Cargando…

Fracaso de un anticuerpo monoclonal anti-CGRP en el tratamiento de la migraña. ¿Tiene sentido probar otro?

INTRODUCTION. Migraine is a highly prevalent neurological disease and the search for an effective treatment to improve the patient’s quality of life is essential. In 2018, anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies were approved in Spain as a preventive treatment, and have proved to be effective in reducing th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: López-Moreno, Yolanda, Castro-Sánchez, M. Victoria, García-Trujillo, Lucía, Serrano-Castro, Pedro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Viguera Editores (Evidenze Group) 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10280712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35866533
http://dx.doi.org/10.33588/rn.7504.2021526
_version_ 1785060858112507904
author López-Moreno, Yolanda
Castro-Sánchez, M. Victoria
García-Trujillo, Lucía
Serrano-Castro, Pedro
author_facet López-Moreno, Yolanda
Castro-Sánchez, M. Victoria
García-Trujillo, Lucía
Serrano-Castro, Pedro
author_sort López-Moreno, Yolanda
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION. Migraine is a highly prevalent neurological disease and the search for an effective treatment to improve the patient’s quality of life is essential. In 2018, anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies were approved in Spain as a preventive treatment, and have proved to be effective in reducing the number of migraine crisis per month compared to placebo. PATIENTS AND METHODS. We conducted a descriptive and retrospective study of 14 patients suffering from high-frequency or chronic episodic migraine, under follow-up in our headache unit, in whom an anti-CGRP monoclonal was changed due to its ineffectiveness. Epidemiological data and variables related to the response to both drugs were collected, such as headache days per month and migraine days per month, as well as validated quality of life scales (Migraine Disability Assessment Scale and Headache Impact Test-6). RESULTS. 50% of patients were males, with a median age of 46.5 years and 92% were diagnosed with chronic migraine. A follow-up of 6 to 12 months after the change of treatment was performed in 91.6% and significant improvement was observed in 33% of the patients. In addition, 50% had an initial response after three doses of the first monoclonal drug. CONCLUSIONS. In our series, 66% of patients who did not respond to a first drug responded initially to the switch and this improvement was maintained in 36% of them. Larger studies are needed to clarify this difference in response to different anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10280712
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Viguera Editores (Evidenze Group)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102807122023-06-21 Fracaso de un anticuerpo monoclonal anti-CGRP en el tratamiento de la migraña. ¿Tiene sentido probar otro? López-Moreno, Yolanda Castro-Sánchez, M. Victoria García-Trujillo, Lucía Serrano-Castro, Pedro Rev Neurol Original Breve INTRODUCTION. Migraine is a highly prevalent neurological disease and the search for an effective treatment to improve the patient’s quality of life is essential. In 2018, anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies were approved in Spain as a preventive treatment, and have proved to be effective in reducing the number of migraine crisis per month compared to placebo. PATIENTS AND METHODS. We conducted a descriptive and retrospective study of 14 patients suffering from high-frequency or chronic episodic migraine, under follow-up in our headache unit, in whom an anti-CGRP monoclonal was changed due to its ineffectiveness. Epidemiological data and variables related to the response to both drugs were collected, such as headache days per month and migraine days per month, as well as validated quality of life scales (Migraine Disability Assessment Scale and Headache Impact Test-6). RESULTS. 50% of patients were males, with a median age of 46.5 years and 92% were diagnosed with chronic migraine. A follow-up of 6 to 12 months after the change of treatment was performed in 91.6% and significant improvement was observed in 33% of the patients. In addition, 50% had an initial response after three doses of the first monoclonal drug. CONCLUSIONS. In our series, 66% of patients who did not respond to a first drug responded initially to the switch and this improvement was maintained in 36% of them. Larger studies are needed to clarify this difference in response to different anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies. Viguera Editores (Evidenze Group) 2022-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10280712/ /pubmed/35866533 http://dx.doi.org/10.33588/rn.7504.2021526 Text en Copyright: © Revista de Neurología https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Revista de Neurología trabaja bajo una licencia Creative Commons
spellingShingle Original Breve
López-Moreno, Yolanda
Castro-Sánchez, M. Victoria
García-Trujillo, Lucía
Serrano-Castro, Pedro
Fracaso de un anticuerpo monoclonal anti-CGRP en el tratamiento de la migraña. ¿Tiene sentido probar otro?
title Fracaso de un anticuerpo monoclonal anti-CGRP en el tratamiento de la migraña. ¿Tiene sentido probar otro?
title_full Fracaso de un anticuerpo monoclonal anti-CGRP en el tratamiento de la migraña. ¿Tiene sentido probar otro?
title_fullStr Fracaso de un anticuerpo monoclonal anti-CGRP en el tratamiento de la migraña. ¿Tiene sentido probar otro?
title_full_unstemmed Fracaso de un anticuerpo monoclonal anti-CGRP en el tratamiento de la migraña. ¿Tiene sentido probar otro?
title_short Fracaso de un anticuerpo monoclonal anti-CGRP en el tratamiento de la migraña. ¿Tiene sentido probar otro?
title_sort fracaso de un anticuerpo monoclonal anti-cgrp en el tratamiento de la migraña. ¿tiene sentido probar otro?
topic Original Breve
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10280712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35866533
http://dx.doi.org/10.33588/rn.7504.2021526
work_keys_str_mv AT lopezmorenoyolanda fracasodeunanticuerpomonoclonalanticgrpeneltratamientodelamigranatienesentidoprobarotro
AT castrosanchezmvictoria fracasodeunanticuerpomonoclonalanticgrpeneltratamientodelamigranatienesentidoprobarotro
AT garciatrujillolucia fracasodeunanticuerpomonoclonalanticgrpeneltratamientodelamigranatienesentidoprobarotro
AT serranocastropedro fracasodeunanticuerpomonoclonalanticgrpeneltratamientodelamigranatienesentidoprobarotro