Cargando…

Co-infections of major tick-borne pathogens of dogs in Andhra Pradesh, South India

Implementing hemoprotozoan control strategies in dogs has become difficult because of the co-infections. A multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was carried out for simultaneous detection of the co-infections of Babesia gibsoni, B. vogeli, Hepatozoon canis and Ehrlichia canis from dogs (N = 442)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kopparthi, Jalajakshi, Chennuru, Sreedevi, Rayulu Vukka, Chengalva, Nalini Kumari, Karumuri, Rani Prameela, Devalam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Urmia University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10278907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37342292
http://dx.doi.org/10.30466/vrf.2022.546812.3351
_version_ 1785060565364768768
author Kopparthi, Jalajakshi
Chennuru, Sreedevi
Rayulu Vukka, Chengalva
Nalini Kumari, Karumuri
Rani Prameela, Devalam
author_facet Kopparthi, Jalajakshi
Chennuru, Sreedevi
Rayulu Vukka, Chengalva
Nalini Kumari, Karumuri
Rani Prameela, Devalam
author_sort Kopparthi, Jalajakshi
collection PubMed
description Implementing hemoprotozoan control strategies in dogs has become difficult because of the co-infections. A multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was carried out for simultaneous detection of the co-infections of Babesia gibsoni, B. vogeli, Hepatozoon canis and Ehrlichia canis from dogs (N = 442) in Andhra Pradesh, South India. The co-infection combinations were classified as (i) B. gibsoni + B. vogeli + E. canis + H. canis (BEH), (ii) B. gibsoni + B. vogeli + E. canis (BE), (iii) B. gibsoni + B. vogeli + H. canis (BH) and (iv) E. canis + H. canis (EH) groups. The parasite-specific multiplex PCR amplified 18S rRNA gene of B. gibsoni, B. vogeli and H. canis and VirB9 gene of E. canis. The age, gender, breed, medium, living condition and region of dogs were studied as risk factors for co-infections using logistic regression model. Among the co-infections, the incidence was 1.81%, 9.28%, 0.69% and 0.90% for BEH, BE, BH and EH infections, respectively. Young age (< one year), females, mongrels, rural dogs, kennel dogs and presence of ticks were the identified risk factors for overall prevalence of tick-borne pathogens. The incidence of infection was less in rainy season, especially in dogs with a previous acaricidal treatment. The study concludes that the multiplex PCR assay could simultaneously detect natural co-infections in dogs, emphasizing the need for the assay in epidemiological studies to reveal the real pattern of pathogens and select pathogen-specific treatment protocols.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10278907
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Urmia University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102789072023-06-20 Co-infections of major tick-borne pathogens of dogs in Andhra Pradesh, South India Kopparthi, Jalajakshi Chennuru, Sreedevi Rayulu Vukka, Chengalva Nalini Kumari, Karumuri Rani Prameela, Devalam Vet Res Forum Short Communication Implementing hemoprotozoan control strategies in dogs has become difficult because of the co-infections. A multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was carried out for simultaneous detection of the co-infections of Babesia gibsoni, B. vogeli, Hepatozoon canis and Ehrlichia canis from dogs (N = 442) in Andhra Pradesh, South India. The co-infection combinations were classified as (i) B. gibsoni + B. vogeli + E. canis + H. canis (BEH), (ii) B. gibsoni + B. vogeli + E. canis (BE), (iii) B. gibsoni + B. vogeli + H. canis (BH) and (iv) E. canis + H. canis (EH) groups. The parasite-specific multiplex PCR amplified 18S rRNA gene of B. gibsoni, B. vogeli and H. canis and VirB9 gene of E. canis. The age, gender, breed, medium, living condition and region of dogs were studied as risk factors for co-infections using logistic regression model. Among the co-infections, the incidence was 1.81%, 9.28%, 0.69% and 0.90% for BEH, BE, BH and EH infections, respectively. Young age (< one year), females, mongrels, rural dogs, kennel dogs and presence of ticks were the identified risk factors for overall prevalence of tick-borne pathogens. The incidence of infection was less in rainy season, especially in dogs with a previous acaricidal treatment. The study concludes that the multiplex PCR assay could simultaneously detect natural co-infections in dogs, emphasizing the need for the assay in epidemiological studies to reveal the real pattern of pathogens and select pathogen-specific treatment protocols. Urmia University Press 2023 2023-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10278907/ /pubmed/37342292 http://dx.doi.org/10.30466/vrf.2022.546812.3351 Text en © 2023 Urmia University. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
spellingShingle Short Communication
Kopparthi, Jalajakshi
Chennuru, Sreedevi
Rayulu Vukka, Chengalva
Nalini Kumari, Karumuri
Rani Prameela, Devalam
Co-infections of major tick-borne pathogens of dogs in Andhra Pradesh, South India
title Co-infections of major tick-borne pathogens of dogs in Andhra Pradesh, South India
title_full Co-infections of major tick-borne pathogens of dogs in Andhra Pradesh, South India
title_fullStr Co-infections of major tick-borne pathogens of dogs in Andhra Pradesh, South India
title_full_unstemmed Co-infections of major tick-borne pathogens of dogs in Andhra Pradesh, South India
title_short Co-infections of major tick-borne pathogens of dogs in Andhra Pradesh, South India
title_sort co-infections of major tick-borne pathogens of dogs in andhra pradesh, south india
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10278907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37342292
http://dx.doi.org/10.30466/vrf.2022.546812.3351
work_keys_str_mv AT kopparthijalajakshi coinfectionsofmajortickbornepathogensofdogsinandhrapradeshsouthindia
AT chennurusreedevi coinfectionsofmajortickbornepathogensofdogsinandhrapradeshsouthindia
AT rayuluvukkachengalva coinfectionsofmajortickbornepathogensofdogsinandhrapradeshsouthindia
AT nalinikumarikarumuri coinfectionsofmajortickbornepathogensofdogsinandhrapradeshsouthindia
AT raniprameeladevalam coinfectionsofmajortickbornepathogensofdogsinandhrapradeshsouthindia