Cargando…

Ovarian stimulation with luteinizing hormone supplementation: the impact of timing on ovarian response and ICSI outcomes

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the timing of rLH addition to rFSH during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) impacts ovarian response and the outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. METHODS: Data of 1278 patients undergoing ICSI between 2015 and 2018, in a private university-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Setti, Amanda, Braga, Daniela, Iaconelli Jr., Assumpto, Borges Jr., Edson
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10279441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36098459
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20220022
_version_ 1785060593192927232
author Setti, Amanda
Braga, Daniela
Iaconelli Jr., Assumpto
Borges Jr., Edson
author_facet Setti, Amanda
Braga, Daniela
Iaconelli Jr., Assumpto
Borges Jr., Edson
author_sort Setti, Amanda
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the timing of rLH addition to rFSH during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) impacts ovarian response and the outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. METHODS: Data of 1278 patients undergoing ICSI between 2015 and 2018, in a private university-affiliated IVF center were analyzed. Patients were divided into groups according to the timing of LH addition to the COS protocol: Group LH-start (n=323), in which LH was administered since day 1 of ovarian stimulation; and Group LH-mid (n=955), in which LH was administered concomitantly with gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist. Data were also stratified according to female age and response to COS. The outcomes of COS and ICSI were compared between the groups. RESULTS: For the general group and in patients aged ≥ 35 years, higher blastocyst development rates were in Group LH-mid compared to Group LH-start. In patients with poor response to COS (POR), higher fertilization rate, blastocyst development rate and implantation rate were observed in Group LH-mid. CONCLUSIONS: rLH supplementation in POR patients may improve laboratorial and clinical outcomes when started in the mid-follicular phase, in GnRH antagonist ICSI cycles.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10279441
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102794412023-06-20 Ovarian stimulation with luteinizing hormone supplementation: the impact of timing on ovarian response and ICSI outcomes Setti, Amanda Braga, Daniela Iaconelli Jr., Assumpto Borges Jr., Edson JBRA Assist Reprod Original Article OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the timing of rLH addition to rFSH during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) impacts ovarian response and the outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. METHODS: Data of 1278 patients undergoing ICSI between 2015 and 2018, in a private university-affiliated IVF center were analyzed. Patients were divided into groups according to the timing of LH addition to the COS protocol: Group LH-start (n=323), in which LH was administered since day 1 of ovarian stimulation; and Group LH-mid (n=955), in which LH was administered concomitantly with gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist. Data were also stratified according to female age and response to COS. The outcomes of COS and ICSI were compared between the groups. RESULTS: For the general group and in patients aged ≥ 35 years, higher blastocyst development rates were in Group LH-mid compared to Group LH-start. In patients with poor response to COS (POR), higher fertilization rate, blastocyst development rate and implantation rate were observed in Group LH-mid. CONCLUSIONS: rLH supplementation in POR patients may improve laboratorial and clinical outcomes when started in the mid-follicular phase, in GnRH antagonist ICSI cycles. Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10279441/ /pubmed/36098459 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20220022 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Setti, Amanda
Braga, Daniela
Iaconelli Jr., Assumpto
Borges Jr., Edson
Ovarian stimulation with luteinizing hormone supplementation: the impact of timing on ovarian response and ICSI outcomes
title Ovarian stimulation with luteinizing hormone supplementation: the impact of timing on ovarian response and ICSI outcomes
title_full Ovarian stimulation with luteinizing hormone supplementation: the impact of timing on ovarian response and ICSI outcomes
title_fullStr Ovarian stimulation with luteinizing hormone supplementation: the impact of timing on ovarian response and ICSI outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Ovarian stimulation with luteinizing hormone supplementation: the impact of timing on ovarian response and ICSI outcomes
title_short Ovarian stimulation with luteinizing hormone supplementation: the impact of timing on ovarian response and ICSI outcomes
title_sort ovarian stimulation with luteinizing hormone supplementation: the impact of timing on ovarian response and icsi outcomes
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10279441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36098459
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20220022
work_keys_str_mv AT settiamanda ovarianstimulationwithluteinizinghormonesupplementationtheimpactoftimingonovarianresponseandicsioutcomes
AT bragadaniela ovarianstimulationwithluteinizinghormonesupplementationtheimpactoftimingonovarianresponseandicsioutcomes
AT iaconellijrassumpto ovarianstimulationwithluteinizinghormonesupplementationtheimpactoftimingonovarianresponseandicsioutcomes
AT borgesjredson ovarianstimulationwithluteinizinghormonesupplementationtheimpactoftimingonovarianresponseandicsioutcomes