Cargando…
Preverbal infants produce more protophones with artificial objects compared to natural objects
Protophones are considered to be precursors of speech. These vocalizations have been notably discussed in relation to toys and their importance for developing language skills. However, little is known about how natural objects, compared to artificial objects, may affect protophone production, an app...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10282070/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37339994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36734-9 |
_version_ | 1785061117852123136 |
---|---|
author | Gibson, Violet Somogyi, Eszter Nomikou, Iris Taylor, Derry López, Beatriz Mulenga, Innocent Chitalu Davila-Ross, Marina |
author_facet | Gibson, Violet Somogyi, Eszter Nomikou, Iris Taylor, Derry López, Beatriz Mulenga, Innocent Chitalu Davila-Ross, Marina |
author_sort | Gibson, Violet |
collection | PubMed |
description | Protophones are considered to be precursors of speech. These vocalizations have been notably discussed in relation to toys and their importance for developing language skills. However, little is known about how natural objects, compared to artificial objects, may affect protophone production, an approach that could additionally help reconstruct how language evolved. In the current study, we examined protophone production in 58 infants (4–18 months) while interacting with their caregivers when using natural objects, household items, and toys. The infants were recorded in their home environment, in a rural area in Zambia. The results showed that the infants produced significantly fewer protophones when using natural objects than when using household items or toys. Importantly, this pattern was found only for the younger preverbal infants, and there was no indication in the data that the level of caregiver responsiveness differed with regard to the object type. Furthermore, the infants of the present work selected primarily the household items when exposed to both natural objects and household items. These findings suggest that natural objects are less likely to promote protophone production and, consequently, language skill development than artificial objects in preverbal infants, who seem to favor the latter, perhaps due to their features designed for specific functional purposes. Furthermore, these findings provide empirical evidence that the use of complex tools in social interactions may have helped to promote the evolution of language among hominins. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10282070 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102820702023-06-22 Preverbal infants produce more protophones with artificial objects compared to natural objects Gibson, Violet Somogyi, Eszter Nomikou, Iris Taylor, Derry López, Beatriz Mulenga, Innocent Chitalu Davila-Ross, Marina Sci Rep Article Protophones are considered to be precursors of speech. These vocalizations have been notably discussed in relation to toys and their importance for developing language skills. However, little is known about how natural objects, compared to artificial objects, may affect protophone production, an approach that could additionally help reconstruct how language evolved. In the current study, we examined protophone production in 58 infants (4–18 months) while interacting with their caregivers when using natural objects, household items, and toys. The infants were recorded in their home environment, in a rural area in Zambia. The results showed that the infants produced significantly fewer protophones when using natural objects than when using household items or toys. Importantly, this pattern was found only for the younger preverbal infants, and there was no indication in the data that the level of caregiver responsiveness differed with regard to the object type. Furthermore, the infants of the present work selected primarily the household items when exposed to both natural objects and household items. These findings suggest that natural objects are less likely to promote protophone production and, consequently, language skill development than artificial objects in preverbal infants, who seem to favor the latter, perhaps due to their features designed for specific functional purposes. Furthermore, these findings provide empirical evidence that the use of complex tools in social interactions may have helped to promote the evolution of language among hominins. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10282070/ /pubmed/37339994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36734-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Gibson, Violet Somogyi, Eszter Nomikou, Iris Taylor, Derry López, Beatriz Mulenga, Innocent Chitalu Davila-Ross, Marina Preverbal infants produce more protophones with artificial objects compared to natural objects |
title | Preverbal infants produce more protophones with artificial objects compared to natural objects |
title_full | Preverbal infants produce more protophones with artificial objects compared to natural objects |
title_fullStr | Preverbal infants produce more protophones with artificial objects compared to natural objects |
title_full_unstemmed | Preverbal infants produce more protophones with artificial objects compared to natural objects |
title_short | Preverbal infants produce more protophones with artificial objects compared to natural objects |
title_sort | preverbal infants produce more protophones with artificial objects compared to natural objects |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10282070/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37339994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36734-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gibsonviolet preverbalinfantsproducemoreprotophoneswithartificialobjectscomparedtonaturalobjects AT somogyieszter preverbalinfantsproducemoreprotophoneswithartificialobjectscomparedtonaturalobjects AT nomikouiris preverbalinfantsproducemoreprotophoneswithartificialobjectscomparedtonaturalobjects AT taylorderry preverbalinfantsproducemoreprotophoneswithartificialobjectscomparedtonaturalobjects AT lopezbeatriz preverbalinfantsproducemoreprotophoneswithartificialobjectscomparedtonaturalobjects AT mulengainnocentchitalu preverbalinfantsproducemoreprotophoneswithartificialobjectscomparedtonaturalobjects AT davilarossmarina preverbalinfantsproducemoreprotophoneswithartificialobjectscomparedtonaturalobjects |