Cargando…
Exploring the evidence base for Communities of Practice in health research and translation: a scoping review
BACKGROUND: The translation of research into healthcare practice relies on effective communication between disciplines, however strategies to address the gap between information sharing and knowledge transfer are still under exploration. Communities of Practice (CoP) are informal networks of stakeho...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10278351/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37337214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-023-01000-x |
_version_ | 1785060466895093760 |
---|---|
author | James-McAlpine, Janelle Larkins, Sarah Nagle, Cate |
author_facet | James-McAlpine, Janelle Larkins, Sarah Nagle, Cate |
author_sort | James-McAlpine, Janelle |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The translation of research into healthcare practice relies on effective communication between disciplines, however strategies to address the gap between information sharing and knowledge transfer are still under exploration. Communities of Practice (CoP) are informal networks of stakeholders with shared knowledge or endeavour and present an opportunity to address this gap beyond disciplinary boundaries. However, the evidence-base supporting their development, implementation and efficacy in health is not well described. This review explores the evidence underpinning the use of CoP in health research and translation. METHODS: A scoping review was undertaken using Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework. A comprehensive search of health databases and grey literature was performed using keywords and controlled vocabulary. Studies were not restricted by date or research method. RESULTS: A total of 1355 potentially relevant articles were identified through the global search strategy. Following screening, six articles were retained for analysis. Included studies were published between 2002 and 2013 in the United Kingdom (n = 3), Canada (n = 2) and Italy (n = 1). Three papers reported primary research; one used a quantitative methodology, one a qualitative, and one a descriptive evaluation approach. The three remaining papers explored seminal and evolving theories of CoP in the context of knowledge transfer and translation to the health sector. CONCLUSIONS: A paucity of evidence exists regarding the development and efficacy of CoP in health research and translation. Further empirical research is required to determine if communities of practice can enhance the translation of research into clinical practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12961-023-01000-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10278351 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102783512023-06-20 Exploring the evidence base for Communities of Practice in health research and translation: a scoping review James-McAlpine, Janelle Larkins, Sarah Nagle, Cate Health Res Policy Syst Review BACKGROUND: The translation of research into healthcare practice relies on effective communication between disciplines, however strategies to address the gap between information sharing and knowledge transfer are still under exploration. Communities of Practice (CoP) are informal networks of stakeholders with shared knowledge or endeavour and present an opportunity to address this gap beyond disciplinary boundaries. However, the evidence-base supporting their development, implementation and efficacy in health is not well described. This review explores the evidence underpinning the use of CoP in health research and translation. METHODS: A scoping review was undertaken using Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework. A comprehensive search of health databases and grey literature was performed using keywords and controlled vocabulary. Studies were not restricted by date or research method. RESULTS: A total of 1355 potentially relevant articles were identified through the global search strategy. Following screening, six articles were retained for analysis. Included studies were published between 2002 and 2013 in the United Kingdom (n = 3), Canada (n = 2) and Italy (n = 1). Three papers reported primary research; one used a quantitative methodology, one a qualitative, and one a descriptive evaluation approach. The three remaining papers explored seminal and evolving theories of CoP in the context of knowledge transfer and translation to the health sector. CONCLUSIONS: A paucity of evidence exists regarding the development and efficacy of CoP in health research and translation. Further empirical research is required to determine if communities of practice can enhance the translation of research into clinical practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12961-023-01000-x. BioMed Central 2023-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10278351/ /pubmed/37337214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-023-01000-x Text en © Crown 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review James-McAlpine, Janelle Larkins, Sarah Nagle, Cate Exploring the evidence base for Communities of Practice in health research and translation: a scoping review |
title | Exploring the evidence base for Communities of Practice in health research and translation: a scoping review |
title_full | Exploring the evidence base for Communities of Practice in health research and translation: a scoping review |
title_fullStr | Exploring the evidence base for Communities of Practice in health research and translation: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Exploring the evidence base for Communities of Practice in health research and translation: a scoping review |
title_short | Exploring the evidence base for Communities of Practice in health research and translation: a scoping review |
title_sort | exploring the evidence base for communities of practice in health research and translation: a scoping review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10278351/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37337214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-023-01000-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jamesmcalpinejanelle exploringtheevidencebaseforcommunitiesofpracticeinhealthresearchandtranslationascopingreview AT larkinssarah exploringtheevidencebaseforcommunitiesofpracticeinhealthresearchandtranslationascopingreview AT naglecate exploringtheevidencebaseforcommunitiesofpracticeinhealthresearchandtranslationascopingreview |