Cargando…

Prophages and plasmids can display opposite trends in the types of accessory genes they carry

Mobile genetic elements (MGEs), such as phages and plasmids, often possess accessory genes encoding bacterial functions, facilitating bacterial evolution. Are there rules governing the arsenal of accessory genes MGEs carry? If such rules exist, they might be reflected in the types of accessory genes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Takeuchi, Nobuto, Hamada-Zhu, Sophia, Suzuki, Haruo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10281811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37339743
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2023.1088
_version_ 1785061063325122560
author Takeuchi, Nobuto
Hamada-Zhu, Sophia
Suzuki, Haruo
author_facet Takeuchi, Nobuto
Hamada-Zhu, Sophia
Suzuki, Haruo
author_sort Takeuchi, Nobuto
collection PubMed
description Mobile genetic elements (MGEs), such as phages and plasmids, often possess accessory genes encoding bacterial functions, facilitating bacterial evolution. Are there rules governing the arsenal of accessory genes MGEs carry? If such rules exist, they might be reflected in the types of accessory genes different MGEs carry. To test this hypothesis, we compare prophages and plasmids with respect to the frequencies at which they carry antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) and virulence factor genes (VFGs) in the genomes of 21 pathogenic bacterial species using public databases. Our results indicate that prophages tend to carry VFGs more frequently than ARGs in three species, whereas plasmids tend to carry ARGs more frequently than VFGs in nine species, relative to genomic backgrounds. In Escherichia coli, where this prophage–plasmid disparity is detected, prophage-borne VFGs encode a much narrower range of functions than do plasmid-borne VFGs, typically involved in damaging host cells or modulating host immunity. In the species where the above disparity is not detected, ARGs and VFGs are barely found in prophages and plasmids. These results indicate that MGEs can differentiate in the types of accessory genes they carry depending on their infection strategies, suggesting a rule governing horizontal gene transfer mediated by MGEs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10281811
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102818112023-06-21 Prophages and plasmids can display opposite trends in the types of accessory genes they carry Takeuchi, Nobuto Hamada-Zhu, Sophia Suzuki, Haruo Proc Biol Sci Genetics and Genomics Mobile genetic elements (MGEs), such as phages and plasmids, often possess accessory genes encoding bacterial functions, facilitating bacterial evolution. Are there rules governing the arsenal of accessory genes MGEs carry? If such rules exist, they might be reflected in the types of accessory genes different MGEs carry. To test this hypothesis, we compare prophages and plasmids with respect to the frequencies at which they carry antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) and virulence factor genes (VFGs) in the genomes of 21 pathogenic bacterial species using public databases. Our results indicate that prophages tend to carry VFGs more frequently than ARGs in three species, whereas plasmids tend to carry ARGs more frequently than VFGs in nine species, relative to genomic backgrounds. In Escherichia coli, where this prophage–plasmid disparity is detected, prophage-borne VFGs encode a much narrower range of functions than do plasmid-borne VFGs, typically involved in damaging host cells or modulating host immunity. In the species where the above disparity is not detected, ARGs and VFGs are barely found in prophages and plasmids. These results indicate that MGEs can differentiate in the types of accessory genes they carry depending on their infection strategies, suggesting a rule governing horizontal gene transfer mediated by MGEs. The Royal Society 2023-06-28 2023-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10281811/ /pubmed/37339743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2023.1088 Text en © 2023 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Genetics and Genomics
Takeuchi, Nobuto
Hamada-Zhu, Sophia
Suzuki, Haruo
Prophages and plasmids can display opposite trends in the types of accessory genes they carry
title Prophages and plasmids can display opposite trends in the types of accessory genes they carry
title_full Prophages and plasmids can display opposite trends in the types of accessory genes they carry
title_fullStr Prophages and plasmids can display opposite trends in the types of accessory genes they carry
title_full_unstemmed Prophages and plasmids can display opposite trends in the types of accessory genes they carry
title_short Prophages and plasmids can display opposite trends in the types of accessory genes they carry
title_sort prophages and plasmids can display opposite trends in the types of accessory genes they carry
topic Genetics and Genomics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10281811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37339743
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2023.1088
work_keys_str_mv AT takeuchinobuto prophagesandplasmidscandisplayoppositetrendsinthetypesofaccessorygenestheycarry
AT hamadazhusophia prophagesandplasmidscandisplayoppositetrendsinthetypesofaccessorygenestheycarry
AT suzukiharuo prophagesandplasmidscandisplayoppositetrendsinthetypesofaccessorygenestheycarry