Cargando…

Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and durability

INTRODUCTION: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a widespread condition affecting from 40% to 60% of women. Reconstructive vaginal surgeries are the most commonly performed procedures to treat POP. Among those, uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS), which is usually performed transvaginally, preserves...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ronsini, Carlo, Pasanisi, Francesca, Cianci, Stefano, Vastarella, Maria Giovanna, Pennacchio, Marika, Torella, Marco, Ercoli, Alfredo, Colacurci, Nicola
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10282652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37351327
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1180060
_version_ 1785061173539897344
author Ronsini, Carlo
Pasanisi, Francesca
Cianci, Stefano
Vastarella, Maria Giovanna
Pennacchio, Marika
Torella, Marco
Ercoli, Alfredo
Colacurci, Nicola
author_facet Ronsini, Carlo
Pasanisi, Francesca
Cianci, Stefano
Vastarella, Maria Giovanna
Pennacchio, Marika
Torella, Marco
Ercoli, Alfredo
Colacurci, Nicola
author_sort Ronsini, Carlo
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a widespread condition affecting from 40% to 60% of women. Reconstructive vaginal surgeries are the most commonly performed procedures to treat POP. Among those, uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS), which is usually performed transvaginally, preserves pelvic statics and dynamics and appears to be an effective method. Laparoscopic USLS is a valid alternative to vaginal approach, and the aim of our review is to confirm its safety and feasibility and to compare clinical outcomes among the procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following the recommendations in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, we systematically searched the PubMed and Scopus databases in December 2022. We made no restriction on the publication year nor on the country. Data about POP-Q recurrence rate (RR), intraoperative and postoperative complications (graded according to Clavien–Dindo classification), readmission rate, and reoperation rate were collected and analyzed. We used comparative studies for meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of nine studies fulfilled inclusion criteria: two articles were non-comparative retrospective observational studies, three more articles were comparative studies where laparoscopic USLS was confronted with other surgical techniques (only data of laparoscopic USLS were analyzed), and four were comparative retrospective cohort studies between laparoscopic and vaginal USLS procedures. The comparative studies were enrolled in meta-analysis. Patients were analyzed concerning perioperative risks and the risk of recurrence. The meta-analysis highlighted that there was no clear inferiority of one technique over the other. DISCUSSION: Laparoscopic USLS is a technique with a low complication rate and low recurrence rate. Indeed, laparoscopic procedure allows better identification of anatomical landmarks and access to retroperitoneum. Moreover, efficacy over time and durability of Laparoscopic (LPS) USLS was also observed. However, these data should be weighed in light of the length of follow-up, which was in a very short range. Further, focused and prospective studies will be necessary to confirm this finding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10282652
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102826522023-06-22 Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and durability Ronsini, Carlo Pasanisi, Francesca Cianci, Stefano Vastarella, Maria Giovanna Pennacchio, Marika Torella, Marco Ercoli, Alfredo Colacurci, Nicola Front Surg Surgery INTRODUCTION: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a widespread condition affecting from 40% to 60% of women. Reconstructive vaginal surgeries are the most commonly performed procedures to treat POP. Among those, uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS), which is usually performed transvaginally, preserves pelvic statics and dynamics and appears to be an effective method. Laparoscopic USLS is a valid alternative to vaginal approach, and the aim of our review is to confirm its safety and feasibility and to compare clinical outcomes among the procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following the recommendations in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, we systematically searched the PubMed and Scopus databases in December 2022. We made no restriction on the publication year nor on the country. Data about POP-Q recurrence rate (RR), intraoperative and postoperative complications (graded according to Clavien–Dindo classification), readmission rate, and reoperation rate were collected and analyzed. We used comparative studies for meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of nine studies fulfilled inclusion criteria: two articles were non-comparative retrospective observational studies, three more articles were comparative studies where laparoscopic USLS was confronted with other surgical techniques (only data of laparoscopic USLS were analyzed), and four were comparative retrospective cohort studies between laparoscopic and vaginal USLS procedures. The comparative studies were enrolled in meta-analysis. Patients were analyzed concerning perioperative risks and the risk of recurrence. The meta-analysis highlighted that there was no clear inferiority of one technique over the other. DISCUSSION: Laparoscopic USLS is a technique with a low complication rate and low recurrence rate. Indeed, laparoscopic procedure allows better identification of anatomical landmarks and access to retroperitoneum. Moreover, efficacy over time and durability of Laparoscopic (LPS) USLS was also observed. However, these data should be weighed in light of the length of follow-up, which was in a very short range. Further, focused and prospective studies will be necessary to confirm this finding. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10282652/ /pubmed/37351327 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1180060 Text en © 2023 Ronsini, Pasanisi, Cianci, Vastarella, Pennacchio, Torella, Ercoli and Colacurci. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Ronsini, Carlo
Pasanisi, Francesca
Cianci, Stefano
Vastarella, Maria Giovanna
Pennacchio, Marika
Torella, Marco
Ercoli, Alfredo
Colacurci, Nicola
Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and durability
title Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and durability
title_full Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and durability
title_fullStr Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and durability
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and durability
title_short Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and durability
title_sort laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and durability
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10282652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37351327
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1180060
work_keys_str_mv AT ronsinicarlo laparoscopicuterosacralligamentsuspensionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofsafetyanddurability
AT pasanisifrancesca laparoscopicuterosacralligamentsuspensionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofsafetyanddurability
AT ciancistefano laparoscopicuterosacralligamentsuspensionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofsafetyanddurability
AT vastarellamariagiovanna laparoscopicuterosacralligamentsuspensionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofsafetyanddurability
AT pennacchiomarika laparoscopicuterosacralligamentsuspensionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofsafetyanddurability
AT torellamarco laparoscopicuterosacralligamentsuspensionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofsafetyanddurability
AT ercolialfredo laparoscopicuterosacralligamentsuspensionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofsafetyanddurability
AT colacurcinicola laparoscopicuterosacralligamentsuspensionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofsafetyanddurability