Cargando…
Efficacy of using Maryland forceps versus electrocoagulation hooks in da Vinci robot-assisted thoracoscopic mediastinal tumor resection
BACKGROUND: To compare the difference of short-term curative effect between the use of Maryland forceps (MF) and electrocoagulation hooks (EH) in da Vinci robot-assisted thoracoscopic mediastinal tumor resection. METHODS: Retrospectively analyze 84 patients with mediastinal tumors who underwent robo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10280858/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37337217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-03065-y |
_version_ | 1785060889684082688 |
---|---|
author | Hong, Ziqiang Bai, Xiangdou Sheng, Yannan Cui, Baiqiang Lu, Yingjie Cheng, Tao Wu, Xusheng Jin, Dacheng Gou, Yunjiu Zhao, Jing |
author_facet | Hong, Ziqiang Bai, Xiangdou Sheng, Yannan Cui, Baiqiang Lu, Yingjie Cheng, Tao Wu, Xusheng Jin, Dacheng Gou, Yunjiu Zhao, Jing |
author_sort | Hong, Ziqiang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To compare the difference of short-term curative effect between the use of Maryland forceps (MF) and electrocoagulation hooks (EH) in da Vinci robot-assisted thoracoscopic mediastinal tumor resection. METHODS: Retrospectively analyze 84 patients with mediastinal tumors who underwent robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) at the Department of Thoracic Surgery in Gansu Provincial Hospital from February 2019 to February 2023. Two groups were divided according to the intraoperative use of energy devices, including 41 cases in the MF group and 43 cases in the EH group. Perioperative clinical data was gathered to compare the short-term efficacy of patients in both groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics such as sex (P = 0.685), age (P = 0.165), and tumor size (P = 0.339) between the two groups. Compared with the EH group, patients in the MF group have shorter operative time (P = 0.030), less intraoperative bleeding (P = 0.010), less total postoperative drainage volume (P = 0.001), shorter postoperative drainage time (P = 0.022), shorter hospital stay (P = 0.019), and lower levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-8 (IL-8), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and cortisol. No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of total hospitalization costs (P = 0.123), postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores (P = 0.064), and postoperative complications (P = 0.431). CONCLUSION: Using MF in RATS for mediastinal tumor is safe and effective, which can reduce the amount of bleeding, reduce the degree of inflammatory reaction, and conducive to the quick recovery of patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10280858 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102808582023-06-21 Efficacy of using Maryland forceps versus electrocoagulation hooks in da Vinci robot-assisted thoracoscopic mediastinal tumor resection Hong, Ziqiang Bai, Xiangdou Sheng, Yannan Cui, Baiqiang Lu, Yingjie Cheng, Tao Wu, Xusheng Jin, Dacheng Gou, Yunjiu Zhao, Jing World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: To compare the difference of short-term curative effect between the use of Maryland forceps (MF) and electrocoagulation hooks (EH) in da Vinci robot-assisted thoracoscopic mediastinal tumor resection. METHODS: Retrospectively analyze 84 patients with mediastinal tumors who underwent robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) at the Department of Thoracic Surgery in Gansu Provincial Hospital from February 2019 to February 2023. Two groups were divided according to the intraoperative use of energy devices, including 41 cases in the MF group and 43 cases in the EH group. Perioperative clinical data was gathered to compare the short-term efficacy of patients in both groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics such as sex (P = 0.685), age (P = 0.165), and tumor size (P = 0.339) between the two groups. Compared with the EH group, patients in the MF group have shorter operative time (P = 0.030), less intraoperative bleeding (P = 0.010), less total postoperative drainage volume (P = 0.001), shorter postoperative drainage time (P = 0.022), shorter hospital stay (P = 0.019), and lower levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-8 (IL-8), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and cortisol. No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of total hospitalization costs (P = 0.123), postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores (P = 0.064), and postoperative complications (P = 0.431). CONCLUSION: Using MF in RATS for mediastinal tumor is safe and effective, which can reduce the amount of bleeding, reduce the degree of inflammatory reaction, and conducive to the quick recovery of patients. BioMed Central 2023-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10280858/ /pubmed/37337217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-03065-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Hong, Ziqiang Bai, Xiangdou Sheng, Yannan Cui, Baiqiang Lu, Yingjie Cheng, Tao Wu, Xusheng Jin, Dacheng Gou, Yunjiu Zhao, Jing Efficacy of using Maryland forceps versus electrocoagulation hooks in da Vinci robot-assisted thoracoscopic mediastinal tumor resection |
title | Efficacy of using Maryland forceps versus electrocoagulation hooks in da Vinci robot-assisted thoracoscopic mediastinal tumor resection |
title_full | Efficacy of using Maryland forceps versus electrocoagulation hooks in da Vinci robot-assisted thoracoscopic mediastinal tumor resection |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of using Maryland forceps versus electrocoagulation hooks in da Vinci robot-assisted thoracoscopic mediastinal tumor resection |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of using Maryland forceps versus electrocoagulation hooks in da Vinci robot-assisted thoracoscopic mediastinal tumor resection |
title_short | Efficacy of using Maryland forceps versus electrocoagulation hooks in da Vinci robot-assisted thoracoscopic mediastinal tumor resection |
title_sort | efficacy of using maryland forceps versus electrocoagulation hooks in da vinci robot-assisted thoracoscopic mediastinal tumor resection |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10280858/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37337217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-03065-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hongziqiang efficacyofusingmarylandforcepsversuselectrocoagulationhooksindavincirobotassistedthoracoscopicmediastinaltumorresection AT baixiangdou efficacyofusingmarylandforcepsversuselectrocoagulationhooksindavincirobotassistedthoracoscopicmediastinaltumorresection AT shengyannan efficacyofusingmarylandforcepsversuselectrocoagulationhooksindavincirobotassistedthoracoscopicmediastinaltumorresection AT cuibaiqiang efficacyofusingmarylandforcepsversuselectrocoagulationhooksindavincirobotassistedthoracoscopicmediastinaltumorresection AT luyingjie efficacyofusingmarylandforcepsversuselectrocoagulationhooksindavincirobotassistedthoracoscopicmediastinaltumorresection AT chengtao efficacyofusingmarylandforcepsversuselectrocoagulationhooksindavincirobotassistedthoracoscopicmediastinaltumorresection AT wuxusheng efficacyofusingmarylandforcepsversuselectrocoagulationhooksindavincirobotassistedthoracoscopicmediastinaltumorresection AT jindacheng efficacyofusingmarylandforcepsversuselectrocoagulationhooksindavincirobotassistedthoracoscopicmediastinaltumorresection AT gouyunjiu efficacyofusingmarylandforcepsversuselectrocoagulationhooksindavincirobotassistedthoracoscopicmediastinaltumorresection AT zhaojing efficacyofusingmarylandforcepsversuselectrocoagulationhooksindavincirobotassistedthoracoscopicmediastinaltumorresection |