Cargando…
A comparative study on the value of lower airway exhaled nitric oxide combined with small airway parameters for diagnosing cough-variant asthma
BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of cough-variant asthma (CVA) is based on bronchial provocation test, which is challenging to be conducted. Most CVA patients have type 2 airway inflammation and small airway dysfunction. FeNO(200), reflecting small airway inflammation, may be used to diagnose CVA. OBJECTIV...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10278400/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37326344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17534666231181259 |
_version_ | 1785060478137925632 |
---|---|
author | Bai, Haodong Shi, Cuiqin Yu, Sue Wen, Siwan Sha, Bingxian Xu, Xianghuai Yu, Li |
author_facet | Bai, Haodong Shi, Cuiqin Yu, Sue Wen, Siwan Sha, Bingxian Xu, Xianghuai Yu, Li |
author_sort | Bai, Haodong |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of cough-variant asthma (CVA) is based on bronchial provocation test, which is challenging to be conducted. Most CVA patients have type 2 airway inflammation and small airway dysfunction. FeNO(200), reflecting small airway inflammation, may be used to diagnose CVA. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore and compare the value of lower airway exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO(50), FeNO(200), and CaNO) combined with small airway parameters for diagnosing CVA. METHODS: Chronic cough patients who attended the clinic from September 2021 to August 2022 were enrolled and divided into CVA group (n = 71) and non-CVA (NCVA) group (n = 212). The diagnostic values of FeNO(50), FeNO(200), concentration of alveolar nitric oxide (CaNO), maximal mid-expiratory flow (MMEF), forced expiratory flow at 75% of forced vital capacity (FEF(75%)) and forced expiratory flow at 50% of forced vital capacity (FEF(50%)) for CVA were evaluated. RESULTS: FeNO(50) [39(39) ppb versus 17(12) parts per billion (ppb), p < 0.01], FeNO(200) [17(14) ppb versus 8(5) ppb, p < 0.01] and CaNO [5.0(6.1) ppb versus 3.5(3.6) ppb, p < 0.01] in CVA group were significantly higher than those in NCVA group. The optimal cut-off values of FeNO(50), FeNO(200), and CaNO for diagnosis of CVA were 27.00 ppb [area under the curve (AUC) 0.88, sensitivity 78.87%, specificity 79.25%], 11.00 ppb (AUC 0.92, sensitivity 88.73%, specificity 81.60%) and 3.60 ppb (AUC 0.66, sensitivity 73.24%, specificity 52.36%), respectively. For diagnosing CVA, the value of FeNO(200) was better than FeNO(50) (p = 0.04). The optimal cut-off values of MMEF, FEF(75%), and FEF(50%) for the diagnosis of CVA were 63.80% (AUC 0.75, sensitivity 53.52%, specificity 86.32%), 77.9% (AUC 0.74, sensitivity 57.75%, specificity 83.49%) and 73.50% (AUC 0.75, sensitivity 60.56%, specificity 80.19%), respectively. The AUCs of FeNO(50) combined with MMEF, FEF(75%), and FEF(50%) for the diagnosis of CVA were all 0.89. The AUCs of FeNO(200) combined with MMEF, FEF(75%), and FEF(50%) for the diagnosis of CVA were all 0.93. CONCLUSION: FeNO(200) > 11 ppb contributed strongly for differentiating CVA from chronic cough, especially in patients with small airway dysfunction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10278400 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102784002023-06-20 A comparative study on the value of lower airway exhaled nitric oxide combined with small airway parameters for diagnosing cough-variant asthma Bai, Haodong Shi, Cuiqin Yu, Sue Wen, Siwan Sha, Bingxian Xu, Xianghuai Yu, Li Ther Adv Respir Dis Original Research BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of cough-variant asthma (CVA) is based on bronchial provocation test, which is challenging to be conducted. Most CVA patients have type 2 airway inflammation and small airway dysfunction. FeNO(200), reflecting small airway inflammation, may be used to diagnose CVA. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore and compare the value of lower airway exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO(50), FeNO(200), and CaNO) combined with small airway parameters for diagnosing CVA. METHODS: Chronic cough patients who attended the clinic from September 2021 to August 2022 were enrolled and divided into CVA group (n = 71) and non-CVA (NCVA) group (n = 212). The diagnostic values of FeNO(50), FeNO(200), concentration of alveolar nitric oxide (CaNO), maximal mid-expiratory flow (MMEF), forced expiratory flow at 75% of forced vital capacity (FEF(75%)) and forced expiratory flow at 50% of forced vital capacity (FEF(50%)) for CVA were evaluated. RESULTS: FeNO(50) [39(39) ppb versus 17(12) parts per billion (ppb), p < 0.01], FeNO(200) [17(14) ppb versus 8(5) ppb, p < 0.01] and CaNO [5.0(6.1) ppb versus 3.5(3.6) ppb, p < 0.01] in CVA group were significantly higher than those in NCVA group. The optimal cut-off values of FeNO(50), FeNO(200), and CaNO for diagnosis of CVA were 27.00 ppb [area under the curve (AUC) 0.88, sensitivity 78.87%, specificity 79.25%], 11.00 ppb (AUC 0.92, sensitivity 88.73%, specificity 81.60%) and 3.60 ppb (AUC 0.66, sensitivity 73.24%, specificity 52.36%), respectively. For diagnosing CVA, the value of FeNO(200) was better than FeNO(50) (p = 0.04). The optimal cut-off values of MMEF, FEF(75%), and FEF(50%) for the diagnosis of CVA were 63.80% (AUC 0.75, sensitivity 53.52%, specificity 86.32%), 77.9% (AUC 0.74, sensitivity 57.75%, specificity 83.49%) and 73.50% (AUC 0.75, sensitivity 60.56%, specificity 80.19%), respectively. The AUCs of FeNO(50) combined with MMEF, FEF(75%), and FEF(50%) for the diagnosis of CVA were all 0.89. The AUCs of FeNO(200) combined with MMEF, FEF(75%), and FEF(50%) for the diagnosis of CVA were all 0.93. CONCLUSION: FeNO(200) > 11 ppb contributed strongly for differentiating CVA from chronic cough, especially in patients with small airway dysfunction. SAGE Publications 2023-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10278400/ /pubmed/37326344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17534666231181259 Text en © The Author(s), 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Bai, Haodong Shi, Cuiqin Yu, Sue Wen, Siwan Sha, Bingxian Xu, Xianghuai Yu, Li A comparative study on the value of lower airway exhaled nitric oxide combined with small airway parameters for diagnosing cough-variant asthma |
title | A comparative study on the value of lower airway exhaled nitric oxide combined with small airway parameters for diagnosing cough-variant asthma |
title_full | A comparative study on the value of lower airway exhaled nitric oxide combined with small airway parameters for diagnosing cough-variant asthma |
title_fullStr | A comparative study on the value of lower airway exhaled nitric oxide combined with small airway parameters for diagnosing cough-variant asthma |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative study on the value of lower airway exhaled nitric oxide combined with small airway parameters for diagnosing cough-variant asthma |
title_short | A comparative study on the value of lower airway exhaled nitric oxide combined with small airway parameters for diagnosing cough-variant asthma |
title_sort | comparative study on the value of lower airway exhaled nitric oxide combined with small airway parameters for diagnosing cough-variant asthma |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10278400/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37326344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17534666231181259 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baihaodong acomparativestudyonthevalueoflowerairwayexhalednitricoxidecombinedwithsmallairwayparametersfordiagnosingcoughvariantasthma AT shicuiqin acomparativestudyonthevalueoflowerairwayexhalednitricoxidecombinedwithsmallairwayparametersfordiagnosingcoughvariantasthma AT yusue acomparativestudyonthevalueoflowerairwayexhalednitricoxidecombinedwithsmallairwayparametersfordiagnosingcoughvariantasthma AT wensiwan acomparativestudyonthevalueoflowerairwayexhalednitricoxidecombinedwithsmallairwayparametersfordiagnosingcoughvariantasthma AT shabingxian acomparativestudyonthevalueoflowerairwayexhalednitricoxidecombinedwithsmallairwayparametersfordiagnosingcoughvariantasthma AT xuxianghuai acomparativestudyonthevalueoflowerairwayexhalednitricoxidecombinedwithsmallairwayparametersfordiagnosingcoughvariantasthma AT yuli acomparativestudyonthevalueoflowerairwayexhalednitricoxidecombinedwithsmallairwayparametersfordiagnosingcoughvariantasthma AT baihaodong comparativestudyonthevalueoflowerairwayexhalednitricoxidecombinedwithsmallairwayparametersfordiagnosingcoughvariantasthma AT shicuiqin comparativestudyonthevalueoflowerairwayexhalednitricoxidecombinedwithsmallairwayparametersfordiagnosingcoughvariantasthma AT yusue comparativestudyonthevalueoflowerairwayexhalednitricoxidecombinedwithsmallairwayparametersfordiagnosingcoughvariantasthma AT wensiwan comparativestudyonthevalueoflowerairwayexhalednitricoxidecombinedwithsmallairwayparametersfordiagnosingcoughvariantasthma AT shabingxian comparativestudyonthevalueoflowerairwayexhalednitricoxidecombinedwithsmallairwayparametersfordiagnosingcoughvariantasthma AT xuxianghuai comparativestudyonthevalueoflowerairwayexhalednitricoxidecombinedwithsmallairwayparametersfordiagnosingcoughvariantasthma AT yuli comparativestudyonthevalueoflowerairwayexhalednitricoxidecombinedwithsmallairwayparametersfordiagnosingcoughvariantasthma |