Cargando…
A comparative surface evaluation of orthodontic mini-implants before and after en masse retraction—A SEM study
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the changes in surface morphology of two different types of mini-implants after clinical en masse retraction using scanning electron microscopy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty mini-implants of Dentos (Korea, Absoanchor, BH-1817-08) and Orlus (Korea, Yesanchor, C-1817) were insert...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10282524/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37351404 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_166_21 |
_version_ | 1785061151976980480 |
---|---|
author | Ranjan, Alok Shetty, Pravin Despande, Rahul Biradar, Anil Khan, Waseem Kulshrestha, Rohit |
author_facet | Ranjan, Alok Shetty, Pravin Despande, Rahul Biradar, Anil Khan, Waseem Kulshrestha, Rohit |
author_sort | Ranjan, Alok |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the changes in surface morphology of two different types of mini-implants after clinical en masse retraction using scanning electron microscopy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty mini-implants of Dentos (Korea, Absoanchor, BH-1817-08) and Orlus (Korea, Yesanchor, C-1817) were inserted in patients in a split-mouth design who required en masse anterior retraction and absolute anchorage. Surface characteristics of mini-implants such as pitch (distance between consecutive threads), flank width (distance between root and crest), and taper were studied using scanning electron microscope (FEI nanosem450) before and after clinical use. RESULTS: Statistically significant difference (p value = 0.003) was found in a mean reduction of pitch dimension among the two groups with a mean difference of 25.000 μm. Also, a statistically significant difference was noted (p value = 0.001) in a mean reduction of flank width among Dentos implants as compared to Orlus implants. A statistically significant difference (p = 0.001) was seen in the mean reduction of taper dimension among Dentos group (0.0140 ± 0.02271) as compared to the Orlus group (0.0810 ± 0.05152). CONCLUSION: A marked reduction in surface morphology such as the pitch, flank width, and taper of both mini-implants after retrieval was observed. Dentos group of mini-implants displayed better dimensional stability post-retrieval as compared to the Orlus group of mini-implants. All the mini-screws showed milling defects in form of scratches on observation under scanning electron microscopy despite a smooth appearance to the naked eye. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10282524 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102825242023-06-22 A comparative surface evaluation of orthodontic mini-implants before and after en masse retraction—A SEM study Ranjan, Alok Shetty, Pravin Despande, Rahul Biradar, Anil Khan, Waseem Kulshrestha, Rohit J Orthod Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the changes in surface morphology of two different types of mini-implants after clinical en masse retraction using scanning electron microscopy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty mini-implants of Dentos (Korea, Absoanchor, BH-1817-08) and Orlus (Korea, Yesanchor, C-1817) were inserted in patients in a split-mouth design who required en masse anterior retraction and absolute anchorage. Surface characteristics of mini-implants such as pitch (distance between consecutive threads), flank width (distance between root and crest), and taper were studied using scanning electron microscope (FEI nanosem450) before and after clinical use. RESULTS: Statistically significant difference (p value = 0.003) was found in a mean reduction of pitch dimension among the two groups with a mean difference of 25.000 μm. Also, a statistically significant difference was noted (p value = 0.001) in a mean reduction of flank width among Dentos implants as compared to Orlus implants. A statistically significant difference (p = 0.001) was seen in the mean reduction of taper dimension among Dentos group (0.0140 ± 0.02271) as compared to the Orlus group (0.0810 ± 0.05152). CONCLUSION: A marked reduction in surface morphology such as the pitch, flank width, and taper of both mini-implants after retrieval was observed. Dentos group of mini-implants displayed better dimensional stability post-retrieval as compared to the Orlus group of mini-implants. All the mini-screws showed milling defects in form of scratches on observation under scanning electron microscopy despite a smooth appearance to the naked eye. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10282524/ /pubmed/37351404 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_166_21 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Orthodontic Science https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ranjan, Alok Shetty, Pravin Despande, Rahul Biradar, Anil Khan, Waseem Kulshrestha, Rohit A comparative surface evaluation of orthodontic mini-implants before and after en masse retraction—A SEM study |
title | A comparative surface evaluation of orthodontic mini-implants before and after en masse retraction—A SEM study |
title_full | A comparative surface evaluation of orthodontic mini-implants before and after en masse retraction—A SEM study |
title_fullStr | A comparative surface evaluation of orthodontic mini-implants before and after en masse retraction—A SEM study |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative surface evaluation of orthodontic mini-implants before and after en masse retraction—A SEM study |
title_short | A comparative surface evaluation of orthodontic mini-implants before and after en masse retraction—A SEM study |
title_sort | comparative surface evaluation of orthodontic mini-implants before and after en masse retraction—a sem study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10282524/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37351404 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_166_21 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ranjanalok acomparativesurfaceevaluationoforthodonticminiimplantsbeforeandafterenmasseretractionasemstudy AT shettypravin acomparativesurfaceevaluationoforthodonticminiimplantsbeforeandafterenmasseretractionasemstudy AT despanderahul acomparativesurfaceevaluationoforthodonticminiimplantsbeforeandafterenmasseretractionasemstudy AT biradaranil acomparativesurfaceevaluationoforthodonticminiimplantsbeforeandafterenmasseretractionasemstudy AT khanwaseem acomparativesurfaceevaluationoforthodonticminiimplantsbeforeandafterenmasseretractionasemstudy AT kulshrestharohit acomparativesurfaceevaluationoforthodonticminiimplantsbeforeandafterenmasseretractionasemstudy AT ranjanalok comparativesurfaceevaluationoforthodonticminiimplantsbeforeandafterenmasseretractionasemstudy AT shettypravin comparativesurfaceevaluationoforthodonticminiimplantsbeforeandafterenmasseretractionasemstudy AT despanderahul comparativesurfaceevaluationoforthodonticminiimplantsbeforeandafterenmasseretractionasemstudy AT biradaranil comparativesurfaceevaluationoforthodonticminiimplantsbeforeandafterenmasseretractionasemstudy AT khanwaseem comparativesurfaceevaluationoforthodonticminiimplantsbeforeandafterenmasseretractionasemstudy AT kulshrestharohit comparativesurfaceevaluationoforthodonticminiimplantsbeforeandafterenmasseretractionasemstudy |