Cargando…

Performance of alert transmissions from cardiac implantable electronic devices to the CareLink network: A retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND: Remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electric devices improves patient outcomes and experiences. Alert-based systems notify physicians of clinical or device issues in near real-time, but their effectiveness is contingent upon device connectivity. OBJECTIVE: To assess patient connecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cronin, Edmond M., Green, Joseph C., Lande, Jeff, Holmes, Thomas R., Lexcen, Daniel, Taigen, Tyler
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10282010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37351335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cvdhj.2023.03.003
_version_ 1785061103636578304
author Cronin, Edmond M.
Green, Joseph C.
Lande, Jeff
Holmes, Thomas R.
Lexcen, Daniel
Taigen, Tyler
author_facet Cronin, Edmond M.
Green, Joseph C.
Lande, Jeff
Holmes, Thomas R.
Lexcen, Daniel
Taigen, Tyler
author_sort Cronin, Edmond M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electric devices improves patient outcomes and experiences. Alert-based systems notify physicians of clinical or device issues in near real-time, but their effectiveness is contingent upon device connectivity. OBJECTIVE: To assess patient connectivity by analyzing alert transmission times from patient transceivers to the CareLink network. METHODS: Alert transmissions were retrospectively gathered from a query of the United States de-identified Medtronic CareLink database. Alert transmission time was defined as the duration from alert occurrence to arrival at the CareLink network and was analyzed by device type, alert event, and alert type. Using data from previous studies, we computed the benefit of daily connectivity checks. RESULTS: The mean alert transmission time was 14.8 hours (median = 6 hours), with 90.9% of alert transmissions received within 24 hours. Implantable pulse generators (17.0 ± 40.2 hours) and cardiac resynchronization therapy-pacemakers (17.2 ± 42.5 hours) had longer alert transmission times than implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (13.7 ± 29.5 hours) and cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillators (13.5 ± 30.2 hours), but the median time was 6 hours for all 4 device types. There were differences in alert times between specific alert events. Based on our data and previous studies, daily connectivity checks could improve daily alert transmission success by 8.5% but would require up to nearly 800 additional hours of staff time on any given day. CONCLUSION: Alert transmission performance from Medtronic devices was satisfactory, with some delays likely underscored by patient connectivity issues. Daily connectivity checks could provide some improvement in transmission success at the expense of increased clinic burden.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10282010
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102820102023-06-22 Performance of alert transmissions from cardiac implantable electronic devices to the CareLink network: A retrospective analysis Cronin, Edmond M. Green, Joseph C. Lande, Jeff Holmes, Thomas R. Lexcen, Daniel Taigen, Tyler Cardiovasc Digit Health J Original Article BACKGROUND: Remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electric devices improves patient outcomes and experiences. Alert-based systems notify physicians of clinical or device issues in near real-time, but their effectiveness is contingent upon device connectivity. OBJECTIVE: To assess patient connectivity by analyzing alert transmission times from patient transceivers to the CareLink network. METHODS: Alert transmissions were retrospectively gathered from a query of the United States de-identified Medtronic CareLink database. Alert transmission time was defined as the duration from alert occurrence to arrival at the CareLink network and was analyzed by device type, alert event, and alert type. Using data from previous studies, we computed the benefit of daily connectivity checks. RESULTS: The mean alert transmission time was 14.8 hours (median = 6 hours), with 90.9% of alert transmissions received within 24 hours. Implantable pulse generators (17.0 ± 40.2 hours) and cardiac resynchronization therapy-pacemakers (17.2 ± 42.5 hours) had longer alert transmission times than implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (13.7 ± 29.5 hours) and cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillators (13.5 ± 30.2 hours), but the median time was 6 hours for all 4 device types. There were differences in alert times between specific alert events. Based on our data and previous studies, daily connectivity checks could improve daily alert transmission success by 8.5% but would require up to nearly 800 additional hours of staff time on any given day. CONCLUSION: Alert transmission performance from Medtronic devices was satisfactory, with some delays likely underscored by patient connectivity issues. Daily connectivity checks could provide some improvement in transmission success at the expense of increased clinic burden. Elsevier 2023-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10282010/ /pubmed/37351335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cvdhj.2023.03.003 Text en © 2023 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Heart Rhythm Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Cronin, Edmond M.
Green, Joseph C.
Lande, Jeff
Holmes, Thomas R.
Lexcen, Daniel
Taigen, Tyler
Performance of alert transmissions from cardiac implantable electronic devices to the CareLink network: A retrospective analysis
title Performance of alert transmissions from cardiac implantable electronic devices to the CareLink network: A retrospective analysis
title_full Performance of alert transmissions from cardiac implantable electronic devices to the CareLink network: A retrospective analysis
title_fullStr Performance of alert transmissions from cardiac implantable electronic devices to the CareLink network: A retrospective analysis
title_full_unstemmed Performance of alert transmissions from cardiac implantable electronic devices to the CareLink network: A retrospective analysis
title_short Performance of alert transmissions from cardiac implantable electronic devices to the CareLink network: A retrospective analysis
title_sort performance of alert transmissions from cardiac implantable electronic devices to the carelink network: a retrospective analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10282010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37351335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cvdhj.2023.03.003
work_keys_str_mv AT croninedmondm performanceofalerttransmissionsfromcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicestothecarelinknetworkaretrospectiveanalysis
AT greenjosephc performanceofalerttransmissionsfromcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicestothecarelinknetworkaretrospectiveanalysis
AT landejeff performanceofalerttransmissionsfromcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicestothecarelinknetworkaretrospectiveanalysis
AT holmesthomasr performanceofalerttransmissionsfromcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicestothecarelinknetworkaretrospectiveanalysis
AT lexcendaniel performanceofalerttransmissionsfromcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicestothecarelinknetworkaretrospectiveanalysis
AT taigentyler performanceofalerttransmissionsfromcardiacimplantableelectronicdevicestothecarelinknetworkaretrospectiveanalysis