Cargando…
Pain assessment tools for use in infants: a meta-review
BACKGROUND: Identifying pain in infants is challenging due to their inability to self-report pain, therefore the availability of valid and reliable means of assessing pain is critical. OBJECTIVE: This meta-review sought to identify evidence that could guide the selection of appropriate tools in this...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10278280/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37337167 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-023-04099-7 |
_version_ | 1785060449841053696 |
---|---|
author | Arabiat, Diana Mörelius, Evalotte Hoti, Kreshnik Hughes, Jeffery |
author_facet | Arabiat, Diana Mörelius, Evalotte Hoti, Kreshnik Hughes, Jeffery |
author_sort | Arabiat, Diana |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Identifying pain in infants is challenging due to their inability to self-report pain, therefore the availability of valid and reliable means of assessing pain is critical. OBJECTIVE: This meta-review sought to identify evidence that could guide the selection of appropriate tools in this vulnerable population. METHODS: We searched Scopus, Medline, Embase, CINAHL, MIDRIS, EMCare and Google Scholar for eligible systematic reviews. Eligible reviews documented psychometric properties of available observational tools used to assess pain in infants. RESULTS: A total of 516 reviews were identified of which 11 met our inclusion criteria. We identified 36 pain assessment tools (evaluated in 11 reviews) of which seven were reported in at least three reviews. The level of evidence reported on the psychometric properties of pain assessment tools varied widely ranging from low to good reliability and validity, whilst there are limited data on usability and clinical utility. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, no observer administered pain assessment tool can be recommended as the gold standard due to limited availability and quality of the evidence that supports their validity, reliability and clinical utility. This meta-review attempts to collate the available evidence to assist clinicians to decide on what is the most appropriate tool to use in their clinical practice setting. It is important that researchers adopt a standard approach to evaluating the psychometric properties of pain assessment tools and evaluations of the clinical utility in order that the highest level of evidence can be used to guide tool selection. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12887-023-04099-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10278280 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102782802023-06-20 Pain assessment tools for use in infants: a meta-review Arabiat, Diana Mörelius, Evalotte Hoti, Kreshnik Hughes, Jeffery BMC Pediatr Research BACKGROUND: Identifying pain in infants is challenging due to their inability to self-report pain, therefore the availability of valid and reliable means of assessing pain is critical. OBJECTIVE: This meta-review sought to identify evidence that could guide the selection of appropriate tools in this vulnerable population. METHODS: We searched Scopus, Medline, Embase, CINAHL, MIDRIS, EMCare and Google Scholar for eligible systematic reviews. Eligible reviews documented psychometric properties of available observational tools used to assess pain in infants. RESULTS: A total of 516 reviews were identified of which 11 met our inclusion criteria. We identified 36 pain assessment tools (evaluated in 11 reviews) of which seven were reported in at least three reviews. The level of evidence reported on the psychometric properties of pain assessment tools varied widely ranging from low to good reliability and validity, whilst there are limited data on usability and clinical utility. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, no observer administered pain assessment tool can be recommended as the gold standard due to limited availability and quality of the evidence that supports their validity, reliability and clinical utility. This meta-review attempts to collate the available evidence to assist clinicians to decide on what is the most appropriate tool to use in their clinical practice setting. It is important that researchers adopt a standard approach to evaluating the psychometric properties of pain assessment tools and evaluations of the clinical utility in order that the highest level of evidence can be used to guide tool selection. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12887-023-04099-7. BioMed Central 2023-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10278280/ /pubmed/37337167 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-023-04099-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Arabiat, Diana Mörelius, Evalotte Hoti, Kreshnik Hughes, Jeffery Pain assessment tools for use in infants: a meta-review |
title | Pain assessment tools for use in infants: a meta-review |
title_full | Pain assessment tools for use in infants: a meta-review |
title_fullStr | Pain assessment tools for use in infants: a meta-review |
title_full_unstemmed | Pain assessment tools for use in infants: a meta-review |
title_short | Pain assessment tools for use in infants: a meta-review |
title_sort | pain assessment tools for use in infants: a meta-review |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10278280/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37337167 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-023-04099-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT arabiatdiana painassessmenttoolsforuseininfantsametareview AT moreliusevalotte painassessmenttoolsforuseininfantsametareview AT hotikreshnik painassessmenttoolsforuseininfantsametareview AT hughesjeffery painassessmenttoolsforuseininfantsametareview |