Cargando…
An overview of meta-analyses on radiomics: more evidence is needed to support clinical translation
OBJECTIVE: To conduct an overview of meta-analyses of radiomics studies assessing their study quality and evidence level. METHODS: A systematical search was updated via peer-reviewed electronic databases, preprint servers, and systematic review protocol registers until 15 November 2022. Systematic r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Vienna
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10279606/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37336830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01437-2 |
_version_ | 1785060623858532352 |
---|---|
author | Zhong, Jingyu Lu, Junjie Zhang, Guangcheng Mao, Shiqi Chen, Haoda Yin, Qian Hu, Yangfan Xing, Yue Ding, Defang Ge, Xiang Zhang, Huan Yao, Weiwu |
author_facet | Zhong, Jingyu Lu, Junjie Zhang, Guangcheng Mao, Shiqi Chen, Haoda Yin, Qian Hu, Yangfan Xing, Yue Ding, Defang Ge, Xiang Zhang, Huan Yao, Weiwu |
author_sort | Zhong, Jingyu |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To conduct an overview of meta-analyses of radiomics studies assessing their study quality and evidence level. METHODS: A systematical search was updated via peer-reviewed electronic databases, preprint servers, and systematic review protocol registers until 15 November 2022. Systematic reviews with meta-analysis of primary radiomics studies were included. Their reporting transparency, methodological quality, and risk of bias were assessed by PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 checklist, AMSTAR-2 (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews, version 2) tool, and ROBIS (Risk Of Bias In Systematic reviews) tool, respectively. The evidence level supporting the radiomics for clinical use was rated. RESULTS: We identified 44 systematic reviews with meta-analyses on radiomics research. The mean ± standard deviation of PRISMA adherence rate was 65 ± 9%. The AMSTAR-2 tool rated 5 and 39 systematic reviews as low and critically low confidence, respectively. The ROBIS assessment resulted low, unclear and high risk in 5, 11, and 28 systematic reviews, respectively. We reperformed 53 meta-analyses in 38 included systematic reviews. There were 3, 7, and 43 meta-analyses rated as convincing, highly suggestive, and weak levels of evidence, respectively. The convincing level of evidence was rated in (1) T2-FLAIR radiomics for IDH-mutant vs IDH-wide type differentiation in low-grade glioma, (2) CT radiomics for COVID-19 vs other viral pneumonia differentiation, and (3) MRI radiomics for high-grade glioma vs brain metastasis differentiation. CONCLUSIONS: The systematic reviews on radiomics were with suboptimal quality. A limited number of radiomics approaches were supported by convincing level of evidence. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The evidence supporting the clinical application of radiomics are insufficient, calling for researches translating radiomics from an academic tool to a practicable adjunct towards clinical deployment. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13244-023-01437-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10279606 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Vienna |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102796062023-06-21 An overview of meta-analyses on radiomics: more evidence is needed to support clinical translation Zhong, Jingyu Lu, Junjie Zhang, Guangcheng Mao, Shiqi Chen, Haoda Yin, Qian Hu, Yangfan Xing, Yue Ding, Defang Ge, Xiang Zhang, Huan Yao, Weiwu Insights Imaging Original Article OBJECTIVE: To conduct an overview of meta-analyses of radiomics studies assessing their study quality and evidence level. METHODS: A systematical search was updated via peer-reviewed electronic databases, preprint servers, and systematic review protocol registers until 15 November 2022. Systematic reviews with meta-analysis of primary radiomics studies were included. Their reporting transparency, methodological quality, and risk of bias were assessed by PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 checklist, AMSTAR-2 (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews, version 2) tool, and ROBIS (Risk Of Bias In Systematic reviews) tool, respectively. The evidence level supporting the radiomics for clinical use was rated. RESULTS: We identified 44 systematic reviews with meta-analyses on radiomics research. The mean ± standard deviation of PRISMA adherence rate was 65 ± 9%. The AMSTAR-2 tool rated 5 and 39 systematic reviews as low and critically low confidence, respectively. The ROBIS assessment resulted low, unclear and high risk in 5, 11, and 28 systematic reviews, respectively. We reperformed 53 meta-analyses in 38 included systematic reviews. There were 3, 7, and 43 meta-analyses rated as convincing, highly suggestive, and weak levels of evidence, respectively. The convincing level of evidence was rated in (1) T2-FLAIR radiomics for IDH-mutant vs IDH-wide type differentiation in low-grade glioma, (2) CT radiomics for COVID-19 vs other viral pneumonia differentiation, and (3) MRI radiomics for high-grade glioma vs brain metastasis differentiation. CONCLUSIONS: The systematic reviews on radiomics were with suboptimal quality. A limited number of radiomics approaches were supported by convincing level of evidence. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The evidence supporting the clinical application of radiomics are insufficient, calling for researches translating radiomics from an academic tool to a practicable adjunct towards clinical deployment. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13244-023-01437-2. Springer Vienna 2023-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10279606/ /pubmed/37336830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01437-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Zhong, Jingyu Lu, Junjie Zhang, Guangcheng Mao, Shiqi Chen, Haoda Yin, Qian Hu, Yangfan Xing, Yue Ding, Defang Ge, Xiang Zhang, Huan Yao, Weiwu An overview of meta-analyses on radiomics: more evidence is needed to support clinical translation |
title | An overview of meta-analyses on radiomics: more evidence is needed to support clinical translation |
title_full | An overview of meta-analyses on radiomics: more evidence is needed to support clinical translation |
title_fullStr | An overview of meta-analyses on radiomics: more evidence is needed to support clinical translation |
title_full_unstemmed | An overview of meta-analyses on radiomics: more evidence is needed to support clinical translation |
title_short | An overview of meta-analyses on radiomics: more evidence is needed to support clinical translation |
title_sort | overview of meta-analyses on radiomics: more evidence is needed to support clinical translation |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10279606/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37336830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01437-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhongjingyu anoverviewofmetaanalysesonradiomicsmoreevidenceisneededtosupportclinicaltranslation AT lujunjie anoverviewofmetaanalysesonradiomicsmoreevidenceisneededtosupportclinicaltranslation AT zhangguangcheng anoverviewofmetaanalysesonradiomicsmoreevidenceisneededtosupportclinicaltranslation AT maoshiqi anoverviewofmetaanalysesonradiomicsmoreevidenceisneededtosupportclinicaltranslation AT chenhaoda anoverviewofmetaanalysesonradiomicsmoreevidenceisneededtosupportclinicaltranslation AT yinqian anoverviewofmetaanalysesonradiomicsmoreevidenceisneededtosupportclinicaltranslation AT huyangfan anoverviewofmetaanalysesonradiomicsmoreevidenceisneededtosupportclinicaltranslation AT xingyue anoverviewofmetaanalysesonradiomicsmoreevidenceisneededtosupportclinicaltranslation AT dingdefang anoverviewofmetaanalysesonradiomicsmoreevidenceisneededtosupportclinicaltranslation AT gexiang anoverviewofmetaanalysesonradiomicsmoreevidenceisneededtosupportclinicaltranslation AT zhanghuan anoverviewofmetaanalysesonradiomicsmoreevidenceisneededtosupportclinicaltranslation AT yaoweiwu anoverviewofmetaanalysesonradiomicsmoreevidenceisneededtosupportclinicaltranslation AT zhongjingyu overviewofmetaanalysesonradiomicsmoreevidenceisneededtosupportclinicaltranslation AT lujunjie overviewofmetaanalysesonradiomicsmoreevidenceisneededtosupportclinicaltranslation AT zhangguangcheng overviewofmetaanalysesonradiomicsmoreevidenceisneededtosupportclinicaltranslation AT maoshiqi overviewofmetaanalysesonradiomicsmoreevidenceisneededtosupportclinicaltranslation AT chenhaoda overviewofmetaanalysesonradiomicsmoreevidenceisneededtosupportclinicaltranslation AT yinqian overviewofmetaanalysesonradiomicsmoreevidenceisneededtosupportclinicaltranslation AT huyangfan overviewofmetaanalysesonradiomicsmoreevidenceisneededtosupportclinicaltranslation AT xingyue overviewofmetaanalysesonradiomicsmoreevidenceisneededtosupportclinicaltranslation AT dingdefang overviewofmetaanalysesonradiomicsmoreevidenceisneededtosupportclinicaltranslation AT gexiang overviewofmetaanalysesonradiomicsmoreevidenceisneededtosupportclinicaltranslation AT zhanghuan overviewofmetaanalysesonradiomicsmoreevidenceisneededtosupportclinicaltranslation AT yaoweiwu overviewofmetaanalysesonradiomicsmoreevidenceisneededtosupportclinicaltranslation |