Cargando…
Deep learning and support vector machines for transcription start site identification
Recognizing transcription start sites is key to gene identification. Several approaches have been employed in related problems such as detecting translation initiation sites or promoters, many of the most recent ones based on machine learning. Deep learning methods have been proven to be exceptional...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10280436/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37346545 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1340 |
_version_ | 1785060793765593088 |
---|---|
author | Barbero-Aparicio, José A. Olivares-Gil, Alicia Díez-Pastor, José F. García-Osorio, César |
author_facet | Barbero-Aparicio, José A. Olivares-Gil, Alicia Díez-Pastor, José F. García-Osorio, César |
author_sort | Barbero-Aparicio, José A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recognizing transcription start sites is key to gene identification. Several approaches have been employed in related problems such as detecting translation initiation sites or promoters, many of the most recent ones based on machine learning. Deep learning methods have been proven to be exceptionally effective for this task, but their use in transcription start site identification has not yet been explored in depth. Also, the very few existing works do not compare their methods to support vector machines (SVMs), the most established technique in this area of study, nor provide the curated dataset used in the study. The reduced amount of published papers in this specific problem could be explained by this lack of datasets. Given that both support vector machines and deep neural networks have been applied in related problems with remarkable results, we compared their performance in transcription start site predictions, concluding that SVMs are computationally much slower, and deep learning methods, specially long short-term memory neural networks (LSTMs), are best suited to work with sequences than SVMs. For such a purpose, we used the reference human genome GRCh38. Additionally, we studied two different aspects related to data processing: the proper way to generate training examples and the imbalanced nature of the data. Furthermore, the generalization performance of the models studied was also tested using the mouse genome, where the LSTM neural network stood out from the rest of the algorithms. To sum up, this article provides an analysis of the best architecture choices in transcription start site identification, as well as a method to generate transcription start site datasets including negative instances on any species available in Ensembl. We found that deep learning methods are better suited than SVMs to solve this problem, being more efficient and better adapted to long sequences and large amounts of data. We also create a transcription start site (TSS) dataset large enough to be used in deep learning experiments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10280436 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102804362023-06-21 Deep learning and support vector machines for transcription start site identification Barbero-Aparicio, José A. Olivares-Gil, Alicia Díez-Pastor, José F. García-Osorio, César PeerJ Comput Sci Bioinformatics Recognizing transcription start sites is key to gene identification. Several approaches have been employed in related problems such as detecting translation initiation sites or promoters, many of the most recent ones based on machine learning. Deep learning methods have been proven to be exceptionally effective for this task, but their use in transcription start site identification has not yet been explored in depth. Also, the very few existing works do not compare their methods to support vector machines (SVMs), the most established technique in this area of study, nor provide the curated dataset used in the study. The reduced amount of published papers in this specific problem could be explained by this lack of datasets. Given that both support vector machines and deep neural networks have been applied in related problems with remarkable results, we compared their performance in transcription start site predictions, concluding that SVMs are computationally much slower, and deep learning methods, specially long short-term memory neural networks (LSTMs), are best suited to work with sequences than SVMs. For such a purpose, we used the reference human genome GRCh38. Additionally, we studied two different aspects related to data processing: the proper way to generate training examples and the imbalanced nature of the data. Furthermore, the generalization performance of the models studied was also tested using the mouse genome, where the LSTM neural network stood out from the rest of the algorithms. To sum up, this article provides an analysis of the best architecture choices in transcription start site identification, as well as a method to generate transcription start site datasets including negative instances on any species available in Ensembl. We found that deep learning methods are better suited than SVMs to solve this problem, being more efficient and better adapted to long sequences and large amounts of data. We also create a transcription start site (TSS) dataset large enough to be used in deep learning experiments. PeerJ Inc. 2023-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10280436/ /pubmed/37346545 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1340 Text en ©2023 Barbero-Aparicio et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ Computer Science) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Bioinformatics Barbero-Aparicio, José A. Olivares-Gil, Alicia Díez-Pastor, José F. García-Osorio, César Deep learning and support vector machines for transcription start site identification |
title | Deep learning and support vector machines for transcription start site identification |
title_full | Deep learning and support vector machines for transcription start site identification |
title_fullStr | Deep learning and support vector machines for transcription start site identification |
title_full_unstemmed | Deep learning and support vector machines for transcription start site identification |
title_short | Deep learning and support vector machines for transcription start site identification |
title_sort | deep learning and support vector machines for transcription start site identification |
topic | Bioinformatics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10280436/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37346545 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1340 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barberoapariciojosea deeplearningandsupportvectormachinesfortranscriptionstartsiteidentification AT olivaresgilalicia deeplearningandsupportvectormachinesfortranscriptionstartsiteidentification AT diezpastorjosef deeplearningandsupportvectormachinesfortranscriptionstartsiteidentification AT garciaosoriocesar deeplearningandsupportvectormachinesfortranscriptionstartsiteidentification |