Cargando…

Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of an early intervention in psychosis service in three demonstration sites in Ireland

BACKGROUND: Programmes for early intervention (EIP) in psychosis for people experiencing a first episode of psychosis (FEP) have been found to be both clinically and cost effective. Following the publication of a new EIP model of care (MoC) in Ireland, the aim of this research is to describe how peo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Darker, C.D., Nicolson, G., Reddon, H., O’Connor, K., Jennings, R., O’Connell, N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10280934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37337176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09585-3
_version_ 1785060907777261568
author Darker, C.D.
Nicolson, G.
Reddon, H.
O’Connor, K.
Jennings, R.
O’Connell, N.
author_facet Darker, C.D.
Nicolson, G.
Reddon, H.
O’Connor, K.
Jennings, R.
O’Connell, N.
author_sort Darker, C.D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Programmes for early intervention (EIP) in psychosis for people experiencing a first episode of psychosis (FEP) have been found to be both clinically and cost effective. Following the publication of a new EIP model of care (MoC) in Ireland, the aim of this research is to describe how people participated in and responded to the MoC including service users, family members, HSE clinical staff and HSE management. METHODS: Qualitative design using the UK Medical Research Council’s process evaluation framework. Purposive sampling techniques were used. A total of N = 40 key informant semi-structured interviews were completed which included clinical staff (N = 22), health service managers and administrators (N = 9), service users (N = 8) and a family member (N = 1). Thematic analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Unique features of the EIP service (e.g., speed of referral/assessment, multidisciplinary approach, a range of evidence-based interventions and assertive MDT follow up) and enthusiasm for EIP were identified as two key factors that facilitated implementation. In contrast, obstacles to staff recruitment and budget challenges emerged as two primary barriers to implementation. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this research provide real world insights into the complexity of implementing an innovative service within an existing health system. Clear and committed financial and human resource processes which allow new innovations to thrive and be protected during their initiation and early implementation phase are paramount. These elements should be considered in the planning and implementation of EIP services both nationally in Ireland and internationally. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-023-09585-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10280934
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102809342023-06-21 Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of an early intervention in psychosis service in three demonstration sites in Ireland Darker, C.D. Nicolson, G. Reddon, H. O’Connor, K. Jennings, R. O’Connell, N. BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: Programmes for early intervention (EIP) in psychosis for people experiencing a first episode of psychosis (FEP) have been found to be both clinically and cost effective. Following the publication of a new EIP model of care (MoC) in Ireland, the aim of this research is to describe how people participated in and responded to the MoC including service users, family members, HSE clinical staff and HSE management. METHODS: Qualitative design using the UK Medical Research Council’s process evaluation framework. Purposive sampling techniques were used. A total of N = 40 key informant semi-structured interviews were completed which included clinical staff (N = 22), health service managers and administrators (N = 9), service users (N = 8) and a family member (N = 1). Thematic analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Unique features of the EIP service (e.g., speed of referral/assessment, multidisciplinary approach, a range of evidence-based interventions and assertive MDT follow up) and enthusiasm for EIP were identified as two key factors that facilitated implementation. In contrast, obstacles to staff recruitment and budget challenges emerged as two primary barriers to implementation. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this research provide real world insights into the complexity of implementing an innovative service within an existing health system. Clear and committed financial and human resource processes which allow new innovations to thrive and be protected during their initiation and early implementation phase are paramount. These elements should be considered in the planning and implementation of EIP services both nationally in Ireland and internationally. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-023-09585-3. BioMed Central 2023-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10280934/ /pubmed/37337176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09585-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Darker, C.D.
Nicolson, G.
Reddon, H.
O’Connor, K.
Jennings, R.
O’Connell, N.
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of an early intervention in psychosis service in three demonstration sites in Ireland
title Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of an early intervention in psychosis service in three demonstration sites in Ireland
title_full Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of an early intervention in psychosis service in three demonstration sites in Ireland
title_fullStr Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of an early intervention in psychosis service in three demonstration sites in Ireland
title_full_unstemmed Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of an early intervention in psychosis service in three demonstration sites in Ireland
title_short Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of an early intervention in psychosis service in three demonstration sites in Ireland
title_sort barriers and facilitators to the implementation of an early intervention in psychosis service in three demonstration sites in ireland
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10280934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37337176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09585-3
work_keys_str_mv AT darkercd barriersandfacilitatorstotheimplementationofanearlyinterventioninpsychosisserviceinthreedemonstrationsitesinireland
AT nicolsong barriersandfacilitatorstotheimplementationofanearlyinterventioninpsychosisserviceinthreedemonstrationsitesinireland
AT reddonh barriersandfacilitatorstotheimplementationofanearlyinterventioninpsychosisserviceinthreedemonstrationsitesinireland
AT oconnork barriersandfacilitatorstotheimplementationofanearlyinterventioninpsychosisserviceinthreedemonstrationsitesinireland
AT jenningsr barriersandfacilitatorstotheimplementationofanearlyinterventioninpsychosisserviceinthreedemonstrationsitesinireland
AT oconnelln barriersandfacilitatorstotheimplementationofanearlyinterventioninpsychosisserviceinthreedemonstrationsitesinireland