Cargando…

Comparative cephalometric evaluation of tongue position in subjects with skeletal class II division 1 and division 2 malocclusion

AIM AND OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the position of the tongue from rest to centric occlusion in subjects with skeletal class II division 1 and skeletal class II division 2 malocclusions with subjects of skeletal class II normal occlusion. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was conducted on 30 i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shinde, Siddharth, Sethi, Shubhita, Vasa, Dhvaani, Bhosale, Veera, Patil, Krishna, Jadhav, Madhura
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10282547/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37351383
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_94_22
_version_ 1785061157550161920
author Shinde, Siddharth
Sethi, Shubhita
Vasa, Dhvaani
Bhosale, Veera
Patil, Krishna
Jadhav, Madhura
author_facet Shinde, Siddharth
Sethi, Shubhita
Vasa, Dhvaani
Bhosale, Veera
Patil, Krishna
Jadhav, Madhura
author_sort Shinde, Siddharth
collection PubMed
description AIM AND OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the position of the tongue from rest to centric occlusion in subjects with skeletal class II division 1 and skeletal class II division 2 malocclusions with subjects of skeletal class II normal occlusion. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was conducted on 30 individuals equally divided into three groups of skeletal class II division (div) 1, skeletal class II div 2, and skeletal class I normal occlusion. The study was conducted on two lateral cephalograms for each subject: one taken at rest and one in centric occlusion. RESULTS: On evaluation of tongue posture, a statistically significant difference was observed at the middle portion of the tongue in class II div 1 malocclusion, and at the posteromedial portion of the dorsum of the tongue in class II div 2 skeletal malocclusions as the tongue moved from rest to centric occlusion. While statistically significant differences were found between class II div 2 malocclusion and class I normal occlusion, no statistically significant differences were observed between class II div 1 and class II div 2 malocclusions. CONCLUSION: Tongue position was observed to be the same in both class II div 1 and class II div 2 malocclusions, with no statistically significant differences. However, a great change was seen in the tongue position from rest to centric occlusion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10282547
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102825472023-06-22 Comparative cephalometric evaluation of tongue position in subjects with skeletal class II division 1 and division 2 malocclusion Shinde, Siddharth Sethi, Shubhita Vasa, Dhvaani Bhosale, Veera Patil, Krishna Jadhav, Madhura J Orthod Sci Original Article AIM AND OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the position of the tongue from rest to centric occlusion in subjects with skeletal class II division 1 and skeletal class II division 2 malocclusions with subjects of skeletal class II normal occlusion. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was conducted on 30 individuals equally divided into three groups of skeletal class II division (div) 1, skeletal class II div 2, and skeletal class I normal occlusion. The study was conducted on two lateral cephalograms for each subject: one taken at rest and one in centric occlusion. RESULTS: On evaluation of tongue posture, a statistically significant difference was observed at the middle portion of the tongue in class II div 1 malocclusion, and at the posteromedial portion of the dorsum of the tongue in class II div 2 skeletal malocclusions as the tongue moved from rest to centric occlusion. While statistically significant differences were found between class II div 2 malocclusion and class I normal occlusion, no statistically significant differences were observed between class II div 1 and class II div 2 malocclusions. CONCLUSION: Tongue position was observed to be the same in both class II div 1 and class II div 2 malocclusions, with no statistically significant differences. However, a great change was seen in the tongue position from rest to centric occlusion. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10282547/ /pubmed/37351383 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_94_22 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Orthodontic Science https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Shinde, Siddharth
Sethi, Shubhita
Vasa, Dhvaani
Bhosale, Veera
Patil, Krishna
Jadhav, Madhura
Comparative cephalometric evaluation of tongue position in subjects with skeletal class II division 1 and division 2 malocclusion
title Comparative cephalometric evaluation of tongue position in subjects with skeletal class II division 1 and division 2 malocclusion
title_full Comparative cephalometric evaluation of tongue position in subjects with skeletal class II division 1 and division 2 malocclusion
title_fullStr Comparative cephalometric evaluation of tongue position in subjects with skeletal class II division 1 and division 2 malocclusion
title_full_unstemmed Comparative cephalometric evaluation of tongue position in subjects with skeletal class II division 1 and division 2 malocclusion
title_short Comparative cephalometric evaluation of tongue position in subjects with skeletal class II division 1 and division 2 malocclusion
title_sort comparative cephalometric evaluation of tongue position in subjects with skeletal class ii division 1 and division 2 malocclusion
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10282547/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37351383
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_94_22
work_keys_str_mv AT shindesiddharth comparativecephalometricevaluationoftonguepositioninsubjectswithskeletalclassiidivision1anddivision2malocclusion
AT sethishubhita comparativecephalometricevaluationoftonguepositioninsubjectswithskeletalclassiidivision1anddivision2malocclusion
AT vasadhvaani comparativecephalometricevaluationoftonguepositioninsubjectswithskeletalclassiidivision1anddivision2malocclusion
AT bhosaleveera comparativecephalometricevaluationoftonguepositioninsubjectswithskeletalclassiidivision1anddivision2malocclusion
AT patilkrishna comparativecephalometricevaluationoftonguepositioninsubjectswithskeletalclassiidivision1anddivision2malocclusion
AT jadhavmadhura comparativecephalometricevaluationoftonguepositioninsubjectswithskeletalclassiidivision1anddivision2malocclusion