Cargando…

Awake prone positioning for non-intubated patients with COVID-19-related acute hypoxic respiratory failure: a systematic review based on eight high-quality randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND: Awake prone positioning has been widely used in non-intubated patients with acute hypoxic respiratory failure (AHRF) due to COVID-19, but the evidence is mostly from observational studies and low-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs), with conflicting results from published studies...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cao, Wen, He, Nannan, Luo, Yannian, Zhang, Zhiming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10278266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37337193
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08393-8
_version_ 1785060446714200064
author Cao, Wen
He, Nannan
Luo, Yannian
Zhang, Zhiming
author_facet Cao, Wen
He, Nannan
Luo, Yannian
Zhang, Zhiming
author_sort Cao, Wen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Awake prone positioning has been widely used in non-intubated patients with acute hypoxic respiratory failure (AHRF) due to COVID-19, but the evidence is mostly from observational studies and low-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs), with conflicting results from published studies. A systematic review of published high-quality RCTs to resolve the controversy over the efficacy and safety of awake prone positioning in non-intubated patients with AHRF due to COVID-19. METHODS: Candidate studies were identified through searches of PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, Embase, Scopus databases from December 1, 2019 to November 1, 2022. Literature screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment were independently conducted by two researchers. RESULTS: Eight RCTs involving 2657 patients were included. Meta-analysis of fixed effects models showed that awake prone positioning did not increase mortality(OR = 0.88, 95%CI [0.72, 1.08]), length of stay in ICU (WMD = 1.14, 95%CI [-0.45, 2.72]), total length of stay (WMD = 0.11, 95%CI [-1.02, 1.23]), or incidence of adverse events (OR = 1.02, 95%CI [0.79, 1.31]) compared with usual care, but significantly reduced the intubation rate (OR = 0.72, 95%CI [0.60, 0.86]). Similar results were found in a subgroup analysis of patients who received only high flow nasal cannula (Mortality: OR = 0.86, 95%CI [0.70, 1.05]; Intubation rate: OR = 0.69, 95%CI [0.58, 0.83]). All eight RCTs had high quality of evidence, which ensured the reliability of the meta-analysis results. CONCLUSIONS: Awake prone positioning is safe and feasible in non-intubated patients with AHRF caused by COVID-19, and can significantly reduce the intubation rate. More studies are needed to explore standardized implementation strategies for the awake prone positioning. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CRD42023394113. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-023-08393-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10278266
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102782662023-06-20 Awake prone positioning for non-intubated patients with COVID-19-related acute hypoxic respiratory failure: a systematic review based on eight high-quality randomized controlled trials Cao, Wen He, Nannan Luo, Yannian Zhang, Zhiming BMC Infect Dis Research BACKGROUND: Awake prone positioning has been widely used in non-intubated patients with acute hypoxic respiratory failure (AHRF) due to COVID-19, but the evidence is mostly from observational studies and low-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs), with conflicting results from published studies. A systematic review of published high-quality RCTs to resolve the controversy over the efficacy and safety of awake prone positioning in non-intubated patients with AHRF due to COVID-19. METHODS: Candidate studies were identified through searches of PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, Embase, Scopus databases from December 1, 2019 to November 1, 2022. Literature screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment were independently conducted by two researchers. RESULTS: Eight RCTs involving 2657 patients were included. Meta-analysis of fixed effects models showed that awake prone positioning did not increase mortality(OR = 0.88, 95%CI [0.72, 1.08]), length of stay in ICU (WMD = 1.14, 95%CI [-0.45, 2.72]), total length of stay (WMD = 0.11, 95%CI [-1.02, 1.23]), or incidence of adverse events (OR = 1.02, 95%CI [0.79, 1.31]) compared with usual care, but significantly reduced the intubation rate (OR = 0.72, 95%CI [0.60, 0.86]). Similar results were found in a subgroup analysis of patients who received only high flow nasal cannula (Mortality: OR = 0.86, 95%CI [0.70, 1.05]; Intubation rate: OR = 0.69, 95%CI [0.58, 0.83]). All eight RCTs had high quality of evidence, which ensured the reliability of the meta-analysis results. CONCLUSIONS: Awake prone positioning is safe and feasible in non-intubated patients with AHRF caused by COVID-19, and can significantly reduce the intubation rate. More studies are needed to explore standardized implementation strategies for the awake prone positioning. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CRD42023394113. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-023-08393-8. BioMed Central 2023-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10278266/ /pubmed/37337193 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08393-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Cao, Wen
He, Nannan
Luo, Yannian
Zhang, Zhiming
Awake prone positioning for non-intubated patients with COVID-19-related acute hypoxic respiratory failure: a systematic review based on eight high-quality randomized controlled trials
title Awake prone positioning for non-intubated patients with COVID-19-related acute hypoxic respiratory failure: a systematic review based on eight high-quality randomized controlled trials
title_full Awake prone positioning for non-intubated patients with COVID-19-related acute hypoxic respiratory failure: a systematic review based on eight high-quality randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Awake prone positioning for non-intubated patients with COVID-19-related acute hypoxic respiratory failure: a systematic review based on eight high-quality randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Awake prone positioning for non-intubated patients with COVID-19-related acute hypoxic respiratory failure: a systematic review based on eight high-quality randomized controlled trials
title_short Awake prone positioning for non-intubated patients with COVID-19-related acute hypoxic respiratory failure: a systematic review based on eight high-quality randomized controlled trials
title_sort awake prone positioning for non-intubated patients with covid-19-related acute hypoxic respiratory failure: a systematic review based on eight high-quality randomized controlled trials
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10278266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37337193
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08393-8
work_keys_str_mv AT caowen awakepronepositioningfornonintubatedpatientswithcovid19relatedacutehypoxicrespiratoryfailureasystematicreviewbasedoneighthighqualityrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT henannan awakepronepositioningfornonintubatedpatientswithcovid19relatedacutehypoxicrespiratoryfailureasystematicreviewbasedoneighthighqualityrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT luoyannian awakepronepositioningfornonintubatedpatientswithcovid19relatedacutehypoxicrespiratoryfailureasystematicreviewbasedoneighthighqualityrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhangzhiming awakepronepositioningfornonintubatedpatientswithcovid19relatedacutehypoxicrespiratoryfailureasystematicreviewbasedoneighthighqualityrandomizedcontrolledtrials