Cargando…

Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Minimal Ovarian Stimulation in-vitro Fertilization versus Conventional Ovarian Stimulation in Poor Responders: Economic Evaluation Alongside a Propensity Score Adjusted Prospective Observational Study

OBJECTIVE: Information on the pregnancy rate after successive in-vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles and their associated costs is relevant for couples undergoing assisted reproduction treatments (ARTs). This study, therefore, sought to investigate the effectiveness and the cost-effectiveness of two AR...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	de Souza, Tatiane Oliveira, Ben, Ângela Jornada, van Dongen, Johanna M., Bosmans, Judith E., da Cunha-Filho, João Sabino Lahorgue
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction 2023
Materias:	Original Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10279446/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36107034 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20220025

Ejemplares similares

Comparison of mild ovarian stimulation with conventional ovarian stimulation in poor responders
por: Yoo, Ji Hee, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Luteal phase ovarian stimulation for poor ovarian responders
por: Zhang, Wei, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Ovarian stimulation modalities in poor responders
por: ÖZKAN, Zehra Sema
Publicado: (2019)

Patients undergoing elective and oncofertility preservation respond similarly to controlled ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation
por: Kira, Ariane Tieko Frare, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Effectiveness of corifollitropin alfa used for ovarian stimulation of poor responder patients
por: Selman, Helmy, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

The BISTIM study: a randomized controlled trial comparing dual ovarian stimulation (duostim) with two conventional ovarian stimulations in poor ovarian responders undergoing IVF
por: Massin, N, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The Effect of Dose Adjustments in a Subsequent Cycle of Women With Suboptimal Response Following Conventional Ovarian Stimulation
por: Drakopoulos, Panagiotis, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Freeze-all policy for in vitro fertilization in women with normal response to ovarian stimulation
por: Duarte-Filho, Oscar Barbosa, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Ovarian Fragmentation and AKT Stimulation for Expansion of Fertile Lifespan
por: Vo, Kim Cat Tuyen, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Individualized controlled ovarian stimulation in expected poor-responders: an update
por: Haahr, Thor, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

“Short agonist stop” protocol, an ovarian stimulation for poor responders in in vitro fertilization (IVF): A pilot study
por: Mauries, Charlotte, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The Effect of Follitropin Alfa in Controlled Ovarian Stimulation Protocol for In Vitro Fertilization Cycles
por: Prasetiawati, Novita, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Live Birth Rates in Poor Responders’ Group after Previous Treatment with Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma and Low Dose Ovarian Stimulation Compared with Poor Responders Used Only Low Dose Ovarian Stimulation Before in Vitro Fertilization
por: Stojkovska, Snezhana, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Comparative Effectiveness of Mild or Conventional GnRH-Antagonist Protocols for Ovarian Stimulation in Poor Responders (Poseidon Group 4)
por: Le, Hoang, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

What Is the Best Regimen for Ovarian Stimulation of Poor Responders in ART/IVF?
por: Blumenfeld, Zeev
Publicado: (2020)

Comparative analyses in transcriptome of human granulosa cells and follicular fluid micro-environment between poor ovarian responders with conventional controlled ovarian or mild ovarian stimulations
por: Liu, Xiaoping, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Effects of Repeated Ovarian Stimulation on Ovarian Function and Aging in Mice
por: Whang, Jihye, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Pregnancy Outcomes in Double Stimulation versus Two Consecutive Mild Stimulations for IVF in Poor Ovarian Responders
por: Li, Jingzhe, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Comparison of neonatal outcomes and live-birth defects after progestin-primed ovarian stimulation versus conventional ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: A large retrospective cohort study
por: Wang, Ningling, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Does the Ovarian Stimulation Phase Length Predict In vitro Fertilization Outcomes?
por: Alport, Brie, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Usefulness of random-start progestin-primed ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation
por: Huang, Haipeng, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Luteal phase ovarian stimulation following oocyte retrieval: is it helpful for poor responders?
por: Zhang, John
Publicado: (2015)

Double or dual stimulation in poor ovarian responders: where do we stand?
por: Polat, Mehtap, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Effects of prolonging administration gonadotropin on unexpectedly poor ovarian responders undergoing in vitro fertilization
por: Wei, Zhaolian, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Perifollicular Vascularity in Poor Ovarian Responders in In vitro Fertilization Cycles
por: Majeed, Asifa, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol with or without clomiphene citrate for poor ovarian responders: a retrospective cohort study
por: Liu, Ahui, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Risk of borderline and invasive ovarian tumours after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization in a large Dutch cohort
por: van Leeuwen, F.E., et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Comparative prospective study of 2 ovarian stimulation protocols in poor responders: effect on implantation rate and ongoing pregnancy
por: Merviel, Philippe, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

ANDRO-IVF: a novel protocol for poor responders to IVF controlled ovarian stimulation
por: Bercaire, Ludmila, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Milder is better? advantages and disadvantages of "mild" ovarian stimulation for human in vitro fertilization
por: Revelli, Alberto, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Primary anetoderma in a woman after ovarian stimulations for in vitro fertilization program
por: Bellanca, Salvatore, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Luteal phase stimulation versus follicular phase stimulation in poor ovarian responders: results of a randomized controlled trial
por: Llácer, Joaquín, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Comparison Pregnancy Outcomes Between Minimal Stimulation Protocol and Conventional GnRH Antagonist Protocols in Poor Ovarian Responders
por: Pilehvari, Shamim, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Mild versus conventional ovarian stimulation for IVF in poor, normal and hyper-responders: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Datta, Adrija Kumar, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The Role of Overweight and Obesity in In Vitro Fertilization Outcomes of Poor Ovarian Responders
por: Vural, Fisun, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Anti-mullerian hormone cut-off values for predicting poor ovarian response to exogenous ovarian stimulation in in-vitro fertilization
por: Satwik, Ruma, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Effect of Cetrorelix administration on ovarian stimulation in aged mice
por: Kanda, Akifumi, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Ovarian stimulation for emergency fertility preservation in cancer patients: A case series study
por: Rashidi, Batool Hossein, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Efficiency of metaphase II oocytes following minimal/mild ovarian stimulation in vitro fertilization
por: Zhang, John J., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Impact of letrozole supplementation during ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation in breast cancer patients
por: Sonigo, Charlotte, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_sldge1qk9mgn467cismbt80rd2