Cargando…
A scoping review of the evidence for the impact of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions on shift work related sleep disturbance in an occupational setting
Background: Shift work is essential in society but can be detrimental to health and quality of life and is associated with decreased productivity and increased risk of accidents. Interventions to reduce these consequences are needed, but the extent and range of trial evidence for interventions for t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
F1000 Research Limited
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10280030/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37346814 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17002.2 |
_version_ | 1785060717589692416 |
---|---|
author | Conway-Jones, Rebecca Dunlop, Ella Kyle, Simon Ray, David Roberts, Nia Farmer, Andrew |
author_facet | Conway-Jones, Rebecca Dunlop, Ella Kyle, Simon Ray, David Roberts, Nia Farmer, Andrew |
author_sort | Conway-Jones, Rebecca |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Shift work is essential in society but can be detrimental to health and quality of life and is associated with decreased productivity and increased risk of accidents. Interventions to reduce these consequences are needed, but the extent and range of trial evidence for interventions for those most affected by their shift-work schedules is unclear. We therefore carried out a scoping review to assess the availability of evidence to inform the development and evaluation of future interventions. Methods: We aimed to identify clinical trials of any intervention for shift work-related sleep disturbance that included a comparator group, where the intervention was delivered in an occupational setting. We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CINAHL, EMBASE, Medline and Science Citation Index from inception to 30 (th) March 2020 for relevant citations. Citations were screened by two independent reviewers, a third reviewer resolved disagreements. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers. Results: From 1250 unique citations, 14 studies met inclusion criteria for comparative trials of treatment in an occupational setting. There were five trials of hypnotics, five trials of stimulants, and four trials of non-pharmacological therapies (cognitive behavioural therapy, light therapy, aromatherapy and herbal medicine). Outcomes included sleep parameters, day-time sleepiness, and quality of life. There were no consistently reported outcomes across trials. Conclusions: Interventions fell into three distinct groups investigated in distinct time periods without progression from efficacy trials to wider-scale interventions. The lack of consistent patient-reported outcome measures limits synthesising findings. Some trials focussed on optimising sleep, others on reducing wake-time sleepiness. Adequately powered trials of existing interventions are needed, with the development and testing of novel combination treatments in patients with well-defined shift work sleep disorder. A core set of clinically relevant outcomes will develop and standardise the evidence-base for shift work sleep disorder. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10280030 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | F1000 Research Limited |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102800302023-06-21 A scoping review of the evidence for the impact of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions on shift work related sleep disturbance in an occupational setting Conway-Jones, Rebecca Dunlop, Ella Kyle, Simon Ray, David Roberts, Nia Farmer, Andrew Wellcome Open Res Systematic Review Background: Shift work is essential in society but can be detrimental to health and quality of life and is associated with decreased productivity and increased risk of accidents. Interventions to reduce these consequences are needed, but the extent and range of trial evidence for interventions for those most affected by their shift-work schedules is unclear. We therefore carried out a scoping review to assess the availability of evidence to inform the development and evaluation of future interventions. Methods: We aimed to identify clinical trials of any intervention for shift work-related sleep disturbance that included a comparator group, where the intervention was delivered in an occupational setting. We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CINAHL, EMBASE, Medline and Science Citation Index from inception to 30 (th) March 2020 for relevant citations. Citations were screened by two independent reviewers, a third reviewer resolved disagreements. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers. Results: From 1250 unique citations, 14 studies met inclusion criteria for comparative trials of treatment in an occupational setting. There were five trials of hypnotics, five trials of stimulants, and four trials of non-pharmacological therapies (cognitive behavioural therapy, light therapy, aromatherapy and herbal medicine). Outcomes included sleep parameters, day-time sleepiness, and quality of life. There were no consistently reported outcomes across trials. Conclusions: Interventions fell into three distinct groups investigated in distinct time periods without progression from efficacy trials to wider-scale interventions. The lack of consistent patient-reported outcome measures limits synthesising findings. Some trials focussed on optimising sleep, others on reducing wake-time sleepiness. Adequately powered trials of existing interventions are needed, with the development and testing of novel combination treatments in patients with well-defined shift work sleep disorder. A core set of clinically relevant outcomes will develop and standardise the evidence-base for shift work sleep disorder. F1000 Research Limited 2023-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10280030/ /pubmed/37346814 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17002.2 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Conway-Jones R et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Conway-Jones, Rebecca Dunlop, Ella Kyle, Simon Ray, David Roberts, Nia Farmer, Andrew A scoping review of the evidence for the impact of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions on shift work related sleep disturbance in an occupational setting |
title | A scoping review of the evidence for the impact of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions on shift work related sleep disturbance in an occupational setting |
title_full | A scoping review of the evidence for the impact of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions on shift work related sleep disturbance in an occupational setting |
title_fullStr | A scoping review of the evidence for the impact of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions on shift work related sleep disturbance in an occupational setting |
title_full_unstemmed | A scoping review of the evidence for the impact of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions on shift work related sleep disturbance in an occupational setting |
title_short | A scoping review of the evidence for the impact of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions on shift work related sleep disturbance in an occupational setting |
title_sort | scoping review of the evidence for the impact of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions on shift work related sleep disturbance in an occupational setting |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10280030/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37346814 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17002.2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT conwayjonesrebecca ascopingreviewoftheevidencefortheimpactofpharmacologicalandnonpharmacologicalinterventionsonshiftworkrelatedsleepdisturbanceinanoccupationalsetting AT dunlopella ascopingreviewoftheevidencefortheimpactofpharmacologicalandnonpharmacologicalinterventionsonshiftworkrelatedsleepdisturbanceinanoccupationalsetting AT kylesimon ascopingreviewoftheevidencefortheimpactofpharmacologicalandnonpharmacologicalinterventionsonshiftworkrelatedsleepdisturbanceinanoccupationalsetting AT raydavid ascopingreviewoftheevidencefortheimpactofpharmacologicalandnonpharmacologicalinterventionsonshiftworkrelatedsleepdisturbanceinanoccupationalsetting AT robertsnia ascopingreviewoftheevidencefortheimpactofpharmacologicalandnonpharmacologicalinterventionsonshiftworkrelatedsleepdisturbanceinanoccupationalsetting AT farmerandrew ascopingreviewoftheevidencefortheimpactofpharmacologicalandnonpharmacologicalinterventionsonshiftworkrelatedsleepdisturbanceinanoccupationalsetting AT conwayjonesrebecca scopingreviewoftheevidencefortheimpactofpharmacologicalandnonpharmacologicalinterventionsonshiftworkrelatedsleepdisturbanceinanoccupationalsetting AT dunlopella scopingreviewoftheevidencefortheimpactofpharmacologicalandnonpharmacologicalinterventionsonshiftworkrelatedsleepdisturbanceinanoccupationalsetting AT kylesimon scopingreviewoftheevidencefortheimpactofpharmacologicalandnonpharmacologicalinterventionsonshiftworkrelatedsleepdisturbanceinanoccupationalsetting AT raydavid scopingreviewoftheevidencefortheimpactofpharmacologicalandnonpharmacologicalinterventionsonshiftworkrelatedsleepdisturbanceinanoccupationalsetting AT robertsnia scopingreviewoftheevidencefortheimpactofpharmacologicalandnonpharmacologicalinterventionsonshiftworkrelatedsleepdisturbanceinanoccupationalsetting AT farmerandrew scopingreviewoftheevidencefortheimpactofpharmacologicalandnonpharmacologicalinterventionsonshiftworkrelatedsleepdisturbanceinanoccupationalsetting |