Application of neuroendoscopic surgery in treatment of hypertensive basal ganglia hemorrhage

INTRODUCTION. The influence of Application of neuroendoscopic surgery in treatment of hypertensive basal ganglia hemorrhage remains largely unknown. AIM. To compare the clinical efficacy of minimally invasive neuroendoscopic surgery (NES) and small bone window craniotomy (SBWC) microsurgery on the treatment of patients with hypertensive basal ganglia hemorrhage (HBGH). PATIENTS AND METHODS. The clinical data of 174 HBGH patients treated in our hospital from January 2018 to September 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into minimally invasive NES group (n = 90) and SBWC microsurgery group (n = 84). Their operation time, hematoma clearance rate, rebleeding and prognosis were compared. RESULTS. In minimally invasive NES group, the operation time and intraoperative hemostasis time were significantly shorter, and the intraoperative blood loss was significantly less than those in SBWC microsurgery group (p < 0.001). The preoperative Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score was 8.64 ± 1.04 points and 8.68 ± 1.02 points respectively in minimally invasive NES group and SBWC microsurgery group (p > 0.05). At 24 h after operation, the GCS score in minimally invasive NES group rose to 12.89 ± 1.56 points, and it had a significant difference from that in SBWC microsurgery group (11.18 ± 1.14 points, p < 0.001). The volume of brain edema was 11.82 ± 3.25 mL in minimally invasive NES group and 18.89 ± 3.15 mL in SBWC microsurgery group (p < 0.001). In minimally invasive NES group, the clearance of hematoma was superior to that in SBWC microsurgery group, and the prognosis was also better than that in SBWC microsurgery group. CONCLUSIONS. Minimally invasive NES has better efficacy than SBWC microsurgery in the treatment of HBGH.