Cargando…

A systematic review on predicting PV system parameters using machine learning

Due to the growing demand, assessing performance has become obligatory for photovoltaic (PV) energy harvesting systems. Performance assessment involves estimating different PV system parameters. Traditional ways, such as calculating solar radiation using satellite data and the IV characteristics app...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jobayer, Md, Shaikat, Md Al Hasan, Naimur Rashid, Md, Hasan, Md Rakibul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10279818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37346325
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16815
_version_ 1785060670045159424
author Jobayer, Md
Shaikat, Md Al Hasan
Naimur Rashid, Md
Hasan, Md Rakibul
author_facet Jobayer, Md
Shaikat, Md Al Hasan
Naimur Rashid, Md
Hasan, Md Rakibul
author_sort Jobayer, Md
collection PubMed
description Due to the growing demand, assessing performance has become obligatory for photovoltaic (PV) energy harvesting systems. Performance assessment involves estimating different PV system parameters. Traditional ways, such as calculating solar radiation using satellite data and the IV characteristics approach as assessment methods, are no longer reliable enough to provide a reasonable projection of PV system parameters. Estimating system parameters using machine learning (ML) approaches has become a reliable and popular method because of its speed and accuracy. This paper systematically reviewed ML-based PV parameter estimation studies published in the last three years (2020 – 2022). Studies were analyzed using several criteria, including ML algorithm, outcome, experimental setup, sample data size, and error metric. The analysis revealed several interesting factors. The neural network was the most popular ML method (32.55%), followed by random vector functional link (13.95%) and support vector machine (9.30%). Dataset was sourced from hardware tests and computer-based simulations: 66% of the studies used data from only computer simulation, 18% used data from only hardware setup, and the 16% experiments used data from both hardware and simulations to evaluate different system parameters. The top three most commonly used error metrics were root mean square error (29.1%), mean absolute error (17.5%), and coefficient of determination (15.9%). Our systematic review will help researchers assess ML algorithms' projection in PV system parameters estimation. Consequently, scopes shall be created to establish more robust governmental frameworks, expand private financing in the PV industry, and optimize PV system parameters.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10279818
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102798182023-06-21 A systematic review on predicting PV system parameters using machine learning Jobayer, Md Shaikat, Md Al Hasan Naimur Rashid, Md Hasan, Md Rakibul Heliyon Review Article Due to the growing demand, assessing performance has become obligatory for photovoltaic (PV) energy harvesting systems. Performance assessment involves estimating different PV system parameters. Traditional ways, such as calculating solar radiation using satellite data and the IV characteristics approach as assessment methods, are no longer reliable enough to provide a reasonable projection of PV system parameters. Estimating system parameters using machine learning (ML) approaches has become a reliable and popular method because of its speed and accuracy. This paper systematically reviewed ML-based PV parameter estimation studies published in the last three years (2020 – 2022). Studies were analyzed using several criteria, including ML algorithm, outcome, experimental setup, sample data size, and error metric. The analysis revealed several interesting factors. The neural network was the most popular ML method (32.55%), followed by random vector functional link (13.95%) and support vector machine (9.30%). Dataset was sourced from hardware tests and computer-based simulations: 66% of the studies used data from only computer simulation, 18% used data from only hardware setup, and the 16% experiments used data from both hardware and simulations to evaluate different system parameters. The top three most commonly used error metrics were root mean square error (29.1%), mean absolute error (17.5%), and coefficient of determination (15.9%). Our systematic review will help researchers assess ML algorithms' projection in PV system parameters estimation. Consequently, scopes shall be created to establish more robust governmental frameworks, expand private financing in the PV industry, and optimize PV system parameters. Elsevier 2023-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10279818/ /pubmed/37346325 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16815 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review Article
Jobayer, Md
Shaikat, Md Al Hasan
Naimur Rashid, Md
Hasan, Md Rakibul
A systematic review on predicting PV system parameters using machine learning
title A systematic review on predicting PV system parameters using machine learning
title_full A systematic review on predicting PV system parameters using machine learning
title_fullStr A systematic review on predicting PV system parameters using machine learning
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review on predicting PV system parameters using machine learning
title_short A systematic review on predicting PV system parameters using machine learning
title_sort systematic review on predicting pv system parameters using machine learning
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10279818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37346325
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16815
work_keys_str_mv AT jobayermd asystematicreviewonpredictingpvsystemparametersusingmachinelearning
AT shaikatmdalhasan asystematicreviewonpredictingpvsystemparametersusingmachinelearning
AT naimurrashidmd asystematicreviewonpredictingpvsystemparametersusingmachinelearning
AT hasanmdrakibul asystematicreviewonpredictingpvsystemparametersusingmachinelearning
AT jobayermd systematicreviewonpredictingpvsystemparametersusingmachinelearning
AT shaikatmdalhasan systematicreviewonpredictingpvsystemparametersusingmachinelearning
AT naimurrashidmd systematicreviewonpredictingpvsystemparametersusingmachinelearning
AT hasanmdrakibul systematicreviewonpredictingpvsystemparametersusingmachinelearning