Cargando…
Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and durability
INTRODUCTION: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a widespread condition affecting from 40% to 60% of women. Reconstructive vaginal surgeries are the most commonly performed procedures to treat POP. Among those, uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS), which is usually performed transvaginally, preserves...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10282652/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37351327 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1180060 |
_version_ | 1785061173539897344 |
---|---|
author | Ronsini, Carlo Pasanisi, Francesca Cianci, Stefano Vastarella, Maria Giovanna Pennacchio, Marika Torella, Marco Ercoli, Alfredo Colacurci, Nicola |
author_facet | Ronsini, Carlo Pasanisi, Francesca Cianci, Stefano Vastarella, Maria Giovanna Pennacchio, Marika Torella, Marco Ercoli, Alfredo Colacurci, Nicola |
author_sort | Ronsini, Carlo |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a widespread condition affecting from 40% to 60% of women. Reconstructive vaginal surgeries are the most commonly performed procedures to treat POP. Among those, uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS), which is usually performed transvaginally, preserves pelvic statics and dynamics and appears to be an effective method. Laparoscopic USLS is a valid alternative to vaginal approach, and the aim of our review is to confirm its safety and feasibility and to compare clinical outcomes among the procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following the recommendations in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, we systematically searched the PubMed and Scopus databases in December 2022. We made no restriction on the publication year nor on the country. Data about POP-Q recurrence rate (RR), intraoperative and postoperative complications (graded according to Clavien–Dindo classification), readmission rate, and reoperation rate were collected and analyzed. We used comparative studies for meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of nine studies fulfilled inclusion criteria: two articles were non-comparative retrospective observational studies, three more articles were comparative studies where laparoscopic USLS was confronted with other surgical techniques (only data of laparoscopic USLS were analyzed), and four were comparative retrospective cohort studies between laparoscopic and vaginal USLS procedures. The comparative studies were enrolled in meta-analysis. Patients were analyzed concerning perioperative risks and the risk of recurrence. The meta-analysis highlighted that there was no clear inferiority of one technique over the other. DISCUSSION: Laparoscopic USLS is a technique with a low complication rate and low recurrence rate. Indeed, laparoscopic procedure allows better identification of anatomical landmarks and access to retroperitoneum. Moreover, efficacy over time and durability of Laparoscopic (LPS) USLS was also observed. However, these data should be weighed in light of the length of follow-up, which was in a very short range. Further, focused and prospective studies will be necessary to confirm this finding. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10282652 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102826522023-06-22 Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and durability Ronsini, Carlo Pasanisi, Francesca Cianci, Stefano Vastarella, Maria Giovanna Pennacchio, Marika Torella, Marco Ercoli, Alfredo Colacurci, Nicola Front Surg Surgery INTRODUCTION: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a widespread condition affecting from 40% to 60% of women. Reconstructive vaginal surgeries are the most commonly performed procedures to treat POP. Among those, uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS), which is usually performed transvaginally, preserves pelvic statics and dynamics and appears to be an effective method. Laparoscopic USLS is a valid alternative to vaginal approach, and the aim of our review is to confirm its safety and feasibility and to compare clinical outcomes among the procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following the recommendations in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, we systematically searched the PubMed and Scopus databases in December 2022. We made no restriction on the publication year nor on the country. Data about POP-Q recurrence rate (RR), intraoperative and postoperative complications (graded according to Clavien–Dindo classification), readmission rate, and reoperation rate were collected and analyzed. We used comparative studies for meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of nine studies fulfilled inclusion criteria: two articles were non-comparative retrospective observational studies, three more articles were comparative studies where laparoscopic USLS was confronted with other surgical techniques (only data of laparoscopic USLS were analyzed), and four were comparative retrospective cohort studies between laparoscopic and vaginal USLS procedures. The comparative studies were enrolled in meta-analysis. Patients were analyzed concerning perioperative risks and the risk of recurrence. The meta-analysis highlighted that there was no clear inferiority of one technique over the other. DISCUSSION: Laparoscopic USLS is a technique with a low complication rate and low recurrence rate. Indeed, laparoscopic procedure allows better identification of anatomical landmarks and access to retroperitoneum. Moreover, efficacy over time and durability of Laparoscopic (LPS) USLS was also observed. However, these data should be weighed in light of the length of follow-up, which was in a very short range. Further, focused and prospective studies will be necessary to confirm this finding. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10282652/ /pubmed/37351327 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1180060 Text en © 2023 Ronsini, Pasanisi, Cianci, Vastarella, Pennacchio, Torella, Ercoli and Colacurci. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Surgery Ronsini, Carlo Pasanisi, Francesca Cianci, Stefano Vastarella, Maria Giovanna Pennacchio, Marika Torella, Marco Ercoli, Alfredo Colacurci, Nicola Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and durability |
title | Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and durability |
title_full | Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and durability |
title_fullStr | Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and durability |
title_full_unstemmed | Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and durability |
title_short | Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and durability |
title_sort | laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and durability |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10282652/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37351327 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1180060 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ronsinicarlo laparoscopicuterosacralligamentsuspensionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofsafetyanddurability AT pasanisifrancesca laparoscopicuterosacralligamentsuspensionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofsafetyanddurability AT ciancistefano laparoscopicuterosacralligamentsuspensionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofsafetyanddurability AT vastarellamariagiovanna laparoscopicuterosacralligamentsuspensionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofsafetyanddurability AT pennacchiomarika laparoscopicuterosacralligamentsuspensionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofsafetyanddurability AT torellamarco laparoscopicuterosacralligamentsuspensionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofsafetyanddurability AT ercolialfredo laparoscopicuterosacralligamentsuspensionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofsafetyanddurability AT colacurcinicola laparoscopicuterosacralligamentsuspensionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofsafetyanddurability |