Cargando…

A comparative surface evaluation of orthodontic mini-implants before and after en masse retraction—A SEM study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the changes in surface morphology of two different types of mini-implants after clinical en masse retraction using scanning electron microscopy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty mini-implants of Dentos (Korea, Absoanchor, BH-1817-08) and Orlus (Korea, Yesanchor, C-1817) were insert...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ranjan, Alok, Shetty, Pravin, Despande, Rahul, Biradar, Anil, Khan, Waseem, Kulshrestha, Rohit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10282524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37351404
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_166_21
_version_ 1785061151976980480
author Ranjan, Alok
Shetty, Pravin
Despande, Rahul
Biradar, Anil
Khan, Waseem
Kulshrestha, Rohit
author_facet Ranjan, Alok
Shetty, Pravin
Despande, Rahul
Biradar, Anil
Khan, Waseem
Kulshrestha, Rohit
author_sort Ranjan, Alok
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the changes in surface morphology of two different types of mini-implants after clinical en masse retraction using scanning electron microscopy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty mini-implants of Dentos (Korea, Absoanchor, BH-1817-08) and Orlus (Korea, Yesanchor, C-1817) were inserted in patients in a split-mouth design who required en masse anterior retraction and absolute anchorage. Surface characteristics of mini-implants such as pitch (distance between consecutive threads), flank width (distance between root and crest), and taper were studied using scanning electron microscope (FEI nanosem450) before and after clinical use. RESULTS: Statistically significant difference (p value = 0.003) was found in a mean reduction of pitch dimension among the two groups with a mean difference of 25.000 μm. Also, a statistically significant difference was noted (p value = 0.001) in a mean reduction of flank width among Dentos implants as compared to Orlus implants. A statistically significant difference (p = 0.001) was seen in the mean reduction of taper dimension among Dentos group (0.0140 ± 0.02271) as compared to the Orlus group (0.0810 ± 0.05152). CONCLUSION: A marked reduction in surface morphology such as the pitch, flank width, and taper of both mini-implants after retrieval was observed. Dentos group of mini-implants displayed better dimensional stability post-retrieval as compared to the Orlus group of mini-implants. All the mini-screws showed milling defects in form of scratches on observation under scanning electron microscopy despite a smooth appearance to the naked eye.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10282524
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102825242023-06-22 A comparative surface evaluation of orthodontic mini-implants before and after en masse retraction—A SEM study Ranjan, Alok Shetty, Pravin Despande, Rahul Biradar, Anil Khan, Waseem Kulshrestha, Rohit J Orthod Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the changes in surface morphology of two different types of mini-implants after clinical en masse retraction using scanning electron microscopy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty mini-implants of Dentos (Korea, Absoanchor, BH-1817-08) and Orlus (Korea, Yesanchor, C-1817) were inserted in patients in a split-mouth design who required en masse anterior retraction and absolute anchorage. Surface characteristics of mini-implants such as pitch (distance between consecutive threads), flank width (distance between root and crest), and taper were studied using scanning electron microscope (FEI nanosem450) before and after clinical use. RESULTS: Statistically significant difference (p value = 0.003) was found in a mean reduction of pitch dimension among the two groups with a mean difference of 25.000 μm. Also, a statistically significant difference was noted (p value = 0.001) in a mean reduction of flank width among Dentos implants as compared to Orlus implants. A statistically significant difference (p = 0.001) was seen in the mean reduction of taper dimension among Dentos group (0.0140 ± 0.02271) as compared to the Orlus group (0.0810 ± 0.05152). CONCLUSION: A marked reduction in surface morphology such as the pitch, flank width, and taper of both mini-implants after retrieval was observed. Dentos group of mini-implants displayed better dimensional stability post-retrieval as compared to the Orlus group of mini-implants. All the mini-screws showed milling defects in form of scratches on observation under scanning electron microscopy despite a smooth appearance to the naked eye. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10282524/ /pubmed/37351404 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_166_21 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Orthodontic Science https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ranjan, Alok
Shetty, Pravin
Despande, Rahul
Biradar, Anil
Khan, Waseem
Kulshrestha, Rohit
A comparative surface evaluation of orthodontic mini-implants before and after en masse retraction—A SEM study
title A comparative surface evaluation of orthodontic mini-implants before and after en masse retraction—A SEM study
title_full A comparative surface evaluation of orthodontic mini-implants before and after en masse retraction—A SEM study
title_fullStr A comparative surface evaluation of orthodontic mini-implants before and after en masse retraction—A SEM study
title_full_unstemmed A comparative surface evaluation of orthodontic mini-implants before and after en masse retraction—A SEM study
title_short A comparative surface evaluation of orthodontic mini-implants before and after en masse retraction—A SEM study
title_sort comparative surface evaluation of orthodontic mini-implants before and after en masse retraction—a sem study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10282524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37351404
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_166_21
work_keys_str_mv AT ranjanalok acomparativesurfaceevaluationoforthodonticminiimplantsbeforeandafterenmasseretractionasemstudy
AT shettypravin acomparativesurfaceevaluationoforthodonticminiimplantsbeforeandafterenmasseretractionasemstudy
AT despanderahul acomparativesurfaceevaluationoforthodonticminiimplantsbeforeandafterenmasseretractionasemstudy
AT biradaranil acomparativesurfaceevaluationoforthodonticminiimplantsbeforeandafterenmasseretractionasemstudy
AT khanwaseem acomparativesurfaceevaluationoforthodonticminiimplantsbeforeandafterenmasseretractionasemstudy
AT kulshrestharohit acomparativesurfaceevaluationoforthodonticminiimplantsbeforeandafterenmasseretractionasemstudy
AT ranjanalok comparativesurfaceevaluationoforthodonticminiimplantsbeforeandafterenmasseretractionasemstudy
AT shettypravin comparativesurfaceevaluationoforthodonticminiimplantsbeforeandafterenmasseretractionasemstudy
AT despanderahul comparativesurfaceevaluationoforthodonticminiimplantsbeforeandafterenmasseretractionasemstudy
AT biradaranil comparativesurfaceevaluationoforthodonticminiimplantsbeforeandafterenmasseretractionasemstudy
AT khanwaseem comparativesurfaceevaluationoforthodonticminiimplantsbeforeandafterenmasseretractionasemstudy
AT kulshrestharohit comparativesurfaceevaluationoforthodonticminiimplantsbeforeandafterenmasseretractionasemstudy