Cargando…

Comparison of Analgesia Treatment Methods After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Network Meta-analysis of 42 Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND: The optimal method for postoperative analgesia after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) is still unclear. PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of postoperative analgesic methods after ARCR through network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective controlled trials. S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Su, Peng, Liu, Yijia, Zhang, Lu, Bai, Long-bin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10280546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37346775
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671231167128
_version_ 1785060819037323264
author Su, Peng
Liu, Yijia
Zhang, Lu
Bai, Long-bin
author_facet Su, Peng
Liu, Yijia
Zhang, Lu
Bai, Long-bin
author_sort Su, Peng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The optimal method for postoperative analgesia after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) is still unclear. PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of postoperative analgesic methods after ARCR through network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective controlled trials. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: Following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, we searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from inception until April 12, 2022, for randomized controlled trials and prospective controlled trials evaluating neuraxial analgesia, peripheral nerve block, periarticular local anesthetic infiltration, intravenous patient-controlled analgesia, oral analgesia, or any combination of these methods for pain management after ARCR. Outcomes included pain scores at rest, morphine consumption, and complications (nausea and vomiting). Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Network meta-analysis was used to assess the relative efficacy of the methods for postoperative analgesia. The best choice for postoperative analgesia was defined as the one with significant differences in pain scores and morphine consumption compared with placebo, with no significant difference in complications, during the initial 48 hours postoperatively. RESULTS: Included were 42 studies with 3110 patients. Only suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) was significantly superior to placebo in pain scores (mean difference [MD], –0.93 [95% CI, –1.31 to –0.54] at 6 hours; MD, –2.34 [95% CI, –3.49 to –1.19] at 12 hours) and morphine consumption (MD, –17.70 [95% CI, –32.98 to –2.42] at 24 hours) (P < .05 for all), with no difference in complications (odds ratio, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.21 to 4.32]; P > .05). Pain scores were significantly lower with interscalene nerve block compared with SSNB (MD, –0.69 [95% CI, –1.17 to –0.20] at 6 hours; MD, –1.44 [95% CI, –2.21 to –0.67] at 12 hours) and with SSNB + axillary nerve block compared with SSNB (MD, –3.09 [95% CI, –4.18 to –1.99] at 6 hours; MD, –0.87 [95% CI, –1.71 to –0.03] at 12 hours) (P < .05 for all). CONCLUSION: Based on the current evidence, most analgesic methods lowered pain and morphine consumption compared with placebo. There were significant differences in pain scores between interscalene nerve block and SSNB during the first 12 hours postoperatively, and adding axillary nerve block to SSNB enhanced the analgesic effect.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10280546
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102805462023-06-21 Comparison of Analgesia Treatment Methods After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Network Meta-analysis of 42 Randomized Controlled Trials Su, Peng Liu, Yijia Zhang, Lu Bai, Long-bin Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: The optimal method for postoperative analgesia after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) is still unclear. PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of postoperative analgesic methods after ARCR through network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective controlled trials. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: Following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, we searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from inception until April 12, 2022, for randomized controlled trials and prospective controlled trials evaluating neuraxial analgesia, peripheral nerve block, periarticular local anesthetic infiltration, intravenous patient-controlled analgesia, oral analgesia, or any combination of these methods for pain management after ARCR. Outcomes included pain scores at rest, morphine consumption, and complications (nausea and vomiting). Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Network meta-analysis was used to assess the relative efficacy of the methods for postoperative analgesia. The best choice for postoperative analgesia was defined as the one with significant differences in pain scores and morphine consumption compared with placebo, with no significant difference in complications, during the initial 48 hours postoperatively. RESULTS: Included were 42 studies with 3110 patients. Only suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) was significantly superior to placebo in pain scores (mean difference [MD], –0.93 [95% CI, –1.31 to –0.54] at 6 hours; MD, –2.34 [95% CI, –3.49 to –1.19] at 12 hours) and morphine consumption (MD, –17.70 [95% CI, –32.98 to –2.42] at 24 hours) (P < .05 for all), with no difference in complications (odds ratio, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.21 to 4.32]; P > .05). Pain scores were significantly lower with interscalene nerve block compared with SSNB (MD, –0.69 [95% CI, –1.17 to –0.20] at 6 hours; MD, –1.44 [95% CI, –2.21 to –0.67] at 12 hours) and with SSNB + axillary nerve block compared with SSNB (MD, –3.09 [95% CI, –4.18 to –1.99] at 6 hours; MD, –0.87 [95% CI, –1.71 to –0.03] at 12 hours) (P < .05 for all). CONCLUSION: Based on the current evidence, most analgesic methods lowered pain and morphine consumption compared with placebo. There were significant differences in pain scores between interscalene nerve block and SSNB during the first 12 hours postoperatively, and adding axillary nerve block to SSNB enhanced the analgesic effect. SAGE Publications 2023-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10280546/ /pubmed/37346775 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671231167128 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Su, Peng
Liu, Yijia
Zhang, Lu
Bai, Long-bin
Comparison of Analgesia Treatment Methods After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Network Meta-analysis of 42 Randomized Controlled Trials
title Comparison of Analgesia Treatment Methods After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Network Meta-analysis of 42 Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full Comparison of Analgesia Treatment Methods After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Network Meta-analysis of 42 Randomized Controlled Trials
title_fullStr Comparison of Analgesia Treatment Methods After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Network Meta-analysis of 42 Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Analgesia Treatment Methods After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Network Meta-analysis of 42 Randomized Controlled Trials
title_short Comparison of Analgesia Treatment Methods After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Network Meta-analysis of 42 Randomized Controlled Trials
title_sort comparison of analgesia treatment methods after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a network meta-analysis of 42 randomized controlled trials
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10280546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37346775
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671231167128
work_keys_str_mv AT supeng comparisonofanalgesiatreatmentmethodsafterarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairanetworkmetaanalysisof42randomizedcontrolledtrials
AT liuyijia comparisonofanalgesiatreatmentmethodsafterarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairanetworkmetaanalysisof42randomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhanglu comparisonofanalgesiatreatmentmethodsafterarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairanetworkmetaanalysisof42randomizedcontrolledtrials
AT bailongbin comparisonofanalgesiatreatmentmethodsafterarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairanetworkmetaanalysisof42randomizedcontrolledtrials