Cargando…
Co-infections of major tick-borne pathogens of dogs in Andhra Pradesh, South India
Implementing hemoprotozoan control strategies in dogs has become difficult because of the co-infections. A multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was carried out for simultaneous detection of the co-infections of Babesia gibsoni, B. vogeli, Hepatozoon canis and Ehrlichia canis from dogs (N = 442)...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Urmia University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10278907/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37342292 http://dx.doi.org/10.30466/vrf.2022.546812.3351 |
_version_ | 1785060565364768768 |
---|---|
author | Kopparthi, Jalajakshi Chennuru, Sreedevi Rayulu Vukka, Chengalva Nalini Kumari, Karumuri Rani Prameela, Devalam |
author_facet | Kopparthi, Jalajakshi Chennuru, Sreedevi Rayulu Vukka, Chengalva Nalini Kumari, Karumuri Rani Prameela, Devalam |
author_sort | Kopparthi, Jalajakshi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Implementing hemoprotozoan control strategies in dogs has become difficult because of the co-infections. A multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was carried out for simultaneous detection of the co-infections of Babesia gibsoni, B. vogeli, Hepatozoon canis and Ehrlichia canis from dogs (N = 442) in Andhra Pradesh, South India. The co-infection combinations were classified as (i) B. gibsoni + B. vogeli + E. canis + H. canis (BEH), (ii) B. gibsoni + B. vogeli + E. canis (BE), (iii) B. gibsoni + B. vogeli + H. canis (BH) and (iv) E. canis + H. canis (EH) groups. The parasite-specific multiplex PCR amplified 18S rRNA gene of B. gibsoni, B. vogeli and H. canis and VirB9 gene of E. canis. The age, gender, breed, medium, living condition and region of dogs were studied as risk factors for co-infections using logistic regression model. Among the co-infections, the incidence was 1.81%, 9.28%, 0.69% and 0.90% for BEH, BE, BH and EH infections, respectively. Young age (< one year), females, mongrels, rural dogs, kennel dogs and presence of ticks were the identified risk factors for overall prevalence of tick-borne pathogens. The incidence of infection was less in rainy season, especially in dogs with a previous acaricidal treatment. The study concludes that the multiplex PCR assay could simultaneously detect natural co-infections in dogs, emphasizing the need for the assay in epidemiological studies to reveal the real pattern of pathogens and select pathogen-specific treatment protocols. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10278907 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Urmia University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102789072023-06-20 Co-infections of major tick-borne pathogens of dogs in Andhra Pradesh, South India Kopparthi, Jalajakshi Chennuru, Sreedevi Rayulu Vukka, Chengalva Nalini Kumari, Karumuri Rani Prameela, Devalam Vet Res Forum Short Communication Implementing hemoprotozoan control strategies in dogs has become difficult because of the co-infections. A multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was carried out for simultaneous detection of the co-infections of Babesia gibsoni, B. vogeli, Hepatozoon canis and Ehrlichia canis from dogs (N = 442) in Andhra Pradesh, South India. The co-infection combinations were classified as (i) B. gibsoni + B. vogeli + E. canis + H. canis (BEH), (ii) B. gibsoni + B. vogeli + E. canis (BE), (iii) B. gibsoni + B. vogeli + H. canis (BH) and (iv) E. canis + H. canis (EH) groups. The parasite-specific multiplex PCR amplified 18S rRNA gene of B. gibsoni, B. vogeli and H. canis and VirB9 gene of E. canis. The age, gender, breed, medium, living condition and region of dogs were studied as risk factors for co-infections using logistic regression model. Among the co-infections, the incidence was 1.81%, 9.28%, 0.69% and 0.90% for BEH, BE, BH and EH infections, respectively. Young age (< one year), females, mongrels, rural dogs, kennel dogs and presence of ticks were the identified risk factors for overall prevalence of tick-borne pathogens. The incidence of infection was less in rainy season, especially in dogs with a previous acaricidal treatment. The study concludes that the multiplex PCR assay could simultaneously detect natural co-infections in dogs, emphasizing the need for the assay in epidemiological studies to reveal the real pattern of pathogens and select pathogen-specific treatment protocols. Urmia University Press 2023 2023-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10278907/ /pubmed/37342292 http://dx.doi.org/10.30466/vrf.2022.546812.3351 Text en © 2023 Urmia University. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Short Communication Kopparthi, Jalajakshi Chennuru, Sreedevi Rayulu Vukka, Chengalva Nalini Kumari, Karumuri Rani Prameela, Devalam Co-infections of major tick-borne pathogens of dogs in Andhra Pradesh, South India |
title | Co-infections of major tick-borne pathogens of dogs in Andhra Pradesh, South India |
title_full | Co-infections of major tick-borne pathogens of dogs in Andhra Pradesh, South India |
title_fullStr | Co-infections of major tick-borne pathogens of dogs in Andhra Pradesh, South India |
title_full_unstemmed | Co-infections of major tick-borne pathogens of dogs in Andhra Pradesh, South India |
title_short | Co-infections of major tick-borne pathogens of dogs in Andhra Pradesh, South India |
title_sort | co-infections of major tick-borne pathogens of dogs in andhra pradesh, south india |
topic | Short Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10278907/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37342292 http://dx.doi.org/10.30466/vrf.2022.546812.3351 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kopparthijalajakshi coinfectionsofmajortickbornepathogensofdogsinandhrapradeshsouthindia AT chennurusreedevi coinfectionsofmajortickbornepathogensofdogsinandhrapradeshsouthindia AT rayuluvukkachengalva coinfectionsofmajortickbornepathogensofdogsinandhrapradeshsouthindia AT nalinikumarikarumuri coinfectionsofmajortickbornepathogensofdogsinandhrapradeshsouthindia AT raniprameeladevalam coinfectionsofmajortickbornepathogensofdogsinandhrapradeshsouthindia |