Cargando…
Catheter-directed thrombolysis compared with systemic thrombolysis and anticoagulation in patients with intermediate- or high-risk pulmonary embolism: systematic review and network meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Therapeutic options for intermediate- or high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) include anticoagulation, systemic thrombolysis and catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT); however, the role of CDT remains controversial. We sought to compare the efficacy and safety of CDT with other therapeutic o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
CMA Impact Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10281204/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37336568 http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.220960 |
_version_ | 1785060962041069568 |
---|---|
author | Planer, David Yanko, Stav Matok, Ilan Paltiel, Ora Zmiro, Rama Rotshild, Victoria Amir, Offer Elbaz-Greener, Gabby Raccah, Bruria Hirsh |
author_facet | Planer, David Yanko, Stav Matok, Ilan Paltiel, Ora Zmiro, Rama Rotshild, Victoria Amir, Offer Elbaz-Greener, Gabby Raccah, Bruria Hirsh |
author_sort | Planer, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Therapeutic options for intermediate- or high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) include anticoagulation, systemic thrombolysis and catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT); however, the role of CDT remains controversial. We sought to compare the efficacy and safety of CDT with other therapeutic options using network meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane Library from inception to Oct. 18, 2022. We included randomized controlled trials and observational studies that compared therapeutic options for PE, including anticoagulation, systemic thrombolysis and CDT among patients with intermediate- or high-risk PE. The efficacy outcome was in-hospital death. Safety outcomes included major bleeding, intracerebral hemorrhage and minor bleeding. RESULTS: We included data from 44 studies, representing 20 006 patients. Compared with systemic thrombolysis, CDT was associated with a decreased risk of death (odd ratio [OR] 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32–0.57), intracerebral hemorrhage (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.29–0.64), major bleeding (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.53–0.70) and blood transfusion (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.28–0.77). However, no difference in minor bleeding was observed between the 2 therapeutic options (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.66–1.87). Compared with anticoagulation, CDT was also associated with decreased risk of death (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.25–0.52), with no increased risk of intracerebral hemorrhage (OR 1.33, 95% CI 0.63–2.79) or major bleeding (OR 1.24, 95% CI 0.88–1.75). INTERPRETATION: With moderate certainty of evidence, the risk of death and major bleeding complications was lower with CDT than with systemic thrombolysis. Compared with anticoagulation, CDT was associated with a probable lower risk of death and a similar risk of intracerebral hemorrhage, with moderate certainty of evidence. Although these findings are largely based on observational data, CDT may be considered as a first-line therapy in patients with intermediate- or high-risk PE. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO — CRD42020182163 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10281204 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | CMA Impact Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102812042023-06-21 Catheter-directed thrombolysis compared with systemic thrombolysis and anticoagulation in patients with intermediate- or high-risk pulmonary embolism: systematic review and network meta-analysis Planer, David Yanko, Stav Matok, Ilan Paltiel, Ora Zmiro, Rama Rotshild, Victoria Amir, Offer Elbaz-Greener, Gabby Raccah, Bruria Hirsh CMAJ Research BACKGROUND: Therapeutic options for intermediate- or high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) include anticoagulation, systemic thrombolysis and catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT); however, the role of CDT remains controversial. We sought to compare the efficacy and safety of CDT with other therapeutic options using network meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane Library from inception to Oct. 18, 2022. We included randomized controlled trials and observational studies that compared therapeutic options for PE, including anticoagulation, systemic thrombolysis and CDT among patients with intermediate- or high-risk PE. The efficacy outcome was in-hospital death. Safety outcomes included major bleeding, intracerebral hemorrhage and minor bleeding. RESULTS: We included data from 44 studies, representing 20 006 patients. Compared with systemic thrombolysis, CDT was associated with a decreased risk of death (odd ratio [OR] 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32–0.57), intracerebral hemorrhage (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.29–0.64), major bleeding (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.53–0.70) and blood transfusion (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.28–0.77). However, no difference in minor bleeding was observed between the 2 therapeutic options (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.66–1.87). Compared with anticoagulation, CDT was also associated with decreased risk of death (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.25–0.52), with no increased risk of intracerebral hemorrhage (OR 1.33, 95% CI 0.63–2.79) or major bleeding (OR 1.24, 95% CI 0.88–1.75). INTERPRETATION: With moderate certainty of evidence, the risk of death and major bleeding complications was lower with CDT than with systemic thrombolysis. Compared with anticoagulation, CDT was associated with a probable lower risk of death and a similar risk of intracerebral hemorrhage, with moderate certainty of evidence. Although these findings are largely based on observational data, CDT may be considered as a first-line therapy in patients with intermediate- or high-risk PE. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO — CRD42020182163 CMA Impact Inc. 2023-06-19 2023-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10281204/ /pubmed/37336568 http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.220960 Text en © 2023 CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original publication is properly cited, the use is noncommercial (i.e., research or educational use), and no modifications or adaptations are made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Research Planer, David Yanko, Stav Matok, Ilan Paltiel, Ora Zmiro, Rama Rotshild, Victoria Amir, Offer Elbaz-Greener, Gabby Raccah, Bruria Hirsh Catheter-directed thrombolysis compared with systemic thrombolysis and anticoagulation in patients with intermediate- or high-risk pulmonary embolism: systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title | Catheter-directed thrombolysis compared with systemic thrombolysis and anticoagulation in patients with intermediate- or high-risk pulmonary embolism: systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_full | Catheter-directed thrombolysis compared with systemic thrombolysis and anticoagulation in patients with intermediate- or high-risk pulmonary embolism: systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Catheter-directed thrombolysis compared with systemic thrombolysis and anticoagulation in patients with intermediate- or high-risk pulmonary embolism: systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Catheter-directed thrombolysis compared with systemic thrombolysis and anticoagulation in patients with intermediate- or high-risk pulmonary embolism: systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_short | Catheter-directed thrombolysis compared with systemic thrombolysis and anticoagulation in patients with intermediate- or high-risk pulmonary embolism: systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_sort | catheter-directed thrombolysis compared with systemic thrombolysis and anticoagulation in patients with intermediate- or high-risk pulmonary embolism: systematic review and network meta-analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10281204/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37336568 http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.220960 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT planerdavid catheterdirectedthrombolysiscomparedwithsystemicthrombolysisandanticoagulationinpatientswithintermediateorhighriskpulmonaryembolismsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT yankostav catheterdirectedthrombolysiscomparedwithsystemicthrombolysisandanticoagulationinpatientswithintermediateorhighriskpulmonaryembolismsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT matokilan catheterdirectedthrombolysiscomparedwithsystemicthrombolysisandanticoagulationinpatientswithintermediateorhighriskpulmonaryembolismsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT paltielora catheterdirectedthrombolysiscomparedwithsystemicthrombolysisandanticoagulationinpatientswithintermediateorhighriskpulmonaryembolismsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT zmirorama catheterdirectedthrombolysiscomparedwithsystemicthrombolysisandanticoagulationinpatientswithintermediateorhighriskpulmonaryembolismsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT rotshildvictoria catheterdirectedthrombolysiscomparedwithsystemicthrombolysisandanticoagulationinpatientswithintermediateorhighriskpulmonaryembolismsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT amiroffer catheterdirectedthrombolysiscomparedwithsystemicthrombolysisandanticoagulationinpatientswithintermediateorhighriskpulmonaryembolismsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT elbazgreenergabby catheterdirectedthrombolysiscomparedwithsystemicthrombolysisandanticoagulationinpatientswithintermediateorhighriskpulmonaryembolismsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT raccahbruriahirsh catheterdirectedthrombolysiscomparedwithsystemicthrombolysisandanticoagulationinpatientswithintermediateorhighriskpulmonaryembolismsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis |