalevaluationofapreventvoisforunilateralvocalfoldparalysismedialization
AT geyerstefanh preclinicalevaluationofapreventvoisforunilateralvocalfoldparalysismedialization
AT weningerwolfgangj preclinicalevaluationofapreventvoisforunilateralvocalfoldparalysismedialization