Cargando…

Cultivar-dependent differences in tuber growth cause increased soil resistance in potato fields

Since soil compaction of potato fields delays shoot emergence and decreases total yield, the causes and effects of this compaction need to be better understood. In a controlled environment trial with young (before tuber initiation) plants, roots of cv. Inca Bella (a phureja group cultivar) were more...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Skilleter, Patrick, Nelson, David, Dodd, Ian C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10278232/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37342146
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1095790
_version_ 1785060439613243392
author Skilleter, Patrick
Nelson, David
Dodd, Ian C.
author_facet Skilleter, Patrick
Nelson, David
Dodd, Ian C.
author_sort Skilleter, Patrick
collection PubMed
description Since soil compaction of potato fields delays shoot emergence and decreases total yield, the causes and effects of this compaction need to be better understood. In a controlled environment trial with young (before tuber initiation) plants, roots of cv. Inca Bella (a phureja group cultivar) were more sensitive to increased soil resistance (3.0 MPa) than cv. Maris Piper (a tuberosum group cultivar). Such variation was hypothesized to cause yield differences in two field trials, in which compaction treatments were applied after tuber planting. Trial 1 increased initial soil resistance from 0.15 MPa to 0.3 MPa. By the end of the growing season, soil resistance increased three-fold in the upper 20 cm of the soil, but resistance in Maris Piper plots was up to twice that of Inca Bella plots. Maris Piper yield was 60% higher than Inca Bella and independent of soil compaction treatment, whilst compacted soil reduced Inca Bella yield by 30%. Trial 2 increased initial soil resistance from 0.2 MPa to 1.0 MPa. Soil resistance in the compacted treatments increased to similar, cultivar-dependent resistances as trial 1. Maris Piper yield was 12% higher than Inca Bella, but cultivar variation in yield response to compacted soil did not occur. Soil water content, root growth and tuber growth were measured to determine whether these factors could explain cultivar differences in soil resistance. Soil water content was similar between cultivars, thus did not cause soil resistance to vary between cultivars. Root density was insufficient to cause observed increases soil resistance. Finally, differences in soil resistance between cultivars became significant during tuber initiation, and became more pronounced until harvest. Increased tuber biomass volume (yield) of Maris Piper increased estimated mean soil density (and thus soil resistance) more than Inca Bella. This increase seems to depend on initial compaction, as soil resistance did not significantly increase in uncompacted soil. While increased soil resistance caused cultivar-dependent restriction of root density of young plants that was consistent with cultivar variation in yield, tuber growth likely caused cultivar-dependent increases in soil resistance in field trials, which may have further limited Inca Bella yield.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10278232
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102782322023-06-20 Cultivar-dependent differences in tuber growth cause increased soil resistance in potato fields Skilleter, Patrick Nelson, David Dodd, Ian C. Front Plant Sci Plant Science Since soil compaction of potato fields delays shoot emergence and decreases total yield, the causes and effects of this compaction need to be better understood. In a controlled environment trial with young (before tuber initiation) plants, roots of cv. Inca Bella (a phureja group cultivar) were more sensitive to increased soil resistance (3.0 MPa) than cv. Maris Piper (a tuberosum group cultivar). Such variation was hypothesized to cause yield differences in two field trials, in which compaction treatments were applied after tuber planting. Trial 1 increased initial soil resistance from 0.15 MPa to 0.3 MPa. By the end of the growing season, soil resistance increased three-fold in the upper 20 cm of the soil, but resistance in Maris Piper plots was up to twice that of Inca Bella plots. Maris Piper yield was 60% higher than Inca Bella and independent of soil compaction treatment, whilst compacted soil reduced Inca Bella yield by 30%. Trial 2 increased initial soil resistance from 0.2 MPa to 1.0 MPa. Soil resistance in the compacted treatments increased to similar, cultivar-dependent resistances as trial 1. Maris Piper yield was 12% higher than Inca Bella, but cultivar variation in yield response to compacted soil did not occur. Soil water content, root growth and tuber growth were measured to determine whether these factors could explain cultivar differences in soil resistance. Soil water content was similar between cultivars, thus did not cause soil resistance to vary between cultivars. Root density was insufficient to cause observed increases soil resistance. Finally, differences in soil resistance between cultivars became significant during tuber initiation, and became more pronounced until harvest. Increased tuber biomass volume (yield) of Maris Piper increased estimated mean soil density (and thus soil resistance) more than Inca Bella. This increase seems to depend on initial compaction, as soil resistance did not significantly increase in uncompacted soil. While increased soil resistance caused cultivar-dependent restriction of root density of young plants that was consistent with cultivar variation in yield, tuber growth likely caused cultivar-dependent increases in soil resistance in field trials, which may have further limited Inca Bella yield. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10278232/ /pubmed/37342146 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1095790 Text en Copyright © 2023 Skilleter, Nelson and Dodd https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Skilleter, Patrick
Nelson, David
Dodd, Ian C.
Cultivar-dependent differences in tuber growth cause increased soil resistance in potato fields
title Cultivar-dependent differences in tuber growth cause increased soil resistance in potato fields
title_full Cultivar-dependent differences in tuber growth cause increased soil resistance in potato fields
title_fullStr Cultivar-dependent differences in tuber growth cause increased soil resistance in potato fields
title_full_unstemmed Cultivar-dependent differences in tuber growth cause increased soil resistance in potato fields
title_short Cultivar-dependent differences in tuber growth cause increased soil resistance in potato fields
title_sort cultivar-dependent differences in tuber growth cause increased soil resistance in potato fields
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10278232/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37342146
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1095790
work_keys_str_mv AT skilleterpatrick cultivardependentdifferencesintubergrowthcauseincreasedsoilresistanceinpotatofields
AT nelsondavid cultivardependentdifferencesintubergrowthcauseincreasedsoilresistanceinpotatofields
AT doddianc cultivardependentdifferencesintubergrowthcauseincreasedsoilresistanceinpotatofields