Cargando…

Quantitative vestibular assessment: The development and validation of a novel, remote video head impulse test against in‐clinic measurements

OBJECTIVES: To develop a novel remote head impulse test (rHIT), and to provide preliminary data validating the rHIT vestibular‐ocular reflex (VOR) gains against the in‐clinic vHIT. METHODS: A convenience sample of 10 patients referred for vestibular assessment at our institution was recruited. In‐cl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: So, Raymond J., Cevallos, Ashley, Pile, Macie, Biju, Kevin, Perez‐Heydrich, Carlos, Padova, Dominic, Walker, Courtney, Schubert, Michael, Agrawal, Yuri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10278116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37342103
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.1069
_version_ 1785060416517308416
author So, Raymond J.
Cevallos, Ashley
Pile, Macie
Biju, Kevin
Perez‐Heydrich, Carlos
Padova, Dominic
Walker, Courtney
Schubert, Michael
Agrawal, Yuri
author_facet So, Raymond J.
Cevallos, Ashley
Pile, Macie
Biju, Kevin
Perez‐Heydrich, Carlos
Padova, Dominic
Walker, Courtney
Schubert, Michael
Agrawal, Yuri
author_sort So, Raymond J.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To develop a novel remote head impulse test (rHIT), and to provide preliminary data validating the rHIT vestibular‐ocular reflex (VOR) gains against the in‐clinic vHIT. METHODS: A convenience sample of 10 patients referred for vestibular assessment at our institution was recruited. In‐clinic vHIT was used to quantify lateral VOR gains. Patients subsequently underwent an rHIT protocol, whereby patients performed active, lateral head rotations while their eyes and heads were recorded using a laptop camera and video‐conferencing software. The vHIT and rHIT VOR gains were compared using paired t‐tests, and a Pearson correlation coefficient between the gains was calculated. Absolute accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the rHIT were additionally calculated. RESULTS: Of the 10 patients recruited, 4 were male, and the average ± standard deviation (SD) age was 61.4 ± 15.3 years. As determined by the vHIT, 2 patients had normal bilateral VOR gains, 6 with unilateral vestibular hypofunction, and 2 with bilateral vestibular hypofunction. The correlation between the rHIT and vHIT gains was 0.73 (p < .001). The rHIT exhibited an absolute accuracy of 75.0%, sensitivity of 70.0%, and specificity of 80.0%. When ears had a vHIT VOR gain less than 0.40, the rHIT exhibited 100.0% accuracy. Conversely, 60.0% of deficient ears with vHIT VOR gains greater than 0.40 were incorrectly categorized by the rHIT. CONCLUSION: The rHIT may be better suited for detecting more severe vestibular deficiencies. Future iterations of the rHIT should aim to increase the video frame‐rate capabilities to detect subtler VOR impairments. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10278116
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102781162023-06-20 Quantitative vestibular assessment: The development and validation of a novel, remote video head impulse test against in‐clinic measurements So, Raymond J. Cevallos, Ashley Pile, Macie Biju, Kevin Perez‐Heydrich, Carlos Padova, Dominic Walker, Courtney Schubert, Michael Agrawal, Yuri Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Otology, Neurotology, and Neuroscience OBJECTIVES: To develop a novel remote head impulse test (rHIT), and to provide preliminary data validating the rHIT vestibular‐ocular reflex (VOR) gains against the in‐clinic vHIT. METHODS: A convenience sample of 10 patients referred for vestibular assessment at our institution was recruited. In‐clinic vHIT was used to quantify lateral VOR gains. Patients subsequently underwent an rHIT protocol, whereby patients performed active, lateral head rotations while their eyes and heads were recorded using a laptop camera and video‐conferencing software. The vHIT and rHIT VOR gains were compared using paired t‐tests, and a Pearson correlation coefficient between the gains was calculated. Absolute accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the rHIT were additionally calculated. RESULTS: Of the 10 patients recruited, 4 were male, and the average ± standard deviation (SD) age was 61.4 ± 15.3 years. As determined by the vHIT, 2 patients had normal bilateral VOR gains, 6 with unilateral vestibular hypofunction, and 2 with bilateral vestibular hypofunction. The correlation between the rHIT and vHIT gains was 0.73 (p < .001). The rHIT exhibited an absolute accuracy of 75.0%, sensitivity of 70.0%, and specificity of 80.0%. When ears had a vHIT VOR gain less than 0.40, the rHIT exhibited 100.0% accuracy. Conversely, 60.0% of deficient ears with vHIT VOR gains greater than 0.40 were incorrectly categorized by the rHIT. CONCLUSION: The rHIT may be better suited for detecting more severe vestibular deficiencies. Future iterations of the rHIT should aim to increase the video frame‐rate capabilities to detect subtler VOR impairments. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2023-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10278116/ /pubmed/37342103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.1069 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Triological Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Otology, Neurotology, and Neuroscience
So, Raymond J.
Cevallos, Ashley
Pile, Macie
Biju, Kevin
Perez‐Heydrich, Carlos
Padova, Dominic
Walker, Courtney
Schubert, Michael
Agrawal, Yuri
Quantitative vestibular assessment: The development and validation of a novel, remote video head impulse test against in‐clinic measurements
title Quantitative vestibular assessment: The development and validation of a novel, remote video head impulse test against in‐clinic measurements
title_full Quantitative vestibular assessment: The development and validation of a novel, remote video head impulse test against in‐clinic measurements
title_fullStr Quantitative vestibular assessment: The development and validation of a novel, remote video head impulse test against in‐clinic measurements
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative vestibular assessment: The development and validation of a novel, remote video head impulse test against in‐clinic measurements
title_short Quantitative vestibular assessment: The development and validation of a novel, remote video head impulse test against in‐clinic measurements
title_sort quantitative vestibular assessment: the development and validation of a novel, remote video head impulse test against in‐clinic measurements
topic Otology, Neurotology, and Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10278116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37342103
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.1069
work_keys_str_mv AT soraymondj quantitativevestibularassessmentthedevelopmentandvalidationofanovelremotevideoheadimpulsetestagainstinclinicmeasurements
AT cevallosashley quantitativevestibularassessmentthedevelopmentandvalidationofanovelremotevideoheadimpulsetestagainstinclinicmeasurements
AT pilemacie quantitativevestibularassessmentthedevelopmentandvalidationofanovelremotevideoheadimpulsetestagainstinclinicmeasurements
AT bijukevin quantitativevestibularassessmentthedevelopmentandvalidationofanovelremotevideoheadimpulsetestagainstinclinicmeasurements
AT perezheydrichcarlos quantitativevestibularassessmentthedevelopmentandvalidationofanovelremotevideoheadimpulsetestagainstinclinicmeasurements
AT padovadominic quantitativevestibularassessmentthedevelopmentandvalidationofanovelremotevideoheadimpulsetestagainstinclinicmeasurements
AT walkercourtney quantitativevestibularassessmentthedevelopmentandvalidationofanovelremotevideoheadimpulsetestagainstinclinicmeasurements
AT schubertmichael quantitativevestibularassessmentthedevelopmentandvalidationofanovelremotevideoheadimpulsetestagainstinclinicmeasurements
AT agrawalyuri quantitativevestibularassessmentthedevelopmentandvalidationofanovelremotevideoheadimpulsetestagainstinclinicmeasurements