Cargando…

Catheter-directed thrombolysis compared with systemic thrombolysis and anticoagulation in patients with intermediate- or high-risk pulmonary embolism: systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic options for intermediate- or high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) include anticoagulation, systemic thrombolysis and catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT); however, the role of CDT remains controversial. We sought to compare the efficacy and safety of CDT with other therapeutic o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Planer, David, Yanko, Stav, Matok, Ilan, Paltiel, Ora, Zmiro, Rama, Rotshild, Victoria, Amir, Offer, Elbaz-Greener, Gabby, Raccah, Bruria Hirsh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: CMA Impact Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10281204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37336568
http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.220960
_version_ 1785060962041069568
author Planer, David
Yanko, Stav
Matok, Ilan
Paltiel, Ora
Zmiro, Rama
Rotshild, Victoria
Amir, Offer
Elbaz-Greener, Gabby
Raccah, Bruria Hirsh
author_facet Planer, David
Yanko, Stav
Matok, Ilan
Paltiel, Ora
Zmiro, Rama
Rotshild, Victoria
Amir, Offer
Elbaz-Greener, Gabby
Raccah, Bruria Hirsh
author_sort Planer, David
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Therapeutic options for intermediate- or high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) include anticoagulation, systemic thrombolysis and catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT); however, the role of CDT remains controversial. We sought to compare the efficacy and safety of CDT with other therapeutic options using network meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane Library from inception to Oct. 18, 2022. We included randomized controlled trials and observational studies that compared therapeutic options for PE, including anticoagulation, systemic thrombolysis and CDT among patients with intermediate- or high-risk PE. The efficacy outcome was in-hospital death. Safety outcomes included major bleeding, intracerebral hemorrhage and minor bleeding. RESULTS: We included data from 44 studies, representing 20 006 patients. Compared with systemic thrombolysis, CDT was associated with a decreased risk of death (odd ratio [OR] 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32–0.57), intracerebral hemorrhage (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.29–0.64), major bleeding (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.53–0.70) and blood transfusion (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.28–0.77). However, no difference in minor bleeding was observed between the 2 therapeutic options (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.66–1.87). Compared with anticoagulation, CDT was also associated with decreased risk of death (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.25–0.52), with no increased risk of intracerebral hemorrhage (OR 1.33, 95% CI 0.63–2.79) or major bleeding (OR 1.24, 95% CI 0.88–1.75). INTERPRETATION: With moderate certainty of evidence, the risk of death and major bleeding complications was lower with CDT than with systemic thrombolysis. Compared with anticoagulation, CDT was associated with a probable lower risk of death and a similar risk of intracerebral hemorrhage, with moderate certainty of evidence. Although these findings are largely based on observational data, CDT may be considered as a first-line therapy in patients with intermediate- or high-risk PE. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO — CRD42020182163
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10281204
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher CMA Impact Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102812042023-06-21 Catheter-directed thrombolysis compared with systemic thrombolysis and anticoagulation in patients with intermediate- or high-risk pulmonary embolism: systematic review and network meta-analysis Planer, David Yanko, Stav Matok, Ilan Paltiel, Ora Zmiro, Rama Rotshild, Victoria Amir, Offer Elbaz-Greener, Gabby Raccah, Bruria Hirsh CMAJ Research BACKGROUND: Therapeutic options for intermediate- or high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) include anticoagulation, systemic thrombolysis and catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT); however, the role of CDT remains controversial. We sought to compare the efficacy and safety of CDT with other therapeutic options using network meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane Library from inception to Oct. 18, 2022. We included randomized controlled trials and observational studies that compared therapeutic options for PE, including anticoagulation, systemic thrombolysis and CDT among patients with intermediate- or high-risk PE. The efficacy outcome was in-hospital death. Safety outcomes included major bleeding, intracerebral hemorrhage and minor bleeding. RESULTS: We included data from 44 studies, representing 20 006 patients. Compared with systemic thrombolysis, CDT was associated with a decreased risk of death (odd ratio [OR] 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32–0.57), intracerebral hemorrhage (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.29–0.64), major bleeding (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.53–0.70) and blood transfusion (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.28–0.77). However, no difference in minor bleeding was observed between the 2 therapeutic options (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.66–1.87). Compared with anticoagulation, CDT was also associated with decreased risk of death (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.25–0.52), with no increased risk of intracerebral hemorrhage (OR 1.33, 95% CI 0.63–2.79) or major bleeding (OR 1.24, 95% CI 0.88–1.75). INTERPRETATION: With moderate certainty of evidence, the risk of death and major bleeding complications was lower with CDT than with systemic thrombolysis. Compared with anticoagulation, CDT was associated with a probable lower risk of death and a similar risk of intracerebral hemorrhage, with moderate certainty of evidence. Although these findings are largely based on observational data, CDT may be considered as a first-line therapy in patients with intermediate- or high-risk PE. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO — CRD42020182163 CMA Impact Inc. 2023-06-19 2023-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10281204/ /pubmed/37336568 http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.220960 Text en © 2023 CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original publication is properly cited, the use is noncommercial (i.e., research or educational use), and no modifications or adaptations are made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Research
Planer, David
Yanko, Stav
Matok, Ilan
Paltiel, Ora
Zmiro, Rama
Rotshild, Victoria
Amir, Offer
Elbaz-Greener, Gabby
Raccah, Bruria Hirsh
Catheter-directed thrombolysis compared with systemic thrombolysis and anticoagulation in patients with intermediate- or high-risk pulmonary embolism: systematic review and network meta-analysis
title Catheter-directed thrombolysis compared with systemic thrombolysis and anticoagulation in patients with intermediate- or high-risk pulmonary embolism: systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full Catheter-directed thrombolysis compared with systemic thrombolysis and anticoagulation in patients with intermediate- or high-risk pulmonary embolism: systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Catheter-directed thrombolysis compared with systemic thrombolysis and anticoagulation in patients with intermediate- or high-risk pulmonary embolism: systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Catheter-directed thrombolysis compared with systemic thrombolysis and anticoagulation in patients with intermediate- or high-risk pulmonary embolism: systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_short Catheter-directed thrombolysis compared with systemic thrombolysis and anticoagulation in patients with intermediate- or high-risk pulmonary embolism: systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_sort catheter-directed thrombolysis compared with systemic thrombolysis and anticoagulation in patients with intermediate- or high-risk pulmonary embolism: systematic review and network meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10281204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37336568
http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.220960
work_keys_str_mv AT planerdavid catheterdirectedthrombolysiscomparedwithsystemicthrombolysisandanticoagulationinpatientswithintermediateorhighriskpulmonaryembolismsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT yankostav catheterdirectedthrombolysiscomparedwithsystemicthrombolysisandanticoagulationinpatientswithintermediateorhighriskpulmonaryembolismsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT matokilan catheterdirectedthrombolysiscomparedwithsystemicthrombolysisandanticoagulationinpatientswithintermediateorhighriskpulmonaryembolismsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT paltielora catheterdirectedthrombolysiscomparedwithsystemicthrombolysisandanticoagulationinpatientswithintermediateorhighriskpulmonaryembolismsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT zmirorama catheterdirectedthrombolysiscomparedwithsystemicthrombolysisandanticoagulationinpatientswithintermediateorhighriskpulmonaryembolismsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT rotshildvictoria catheterdirectedthrombolysiscomparedwithsystemicthrombolysisandanticoagulationinpatientswithintermediateorhighriskpulmonaryembolismsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT amiroffer catheterdirectedthrombolysiscomparedwithsystemicthrombolysisandanticoagulationinpatientswithintermediateorhighriskpulmonaryembolismsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT elbazgreenergabby catheterdirectedthrombolysiscomparedwithsystemicthrombolysisandanticoagulationinpatientswithintermediateorhighriskpulmonaryembolismsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT raccahbruriahirsh catheterdirectedthrombolysiscomparedwithsystemicthrombolysisandanticoagulationinpatientswithintermediateorhighriskpulmonaryembolismsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis