Cargando…

Effect of a low versus intermediate tidal volume strategy on pulmonary complications in patients at risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome—a randomized clinical trial

INTRODUCTION: There is no consensus on whether invasive ventilation should use low tidal volumes (V(T)) to prevent lung complications in patients at risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The purpose of this study is to determine if a low V(T) strategy is more effective than an intermed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Haro, Candelaria, Neto, Ary Serpa, Gomà, Gemma, González, Maria Elena, Ortega, Alfonso, Forteza, Catalina, Frutos-Vivar, Fernando, García, Raquel, Simonis, Fabienne D., Gordo-Vidal, Federico, Suarez, David, Schultz, Marcus J., Artigas, Antonio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10282840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37351068
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1172434
_version_ 1785061201101717504
author de Haro, Candelaria
Neto, Ary Serpa
Gomà, Gemma
González, Maria Elena
Ortega, Alfonso
Forteza, Catalina
Frutos-Vivar, Fernando
García, Raquel
Simonis, Fabienne D.
Gordo-Vidal, Federico
Suarez, David
Schultz, Marcus J.
Artigas, Antonio
author_facet de Haro, Candelaria
Neto, Ary Serpa
Gomà, Gemma
González, Maria Elena
Ortega, Alfonso
Forteza, Catalina
Frutos-Vivar, Fernando
García, Raquel
Simonis, Fabienne D.
Gordo-Vidal, Federico
Suarez, David
Schultz, Marcus J.
Artigas, Antonio
author_sort de Haro, Candelaria
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: There is no consensus on whether invasive ventilation should use low tidal volumes (V(T)) to prevent lung complications in patients at risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The purpose of this study is to determine if a low V(T) strategy is more effective than an intermediate V(T) strategy in preventing pulmonary complications. METHODS: A randomized clinical trial was conducted in invasively ventilated patients with a lung injury prediction score (LIPS) of >4 performed in the intensive care units of 10 hospitals in Spain and one in the United States of America (USA) from 3 November 2014 to 30 August 2016. Patients were randomized to invasive ventilation using low V(T) (≤ 6 mL/kg predicted body weight, PBW) (N = 50) or intermediate V(T) (> 8 mL/kg PBW) (N = 48). The primary endpoint was the development of ARDS during the first 7 days after the initiation of invasive ventilation. Secondary endpoints included the development of pneumonia and severe atelectases; the length of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay; and ICU, hospital, 28– and 90–day mortality. RESULTS: In total, 98 patients [67.3% male], with a median age of 65.5 years [interquartile range 55–73], were enrolled until the study was prematurely stopped because of slow recruitment and loss of equipoise caused by recent study reports. On day 7, five (11.9%) patients in the low V(T) group and four (9.1%) patients in the intermediate V(T) group had developed ARDS (risk ratio, 1.16 [95% CI, 0.62–2.17]; p = 0.735). The incidence of pneumonia and severe atelectasis was also not different between the two groups. The use of a low V(T) strategy did neither affect the length of ICU and hospital stay nor mortality rates. CONCLUSIONS: In patients at risk for ARDS, a low V(T) strategy did not result in a lower incidence of ARDS than an intermediate V(T) strategy. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02070666.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10282840
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102828402023-06-22 Effect of a low versus intermediate tidal volume strategy on pulmonary complications in patients at risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome—a randomized clinical trial de Haro, Candelaria Neto, Ary Serpa Gomà, Gemma González, Maria Elena Ortega, Alfonso Forteza, Catalina Frutos-Vivar, Fernando García, Raquel Simonis, Fabienne D. Gordo-Vidal, Federico Suarez, David Schultz, Marcus J. Artigas, Antonio Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine INTRODUCTION: There is no consensus on whether invasive ventilation should use low tidal volumes (V(T)) to prevent lung complications in patients at risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The purpose of this study is to determine if a low V(T) strategy is more effective than an intermediate V(T) strategy in preventing pulmonary complications. METHODS: A randomized clinical trial was conducted in invasively ventilated patients with a lung injury prediction score (LIPS) of >4 performed in the intensive care units of 10 hospitals in Spain and one in the United States of America (USA) from 3 November 2014 to 30 August 2016. Patients were randomized to invasive ventilation using low V(T) (≤ 6 mL/kg predicted body weight, PBW) (N = 50) or intermediate V(T) (> 8 mL/kg PBW) (N = 48). The primary endpoint was the development of ARDS during the first 7 days after the initiation of invasive ventilation. Secondary endpoints included the development of pneumonia and severe atelectases; the length of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay; and ICU, hospital, 28– and 90–day mortality. RESULTS: In total, 98 patients [67.3% male], with a median age of 65.5 years [interquartile range 55–73], were enrolled until the study was prematurely stopped because of slow recruitment and loss of equipoise caused by recent study reports. On day 7, five (11.9%) patients in the low V(T) group and four (9.1%) patients in the intermediate V(T) group had developed ARDS (risk ratio, 1.16 [95% CI, 0.62–2.17]; p = 0.735). The incidence of pneumonia and severe atelectasis was also not different between the two groups. The use of a low V(T) strategy did neither affect the length of ICU and hospital stay nor mortality rates. CONCLUSIONS: In patients at risk for ARDS, a low V(T) strategy did not result in a lower incidence of ARDS than an intermediate V(T) strategy. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02070666. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10282840/ /pubmed/37351068 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1172434 Text en Copyright © 2023 de Haro, Neto, Gomà, González, Ortega, Forteza, Frutos-Vivar, García, Simonis, Gordo-Vidal, Suarez, Schultz and Artigas. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
de Haro, Candelaria
Neto, Ary Serpa
Gomà, Gemma
González, Maria Elena
Ortega, Alfonso
Forteza, Catalina
Frutos-Vivar, Fernando
García, Raquel
Simonis, Fabienne D.
Gordo-Vidal, Federico
Suarez, David
Schultz, Marcus J.
Artigas, Antonio
Effect of a low versus intermediate tidal volume strategy on pulmonary complications in patients at risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome—a randomized clinical trial
title Effect of a low versus intermediate tidal volume strategy on pulmonary complications in patients at risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome—a randomized clinical trial
title_full Effect of a low versus intermediate tidal volume strategy on pulmonary complications in patients at risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome—a randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Effect of a low versus intermediate tidal volume strategy on pulmonary complications in patients at risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome—a randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Effect of a low versus intermediate tidal volume strategy on pulmonary complications in patients at risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome—a randomized clinical trial
title_short Effect of a low versus intermediate tidal volume strategy on pulmonary complications in patients at risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome—a randomized clinical trial
title_sort effect of a low versus intermediate tidal volume strategy on pulmonary complications in patients at risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome—a randomized clinical trial
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10282840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37351068
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1172434
work_keys_str_mv AT deharocandelaria effectofalowversusintermediatetidalvolumestrategyonpulmonarycomplicationsinpatientsatriskofacuterespiratorydistresssyndromearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT netoaryserpa effectofalowversusintermediatetidalvolumestrategyonpulmonarycomplicationsinpatientsatriskofacuterespiratorydistresssyndromearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT gomagemma effectofalowversusintermediatetidalvolumestrategyonpulmonarycomplicationsinpatientsatriskofacuterespiratorydistresssyndromearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT gonzalezmariaelena effectofalowversusintermediatetidalvolumestrategyonpulmonarycomplicationsinpatientsatriskofacuterespiratorydistresssyndromearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT ortegaalfonso effectofalowversusintermediatetidalvolumestrategyonpulmonarycomplicationsinpatientsatriskofacuterespiratorydistresssyndromearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT fortezacatalina effectofalowversusintermediatetidalvolumestrategyonpulmonarycomplicationsinpatientsatriskofacuterespiratorydistresssyndromearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT frutosvivarfernando effectofalowversusintermediatetidalvolumestrategyonpulmonarycomplicationsinpatientsatriskofacuterespiratorydistresssyndromearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT garciaraquel effectofalowversusintermediatetidalvolumestrategyonpulmonarycomplicationsinpatientsatriskofacuterespiratorydistresssyndromearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT simonisfabienned effectofalowversusintermediatetidalvolumestrategyonpulmonarycomplicationsinpatientsatriskofacuterespiratorydistresssyndromearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT gordovidalfederico effectofalowversusintermediatetidalvolumestrategyonpulmonarycomplicationsinpatientsatriskofacuterespiratorydistresssyndromearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT suarezdavid effectofalowversusintermediatetidalvolumestrategyonpulmonarycomplicationsinpatientsatriskofacuterespiratorydistresssyndromearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT schultzmarcusj effectofalowversusintermediatetidalvolumestrategyonpulmonarycomplicationsinpatientsatriskofacuterespiratorydistresssyndromearandomizedclinicaltrial
AT artigasantonio effectofalowversusintermediatetidalvolumestrategyonpulmonarycomplicationsinpatientsatriskofacuterespiratorydistresssyndromearandomizedclinicaltrial