Cargando…
Comparative cephalometric evaluation of tongue position in subjects with skeletal class II division 1 and division 2 malocclusion
AIM AND OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the position of the tongue from rest to centric occlusion in subjects with skeletal class II division 1 and skeletal class II division 2 malocclusions with subjects of skeletal class II normal occlusion. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was conducted on 30 i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10282547/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37351383 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_94_22 |
_version_ | 1785061157550161920 |
---|---|
author | Shinde, Siddharth Sethi, Shubhita Vasa, Dhvaani Bhosale, Veera Patil, Krishna Jadhav, Madhura |
author_facet | Shinde, Siddharth Sethi, Shubhita Vasa, Dhvaani Bhosale, Veera Patil, Krishna Jadhav, Madhura |
author_sort | Shinde, Siddharth |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM AND OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the position of the tongue from rest to centric occlusion in subjects with skeletal class II division 1 and skeletal class II division 2 malocclusions with subjects of skeletal class II normal occlusion. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was conducted on 30 individuals equally divided into three groups of skeletal class II division (div) 1, skeletal class II div 2, and skeletal class I normal occlusion. The study was conducted on two lateral cephalograms for each subject: one taken at rest and one in centric occlusion. RESULTS: On evaluation of tongue posture, a statistically significant difference was observed at the middle portion of the tongue in class II div 1 malocclusion, and at the posteromedial portion of the dorsum of the tongue in class II div 2 skeletal malocclusions as the tongue moved from rest to centric occlusion. While statistically significant differences were found between class II div 2 malocclusion and class I normal occlusion, no statistically significant differences were observed between class II div 1 and class II div 2 malocclusions. CONCLUSION: Tongue position was observed to be the same in both class II div 1 and class II div 2 malocclusions, with no statistically significant differences. However, a great change was seen in the tongue position from rest to centric occlusion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10282547 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102825472023-06-22 Comparative cephalometric evaluation of tongue position in subjects with skeletal class II division 1 and division 2 malocclusion Shinde, Siddharth Sethi, Shubhita Vasa, Dhvaani Bhosale, Veera Patil, Krishna Jadhav, Madhura J Orthod Sci Original Article AIM AND OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the position of the tongue from rest to centric occlusion in subjects with skeletal class II division 1 and skeletal class II division 2 malocclusions with subjects of skeletal class II normal occlusion. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was conducted on 30 individuals equally divided into three groups of skeletal class II division (div) 1, skeletal class II div 2, and skeletal class I normal occlusion. The study was conducted on two lateral cephalograms for each subject: one taken at rest and one in centric occlusion. RESULTS: On evaluation of tongue posture, a statistically significant difference was observed at the middle portion of the tongue in class II div 1 malocclusion, and at the posteromedial portion of the dorsum of the tongue in class II div 2 skeletal malocclusions as the tongue moved from rest to centric occlusion. While statistically significant differences were found between class II div 2 malocclusion and class I normal occlusion, no statistically significant differences were observed between class II div 1 and class II div 2 malocclusions. CONCLUSION: Tongue position was observed to be the same in both class II div 1 and class II div 2 malocclusions, with no statistically significant differences. However, a great change was seen in the tongue position from rest to centric occlusion. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10282547/ /pubmed/37351383 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_94_22 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Orthodontic Science https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Shinde, Siddharth Sethi, Shubhita Vasa, Dhvaani Bhosale, Veera Patil, Krishna Jadhav, Madhura Comparative cephalometric evaluation of tongue position in subjects with skeletal class II division 1 and division 2 malocclusion |
title | Comparative cephalometric evaluation of tongue position in subjects with skeletal class II division 1 and division 2 malocclusion |
title_full | Comparative cephalometric evaluation of tongue position in subjects with skeletal class II division 1 and division 2 malocclusion |
title_fullStr | Comparative cephalometric evaluation of tongue position in subjects with skeletal class II division 1 and division 2 malocclusion |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative cephalometric evaluation of tongue position in subjects with skeletal class II division 1 and division 2 malocclusion |
title_short | Comparative cephalometric evaluation of tongue position in subjects with skeletal class II division 1 and division 2 malocclusion |
title_sort | comparative cephalometric evaluation of tongue position in subjects with skeletal class ii division 1 and division 2 malocclusion |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10282547/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37351383 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_94_22 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shindesiddharth comparativecephalometricevaluationoftonguepositioninsubjectswithskeletalclassiidivision1anddivision2malocclusion AT sethishubhita comparativecephalometricevaluationoftonguepositioninsubjectswithskeletalclassiidivision1anddivision2malocclusion AT vasadhvaani comparativecephalometricevaluationoftonguepositioninsubjectswithskeletalclassiidivision1anddivision2malocclusion AT bhosaleveera comparativecephalometricevaluationoftonguepositioninsubjectswithskeletalclassiidivision1anddivision2malocclusion AT patilkrishna comparativecephalometricevaluationoftonguepositioninsubjectswithskeletalclassiidivision1anddivision2malocclusion AT jadhavmadhura comparativecephalometricevaluationoftonguepositioninsubjectswithskeletalclassiidivision1anddivision2malocclusion |