Cargando…

An overview of meta-analyses on radiomics: more evidence is needed to support clinical translation

OBJECTIVE: To conduct an overview of meta-analyses of radiomics studies assessing their study quality and evidence level. METHODS: A systematical search was updated via peer-reviewed electronic databases, preprint servers, and systematic review protocol registers until 15 November 2022. Systematic r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhong, Jingyu, Lu, Junjie, Zhang, Guangcheng, Mao, Shiqi, Chen, Haoda, Yin, Qian, Hu, Yangfan, Xing, Yue, Ding, Defang, Ge, Xiang, Zhang, Huan, Yao, Weiwu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10279606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37336830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01437-2
_version_ 1785060623858532352
author Zhong, Jingyu
Lu, Junjie
Zhang, Guangcheng
Mao, Shiqi
Chen, Haoda
Yin, Qian
Hu, Yangfan
Xing, Yue
Ding, Defang
Ge, Xiang
Zhang, Huan
Yao, Weiwu
author_facet Zhong, Jingyu
Lu, Junjie
Zhang, Guangcheng
Mao, Shiqi
Chen, Haoda
Yin, Qian
Hu, Yangfan
Xing, Yue
Ding, Defang
Ge, Xiang
Zhang, Huan
Yao, Weiwu
author_sort Zhong, Jingyu
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To conduct an overview of meta-analyses of radiomics studies assessing their study quality and evidence level. METHODS: A systematical search was updated via peer-reviewed electronic databases, preprint servers, and systematic review protocol registers until 15 November 2022. Systematic reviews with meta-analysis of primary radiomics studies were included. Their reporting transparency, methodological quality, and risk of bias were assessed by PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 checklist, AMSTAR-2 (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews, version 2) tool, and ROBIS (Risk Of Bias In Systematic reviews) tool, respectively. The evidence level supporting the radiomics for clinical use was rated. RESULTS: We identified 44 systematic reviews with meta-analyses on radiomics research. The mean ± standard deviation of PRISMA adherence rate was 65 ± 9%. The AMSTAR-2 tool rated 5 and 39 systematic reviews as low and critically low confidence, respectively. The ROBIS assessment resulted low, unclear and high risk in 5, 11, and 28 systematic reviews, respectively. We reperformed 53 meta-analyses in 38 included systematic reviews. There were 3, 7, and 43 meta-analyses rated as convincing, highly suggestive, and weak levels of evidence, respectively. The convincing level of evidence was rated in (1) T2-FLAIR radiomics for IDH-mutant vs IDH-wide type differentiation in low-grade glioma, (2) CT radiomics for COVID-19 vs other viral pneumonia differentiation, and (3) MRI radiomics for high-grade glioma vs brain metastasis differentiation. CONCLUSIONS: The systematic reviews on radiomics were with suboptimal quality. A limited number of radiomics approaches were supported by convincing level of evidence. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The evidence supporting the clinical application of radiomics are insufficient, calling for researches translating radiomics from an academic tool to a practicable adjunct towards clinical deployment. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13244-023-01437-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10279606
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Vienna
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102796062023-06-21 An overview of meta-analyses on radiomics: more evidence is needed to support clinical translation Zhong, Jingyu Lu, Junjie Zhang, Guangcheng Mao, Shiqi Chen, Haoda Yin, Qian Hu, Yangfan Xing, Yue Ding, Defang Ge, Xiang Zhang, Huan Yao, Weiwu Insights Imaging Original Article OBJECTIVE: To conduct an overview of meta-analyses of radiomics studies assessing their study quality and evidence level. METHODS: A systematical search was updated via peer-reviewed electronic databases, preprint servers, and systematic review protocol registers until 15 November 2022. Systematic reviews with meta-analysis of primary radiomics studies were included. Their reporting transparency, methodological quality, and risk of bias were assessed by PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 checklist, AMSTAR-2 (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews, version 2) tool, and ROBIS (Risk Of Bias In Systematic reviews) tool, respectively. The evidence level supporting the radiomics for clinical use was rated. RESULTS: We identified 44 systematic reviews with meta-analyses on radiomics research. The mean ± standard deviation of PRISMA adherence rate was 65 ± 9%. The AMSTAR-2 tool rated 5 and 39 systematic reviews as low and critically low confidence, respectively. The ROBIS assessment resulted low, unclear and high risk in 5, 11, and 28 systematic reviews, respectively. We reperformed 53 meta-analyses in 38 included systematic reviews. There were 3, 7, and 43 meta-analyses rated as convincing, highly suggestive, and weak levels of evidence, respectively. The convincing level of evidence was rated in (1) T2-FLAIR radiomics for IDH-mutant vs IDH-wide type differentiation in low-grade glioma, (2) CT radiomics for COVID-19 vs other viral pneumonia differentiation, and (3) MRI radiomics for high-grade glioma vs brain metastasis differentiation. CONCLUSIONS: The systematic reviews on radiomics were with suboptimal quality. A limited number of radiomics approaches were supported by convincing level of evidence. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The evidence supporting the clinical application of radiomics are insufficient, calling for researches translating radiomics from an academic tool to a practicable adjunct towards clinical deployment. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13244-023-01437-2. Springer Vienna 2023-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10279606/ /pubmed/37336830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01437-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Zhong, Jingyu
Lu, Junjie
Zhang, Guangcheng
Mao, Shiqi
Chen, Haoda
Yin, Qian
Hu, Yangfan
Xing, Yue
Ding, Defang
Ge, Xiang
Zhang, Huan
Yao, Weiwu
An overview of meta-analyses on radiomics: more evidence is needed to support clinical translation
title An overview of meta-analyses on radiomics: more evidence is needed to support clinical translation
title_full An overview of meta-analyses on radiomics: more evidence is needed to support clinical translation
title_fullStr An overview of meta-analyses on radiomics: more evidence is needed to support clinical translation
title_full_unstemmed An overview of meta-analyses on radiomics: more evidence is needed to support clinical translation
title_short An overview of meta-analyses on radiomics: more evidence is needed to support clinical translation
title_sort overview of meta-analyses on radiomics: more evidence is needed to support clinical translation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10279606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37336830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01437-2
work_keys_str_mv AT zhongjingyu anoverviewofmetaanalysesonradiomicsmoreevidenceisneededtosupportclinicaltranslation
AT lujunjie anoverviewofmetaanalysesonradiomicsmoreevidenceisneededtosupportclinicaltranslation
AT zhangguangcheng anoverviewofmetaanalysesonradiomicsmoreevidenceisneededtosupportclinicaltranslation
AT maoshiqi anoverviewofmetaanalysesonradiomicsmoreevidenceisneededtosupportclinicaltranslation
AT chenhaoda anoverviewofmetaanalysesonradiomicsmoreevidenceisneededtosupportclinicaltranslation
AT yinqian anoverviewofmetaanalysesonradiomicsmoreevidenceisneededtosupportclinicaltranslation
AT huyangfan anoverviewofmetaanalysesonradiomicsmoreevidenceisneededtosupportclinicaltranslation
AT xingyue anoverviewofmetaanalysesonradiomicsmoreevidenceisneededtosupportclinicaltranslation
AT dingdefang anoverviewofmetaanalysesonradiomicsmoreevidenceisneededtosupportclinicaltranslation
AT gexiang anoverviewofmetaanalysesonradiomicsmoreevidenceisneededtosupportclinicaltranslation
AT zhanghuan anoverviewofmetaanalysesonradiomicsmoreevidenceisneededtosupportclinicaltranslation
AT yaoweiwu anoverviewofmetaanalysesonradiomicsmoreevidenceisneededtosupportclinicaltranslation
AT zhongjingyu overviewofmetaanalysesonradiomicsmoreevidenceisneededtosupportclinicaltranslation
AT lujunjie overviewofmetaanalysesonradiomicsmoreevidenceisneededtosupportclinicaltranslation
AT zhangguangcheng overviewofmetaanalysesonradiomicsmoreevidenceisneededtosupportclinicaltranslation
AT maoshiqi overviewofmetaanalysesonradiomicsmoreevidenceisneededtosupportclinicaltranslation
AT chenhaoda overviewofmetaanalysesonradiomicsmoreevidenceisneededtosupportclinicaltranslation
AT yinqian overviewofmetaanalysesonradiomicsmoreevidenceisneededtosupportclinicaltranslation
AT huyangfan overviewofmetaanalysesonradiomicsmoreevidenceisneededtosupportclinicaltranslation
AT xingyue overviewofmetaanalysesonradiomicsmoreevidenceisneededtosupportclinicaltranslation
AT dingdefang overviewofmetaanalysesonradiomicsmoreevidenceisneededtosupportclinicaltranslation
AT gexiang overviewofmetaanalysesonradiomicsmoreevidenceisneededtosupportclinicaltranslation
AT zhanghuan overviewofmetaanalysesonradiomicsmoreevidenceisneededtosupportclinicaltranslation
AT yaoweiwu overviewofmetaanalysesonradiomicsmoreevidenceisneededtosupportclinicaltranslation