Cargando…
Assessment of the canal anatomy of the premolar teeth in a selected Turkish population: a cone-beam computed tomography study
BACKGROUND: Teeth may have additional roots and a different number of root canals. Overlooked root canals may cause endodontic failure. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of root canals and the number of roots of premolars in a selected Turkish population. MATERIALS AND METHODS:...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10280818/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37337200 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03107-7 |
_version_ | 1785060879858925568 |
---|---|
author | Erkan, Erhan Olcay, Keziban Eyüboğlu, Tan Fırat Şener, Elif Gündoğar, Mustafa |
author_facet | Erkan, Erhan Olcay, Keziban Eyüboğlu, Tan Fırat Şener, Elif Gündoğar, Mustafa |
author_sort | Erkan, Erhan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Teeth may have additional roots and a different number of root canals. Overlooked root canals may cause endodontic failure. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of root canals and the number of roots of premolars in a selected Turkish population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 2,570 teeth from 1,438 patients were evaluated. The cone-beam computed tomography scans of 1,055 maxillary and 1,515 mandibular premolars were examined. RESULTS: Type IV root canal morphology was observed most frequently in maxillary first premolars (77%), and the rates of single and double channel formations were very similar (51% and 49%, respectively). Of the second maxillary premolars, 57.4% had Type I morphology, and 89.9% of the teeth were single-rooted, while 68.6% had a single root canal. The most common formation was Type I (85%) among mandibular first premolars, and a single root was observed in 95.6% of these teeth. In addition, 87% of the mandibular first premolars had a single root canal. The second mandibular premolars mostly had Type I (95.4%) formation, and 99.3% of the teeth were single-rooted, while 96.9% had a single root canal. CONCLUSION: According to our findings, 51% of maxillary first premolars had a single root, 79.4% had two root canals, and 77% had Type IV (77%) formation. Maxillary second premolars mostly had Type I formation. In addition, a single root and single root canal formation were most common. Mandibular first premolars generally had a single root and single root canal formation, but 13% had two root canals, and 6.4% had Type V formation. More than 95% of mandibular second premolars had Type I formation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10280818 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102808182023-06-21 Assessment of the canal anatomy of the premolar teeth in a selected Turkish population: a cone-beam computed tomography study Erkan, Erhan Olcay, Keziban Eyüboğlu, Tan Fırat Şener, Elif Gündoğar, Mustafa BMC Oral Health Research BACKGROUND: Teeth may have additional roots and a different number of root canals. Overlooked root canals may cause endodontic failure. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of root canals and the number of roots of premolars in a selected Turkish population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 2,570 teeth from 1,438 patients were evaluated. The cone-beam computed tomography scans of 1,055 maxillary and 1,515 mandibular premolars were examined. RESULTS: Type IV root canal morphology was observed most frequently in maxillary first premolars (77%), and the rates of single and double channel formations were very similar (51% and 49%, respectively). Of the second maxillary premolars, 57.4% had Type I morphology, and 89.9% of the teeth were single-rooted, while 68.6% had a single root canal. The most common formation was Type I (85%) among mandibular first premolars, and a single root was observed in 95.6% of these teeth. In addition, 87% of the mandibular first premolars had a single root canal. The second mandibular premolars mostly had Type I (95.4%) formation, and 99.3% of the teeth were single-rooted, while 96.9% had a single root canal. CONCLUSION: According to our findings, 51% of maxillary first premolars had a single root, 79.4% had two root canals, and 77% had Type IV (77%) formation. Maxillary second premolars mostly had Type I formation. In addition, a single root and single root canal formation were most common. Mandibular first premolars generally had a single root and single root canal formation, but 13% had two root canals, and 6.4% had Type V formation. More than 95% of mandibular second premolars had Type I formation. BioMed Central 2023-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10280818/ /pubmed/37337200 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03107-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Erkan, Erhan Olcay, Keziban Eyüboğlu, Tan Fırat Şener, Elif Gündoğar, Mustafa Assessment of the canal anatomy of the premolar teeth in a selected Turkish population: a cone-beam computed tomography study |
title | Assessment of the canal anatomy of the premolar teeth in a selected Turkish population: a cone-beam computed tomography study |
title_full | Assessment of the canal anatomy of the premolar teeth in a selected Turkish population: a cone-beam computed tomography study |
title_fullStr | Assessment of the canal anatomy of the premolar teeth in a selected Turkish population: a cone-beam computed tomography study |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of the canal anatomy of the premolar teeth in a selected Turkish population: a cone-beam computed tomography study |
title_short | Assessment of the canal anatomy of the premolar teeth in a selected Turkish population: a cone-beam computed tomography study |
title_sort | assessment of the canal anatomy of the premolar teeth in a selected turkish population: a cone-beam computed tomography study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10280818/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37337200 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03107-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT erkanerhan assessmentofthecanalanatomyofthepremolarteethinaselectedturkishpopulationaconebeamcomputedtomographystudy AT olcaykeziban assessmentofthecanalanatomyofthepremolarteethinaselectedturkishpopulationaconebeamcomputedtomographystudy AT eyuboglutanfırat assessmentofthecanalanatomyofthepremolarteethinaselectedturkishpopulationaconebeamcomputedtomographystudy AT senerelif assessmentofthecanalanatomyofthepremolarteethinaselectedturkishpopulationaconebeamcomputedtomographystudy AT gundogarmustafa assessmentofthecanalanatomyofthepremolarteethinaselectedturkishpopulationaconebeamcomputedtomographystudy |