Cargando…

A scoping review of the evidence for the impact of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions on shift work related sleep disturbance in an occupational setting

Background: Shift work is essential in society but can be detrimental to health and quality of life and is associated with decreased productivity and increased risk of accidents. Interventions to reduce these consequences are needed, but the extent and range of trial evidence for interventions for t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Conway-Jones, Rebecca, Dunlop, Ella, Kyle, Simon, Ray, David, Roberts, Nia, Farmer, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10280030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37346814
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17002.2
_version_ 1785060717589692416
author Conway-Jones, Rebecca
Dunlop, Ella
Kyle, Simon
Ray, David
Roberts, Nia
Farmer, Andrew
author_facet Conway-Jones, Rebecca
Dunlop, Ella
Kyle, Simon
Ray, David
Roberts, Nia
Farmer, Andrew
author_sort Conway-Jones, Rebecca
collection PubMed
description Background: Shift work is essential in society but can be detrimental to health and quality of life and is associated with decreased productivity and increased risk of accidents. Interventions to reduce these consequences are needed, but the extent and range of trial evidence for interventions for those most affected by their shift-work schedules is unclear. We therefore carried out a scoping review to assess the availability of evidence to inform the development and evaluation of future interventions. Methods: We aimed to identify clinical trials of any intervention for shift work-related sleep disturbance that included a comparator group, where the intervention was delivered in an occupational setting. We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CINAHL, EMBASE, Medline and Science Citation Index from inception to 30 (th) March 2020 for relevant citations. Citations were screened by two independent reviewers, a third reviewer resolved disagreements. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers. Results: From 1250 unique citations, 14 studies met inclusion criteria for comparative trials of treatment in an occupational setting. There were five trials of hypnotics, five trials of stimulants, and four trials of non-pharmacological therapies (cognitive behavioural therapy, light therapy, aromatherapy and herbal medicine). Outcomes included sleep parameters, day-time sleepiness, and quality of life. There were no consistently reported outcomes across trials. Conclusions: Interventions fell into three distinct groups investigated in distinct time periods without progression from efficacy trials to wider-scale interventions. The lack of consistent patient-reported outcome measures limits synthesising findings. Some trials focussed on optimising sleep, others on reducing wake-time sleepiness. Adequately powered trials of existing interventions are needed, with the development and testing of novel combination treatments in patients with well-defined shift work sleep disorder. A core set of clinically relevant outcomes will develop and standardise the evidence-base for shift work sleep disorder.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10280030
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102800302023-06-21 A scoping review of the evidence for the impact of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions on shift work related sleep disturbance in an occupational setting Conway-Jones, Rebecca Dunlop, Ella Kyle, Simon Ray, David Roberts, Nia Farmer, Andrew Wellcome Open Res Systematic Review Background: Shift work is essential in society but can be detrimental to health and quality of life and is associated with decreased productivity and increased risk of accidents. Interventions to reduce these consequences are needed, but the extent and range of trial evidence for interventions for those most affected by their shift-work schedules is unclear. We therefore carried out a scoping review to assess the availability of evidence to inform the development and evaluation of future interventions. Methods: We aimed to identify clinical trials of any intervention for shift work-related sleep disturbance that included a comparator group, where the intervention was delivered in an occupational setting. We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CINAHL, EMBASE, Medline and Science Citation Index from inception to 30 (th) March 2020 for relevant citations. Citations were screened by two independent reviewers, a third reviewer resolved disagreements. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers. Results: From 1250 unique citations, 14 studies met inclusion criteria for comparative trials of treatment in an occupational setting. There were five trials of hypnotics, five trials of stimulants, and four trials of non-pharmacological therapies (cognitive behavioural therapy, light therapy, aromatherapy and herbal medicine). Outcomes included sleep parameters, day-time sleepiness, and quality of life. There were no consistently reported outcomes across trials. Conclusions: Interventions fell into three distinct groups investigated in distinct time periods without progression from efficacy trials to wider-scale interventions. The lack of consistent patient-reported outcome measures limits synthesising findings. Some trials focussed on optimising sleep, others on reducing wake-time sleepiness. Adequately powered trials of existing interventions are needed, with the development and testing of novel combination treatments in patients with well-defined shift work sleep disorder. A core set of clinically relevant outcomes will develop and standardise the evidence-base for shift work sleep disorder. F1000 Research Limited 2023-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10280030/ /pubmed/37346814 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17002.2 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Conway-Jones R et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Conway-Jones, Rebecca
Dunlop, Ella
Kyle, Simon
Ray, David
Roberts, Nia
Farmer, Andrew
A scoping review of the evidence for the impact of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions on shift work related sleep disturbance in an occupational setting
title A scoping review of the evidence for the impact of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions on shift work related sleep disturbance in an occupational setting
title_full A scoping review of the evidence for the impact of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions on shift work related sleep disturbance in an occupational setting
title_fullStr A scoping review of the evidence for the impact of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions on shift work related sleep disturbance in an occupational setting
title_full_unstemmed A scoping review of the evidence for the impact of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions on shift work related sleep disturbance in an occupational setting
title_short A scoping review of the evidence for the impact of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions on shift work related sleep disturbance in an occupational setting
title_sort scoping review of the evidence for the impact of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions on shift work related sleep disturbance in an occupational setting
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10280030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37346814
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17002.2
work_keys_str_mv AT conwayjonesrebecca ascopingreviewoftheevidencefortheimpactofpharmacologicalandnonpharmacologicalinterventionsonshiftworkrelatedsleepdisturbanceinanoccupationalsetting
AT dunlopella ascopingreviewoftheevidencefortheimpactofpharmacologicalandnonpharmacologicalinterventionsonshiftworkrelatedsleepdisturbanceinanoccupationalsetting
AT kylesimon ascopingreviewoftheevidencefortheimpactofpharmacologicalandnonpharmacologicalinterventionsonshiftworkrelatedsleepdisturbanceinanoccupationalsetting
AT raydavid ascopingreviewoftheevidencefortheimpactofpharmacologicalandnonpharmacologicalinterventionsonshiftworkrelatedsleepdisturbanceinanoccupationalsetting
AT robertsnia ascopingreviewoftheevidencefortheimpactofpharmacologicalandnonpharmacologicalinterventionsonshiftworkrelatedsleepdisturbanceinanoccupationalsetting
AT farmerandrew ascopingreviewoftheevidencefortheimpactofpharmacologicalandnonpharmacologicalinterventionsonshiftworkrelatedsleepdisturbanceinanoccupationalsetting
AT conwayjonesrebecca scopingreviewoftheevidencefortheimpactofpharmacologicalandnonpharmacologicalinterventionsonshiftworkrelatedsleepdisturbanceinanoccupationalsetting
AT dunlopella scopingreviewoftheevidencefortheimpactofpharmacologicalandnonpharmacologicalinterventionsonshiftworkrelatedsleepdisturbanceinanoccupationalsetting
AT kylesimon scopingreviewoftheevidencefortheimpactofpharmacologicalandnonpharmacologicalinterventionsonshiftworkrelatedsleepdisturbanceinanoccupationalsetting
AT raydavid scopingreviewoftheevidencefortheimpactofpharmacologicalandnonpharmacologicalinterventionsonshiftworkrelatedsleepdisturbanceinanoccupationalsetting
AT robertsnia scopingreviewoftheevidencefortheimpactofpharmacologicalandnonpharmacologicalinterventionsonshiftworkrelatedsleepdisturbanceinanoccupationalsetting
AT farmerandrew scopingreviewoftheevidencefortheimpactofpharmacologicalandnonpharmacologicalinterventionsonshiftworkrelatedsleepdisturbanceinanoccupationalsetting